The claimant sought recovery of his substantial winnings from the defendant gaming club. The club had resisted saying that the methods used by the claimant at cards, called, ‘edge sorting’ was a form of cheating, a criminal offence within the section, and that therefore no claim arose. Held: The claimant’s appeal failed (Sharp LJ dissenting) … Continue reading Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd (T/A Crockfords Club): CA 4 Nov 2016
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Cheques to buy gambling chips were drawn on a bank which, to the knowledge of the punter but not of the club, did not exist. The gambler said that the cheques amounted to the giving of credit under the Act and that the transactions were void. Held: The instruments were cheques and that the non-existence … Continue reading Aziz v Mayfair Casinos Ltd: 30 Jun 1982
The claimant had sued the defendant for non-payment under a cheque for andpound;2 million. The cheque had been issued to replace earlier cheques given but not met, for sums staked for gambling at the claimant’s casino. The defendant said that the contract breached the prohibition of credit for gambling. Held: The defendant appealed against summary … Continue reading Aspinall’s Club Ltd v Al-Zayat: CA 19 Oct 2007
The claimant sought payment on a cheque in respect of gamblig debts incurred by the defendant. Teare J said: ‘The ordinary and natural meaning of credit in the context of section 16 of the Act is ‘time to pay’, in the sense of deferring or postponing the punter’s obligation to pay for the chips he … Continue reading Aspinall’s Club Ltd v Al-Zayat: ComC 3 Sep 2008
The Defendant had gambled and lost money at the Claimant’s clubs. andpound;29,000 was due on cheques drawn by him which had not been honoured. An agreement was reached under which he would pay andpound;13,500 in cash, and would reduce the rest of the balance by stages out of winnings. Held: That was an illegal agreement … Continue reading Ladup Ltd v Yazbeck: QBD 14 May 1985
The court was asked not to renew a gaming licence on the basis that the company was not a fit and proper person. They had a practice of repeatedly accepting cheques from persons whose previous cheques had been dishonoured, and in circumstances in which the licence holder knew that the new cheques would be dishonoured … Continue reading Regina v Knightsbridge London Crown Court ex parte Marcrest Properties Ltd: CA 1983
Banker’s reference no guarantee An Arab businessman lost pounds 18m at the claimant casino, and wrote scrip cheques against his account with the defendant. The claimant obtained judgment, but being unable to enforce that judgment pursued his bank. The club had used a system where its bankers obtained confirmation of the value of a customer’s … Continue reading Grosvenor Casinos Ltd v National Bank of Abu Dhabi: ComC 17 Mar 2008
The Defendant had gambled at the plaintiff’s casino, using cheques drawn on a company to obtain chips, all of which he lost. The cheques not having been honoured, Crockfords sued the Defendant for repayment of the loan made to him on the issue of the chips, and applied for summary judgment. At first instance, Henry … Continue reading Crockfords Club Ltd v Mehta: CA 8 Jan 1992
The claimant gambler sought payment of his winnings. The casino said that he had operated a system called edge-sorting to achieve the winnings, and that this was a form of cheating so as to excuse their payment. The system exploited tiny variances in the appearance of the sides of playing cards, and the manipulation of … Continue reading Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (T/A Crockfords): SC 25 Oct 2017
The claimant, a professional gambler, sued the defendant casino for his winnings. The club replied that the claimant’s methods amounted to a form of cheating, and that no liability arose to pay the winnings. Held: The claim failed. ‘The fact that the claimant is genuinely convinced that he is not a cheat and even that … Continue reading Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd (T/A Crockfords Club): QBD 8 Oct 2014
When deciding on the grant of licences for gaming machines with prizes in an amusement centre, the Local Authority had the right to look at the social circumstances in the surrounding area, and take the view that the grant of the licence would be inappropriate. Citations: Times 26-Oct-1998 Statutes: Gaming Act 1968 34, Lotteries and … Continue reading Regina v Liverpool Crown Court and Another, Ex Parte Luxury Leisure Ltd: CA 26 Oct 1998
The defendant surgeon was said to have made false claims for payment for operations, and was charged under the 1968 Act. He claimed to have been entitled to the sums claimed, and denied that he had been dishonest. The court considered the meaning of dishonesty. Held: His appeal failed. Dishonesty is a state of the … Continue reading Regina v Ghosh: CACD 5 Apr 1982
(Jamaica) A cheque was drawn which was used as part a complex financial arrangement intended to purchase foreign currency to work around Jamaica’s foreign exchange control regulations. It was asserted that by presenting the cheque used in the . .
Certain investment trust companies (ITCs) sought refunds of VAT paid on the supply of investment management services. EU law however clarified that they were not due. Refunds were restricted by the Commissioners both as to the amounts and limitation . .
