Click the case name for better results:

Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini v Italy: ECHR 10 Nov 2004

ECHR (French Text) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies); Violation of Art. 6-1; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings. Citations: 65075/01, [2004] ECHR 615 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini … Continue reading Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini v Italy: ECHR 10 Nov 2004

Anagnostopoulos v Greece: ECHR 10 Feb 2005

ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of Art. 6-1; Violation of Art. 13; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) – claim rejected; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings. Citations: 37429/02, [2005] ECHR 95 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 6.1 Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human … Continue reading Anagnostopoulos v Greece: ECHR 10 Feb 2005

Sukhorubchenko v Russia: ECHR 10 Feb 2005

ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to access to a court; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings; Not necessary to examine Art. 13; No violation of P1-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award. Citations: 69315/01, [2005] … Continue reading Sukhorubchenko v Russia: ECHR 10 Feb 2005

Stephen Jordan (No 2) v The United Kingdom: ECHR 10 Dec 2002

The applicant was a soldier who had been court marshalled for misuse of travel warrants. He wished to use in his defence his recent epilepsy. There was some delay while medical reports were obtained, and subsequently when the new legal system was brought in and again for the issue of a new legal aid order. … Continue reading Stephen Jordan (No 2) v The United Kingdom: ECHR 10 Dec 2002

Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another: QBD 28 Oct 2009

The claimant a prisoner detained after the expiry of his lfe sentence tariff as dangerous, sought a declaration that the refusal to allow him to register as a voter in prison infringed his human rights. Held: Such a claim had already succeeded in Scotland, and before the ECHR, and the government was considering how it … Continue reading Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another: QBD 28 Oct 2009

Fornah v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 9 Jun 2005

The applicant sought refugee status, saying that if returned home to Sierra Leone, she would as a young woman be liable to be circumcised against her will. Held: Female sexual mutilation ‘is an evil practice internationally condemned and in clear violation of Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights (‘ECHR’). As a practice, … Continue reading Fornah v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 9 Jun 2005

Regina v Muhamad: CACD 19 Jul 2002

The appellant had been convicted of an offence under the section in that as a bankrupt, he ‘in the two years before the petition, materially contributed to, or increased the extent of, his insolvency by gambling or by rash and hazardous speculations’. The actus reus – the bankruptcy petition and the bankruptcy to which it … Continue reading Regina v Muhamad: CACD 19 Jul 2002

Yesiller Ve Sol Gelecek Partisi v Turkey: ECHR 10 May 2022

ECHR Judgment : No Article 11 – Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Citations: 41955/14, [2022] ECHR 360 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.677888

Karausta v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another: Admn 10 Oct 2002

The applicant sought planning permission extending the hours for her hot food take away after midnight. It was refused for the effect on local residents. She complained that the Inspector had failed to consider a shorter extension, and that another local shop did have such hours. Held: The inspector was not obliged to consider suggestions … Continue reading Karausta v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another: Admn 10 Oct 2002

Bigun v Ukraine: ECHR 21 Mar 2019

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 30315/10, [2019] ECHR 234 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.636003

Hoxha and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 10 Mar 2005

The claimants sought to maintain their claims for asylum. They had fled persecution, but before their claims for asylum were determined conditions in their home country changed so that they could no longer be said to have a well founded fear of persecution. Held: The decision on the grant required the fear to remain well … Continue reading Hoxha and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 10 Mar 2005

Surek and Ozdemir v Turkey: ECHR 8 Jul 1999

Grand Chamber – Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 10; Not necessary to examine Art. 18 (second applicant); Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion, estoppel); Violation of Art. 6-1; Pecuniary damage – financial award (first applicant); Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – … Continue reading Surek and Ozdemir v Turkey: ECHR 8 Jul 1999

Makhmudova And Others v Russia: ECHR 12 Mar 2019

ECHR Judgment : Article 2 – Right to life : Third Section Committee ECHR Judgment : Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage – award : Third Section Committee Citations: 22983/10, [2019] ECHR 202, [2020] ECHR 446 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.636021

Gul v Turkey: ECHR 9 Oct 2018

ECHR Judgment : Article 10 – Freedom of expression-{general} : Second Section Committee Citations: 14619/12, [2018] ECHR 809 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.628807

Solyanik v Russia: ECHR 10 May 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Citations: 47987/15, [2022] ECHR 359 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.677881

Sablon v Belgique: ECHR 10 Apr 2001

Citations: 36445/97, [2001] ECHR 264 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Umek v Slovenia ECHR 8-Jan-2009 The claimant said that the defendant country had failed to provide her with an effective remedy for delay in proceedings before its courts. She had sought damages after being involved … Continue reading Sablon v Belgique: ECHR 10 Apr 2001

Garrett, Falcao And Others v Portugal: ECHR 10 Apr 2001

Citations: 29813/96, [2001] ECHR 246 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: See Also – Garrett, Falcao And Others v Portugal ECHR 11-Jan-2000 Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (ratione temporis); Violation of P1-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 6, 13 and 17; Just satisfaction reserved; Costs … Continue reading Garrett, Falcao And Others v Portugal: ECHR 10 Apr 2001

Hutt-Clauss v France: ECHR 10 Apr 2003

Citations: 44482/98, [2003] ECHR 164 Links: Worldlii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.213374

Leempoel and SA ED Cine Revue v Belgium: ECHR 9 Nov 2006

‘In matters relating to striking a balance between protecting private life and the freedom of expression that the Court had had to rule upon, it has always emphasised . . the requirement that the publication of information, documents or photographs in the press should serve the public interest and make a contribution to the debate … Continue reading Leempoel and SA ED Cine Revue v Belgium: ECHR 9 Nov 2006