The Union appealed a finding of unfair dismissal and discrimination. It denied that she had sufficient continuous service, saying that the peirod suggested involved working for two employers. It also said that since the objection went as to jurisdiction, there was no requirement for it to have leave to appeal. Held: Meeting the continuous employment … Continue reading Leicester University Students Union v Mahomed: EAT 6 Dec 1994

The applicant was ‘precluded by Section 64(1)(b) from making his complaint to the industrial tribunal’ The appeal succeeded. Judges: Dillon LJ Citations: [1992] ICR 661 Statutes: Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1988 64(1)(b) Citing: Appeal from – Barber v Thames Television plc EAT 1991 The EAT has a power exceptionally, to receive an argument which had … Continue reading Barber v Thames Television plc: CA 1992

The EAT has a power exceptionally, to receive an argument which had not been put to tribunal. Knox J said: ‘We do not accept the proposition that any and every contention by a party to an appeal that that party by calling further evidence can show that the applicant’s case falls outside the jurisdiction of … Continue reading Barber v Thames Television plc: EAT 1991