Maurice Kay LJ said that section 2(6)(c) of the 2003 Act ‘should be construed as referring only to other EAWs issued in respect of the offence.’ Judges: Maurice Kay LJ, Penry-Davey J Citations: [2008] EWHC 1389 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 2(6)(c) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Louca v A … Continue reading Zakowski v Regional Court In Szczecin, Poland: Admn 16 May 2008
The appellants challenged the effectiveness of European Arrest Warrants, saying that the requests were deficient in not providing adequate details of warrants issued in support of the decisions. They had been convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment which were at first condition, but were now to be served. The appellants contende dthat the European … Continue reading Goluchowski and SAS v District Court and Circuit Court In Poland: SC 29 Jun 2016
[2014] EWHC 4162 (Admin) Bailii Extradition Act 2003 2(6)(c) England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Goluchowski and SAS v District Court and Circuit Court In Poland SC 29-Jun-2016 The appellants challenged the effectiveness of European Arrest Warrants, saying that the requests were deficient in not providing adequate details of warrants issued in support of … Continue reading Regional Court In Tarnow Poland v Wojciechowski: Admn 4 Nov 2014
The defendant resisted extradition saying that the European Arrest Warrant was defective in not revealing the existence of two earlier such warrants. He said that absence of such information would hinder a court which was concerned as to possible abuse. Held: The appeal failed. The information was optional, and the information missing from the request … Continue reading Louca v A German Judicial Authority: SC 19 Nov 2009