The place where an employee was employed for the purposes of the employer’s business was to be determined by a consideration of the factual circumstances which obtained until the dismissal. Where an employee had worked in only one location under his contract of employment for the purposes of the employer’s business then it defied common … Continue reading High Table Limited v Horst, Jowett and and Burley: CA 1 Jul 1997
bas_thomasEAT199303 The court had given one judgment dismissing the employer’s appeal against a finding that the employee had not unreasonably refused a new position and was accordingly redudant. Before the order was drawn up a further point of law was raied and the court sat again to consider it. It now asked: ‘whether the criterion … Continue reading Bass Leisure Ltd v Thomas: EAT 22 Mar 1993
A court should not infer that a person is an employee not an independent contractor only because he or she does not appear to be running a business. The tribunal should have applied the definition from the 1976 Regulations which defined a self employed person as some employed ‘otherwise than under a contract of services … Continue reading Ironmonger v Movefield Ltd t/a Deering Appointments: EAT 1988
