Click the case name for better results:

Commission v Portugal: ECJ 4 Jun 2002

Citations: C-367/98, [2003] QB 233, [2002] EUECJ C-367/98 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: European Cited by: Cited – Commission v United Kingdom ECJ 13-May-2003 Complaint was made by the Commission that the ‘golden share’ retained by the respondent government in British Airports Authority was an unlawful restriction on the free movement of capital under the Treaty. The … Continue reading Commission v Portugal: ECJ 4 Jun 2002

Gibraltar v Council: ECJ 29 Jun 1993

(Judgment) European Community jurisdiction on Gibraltar Airport dispute must await UK-Spain agreement. ECJ Article 2(2) of Directive 89/463 concerning the authorization of scheduled inter-regional air services for the transport of passengers, mail and cargo between Member States, which suspends the application of that directive to Gibraltar airport until the cooperation arrangements for that airport agreed … Continue reading Gibraltar v Council: ECJ 29 Jun 1993

Fratelli Zerbone Snc v Amministrazione Delle Finanze Dello Stato: ECJ 31 Jan 1978

ECJ The direct application of a community regulation means that its entry into force and its application in favour of or against those subject to it are independent of any measure adopting it into national law. By reason of the obligations imposed on them by the treaty member states must not impede the direct effect … Continue reading Fratelli Zerbone Snc v Amministrazione Delle Finanze Dello Stato: ECJ 31 Jan 1978

Commission of the European Communities v French Republic C-483/99: ECJ 4 Jun 2002

Europa Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Articles 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) and 73b of the EC Treaty (now Article 56 EC) – Rights attaching to the ‘golden share held by the French Republic in Societe Nationale Elf-Aquitaine. Citations: [2002] EUECJ C-483/99 Links: Bailii … Continue reading Commission of the European Communities v French Republic C-483/99: ECJ 4 Jun 2002

Ventouris Enterprises v Commission: ECFI 20 Jul 1999

ECJ Competition – Regulation (EEC)No 4056/86 – Investigations carried out at company premises other than those of the company to which the investigation decision is addressed – Article 85(1)of the EC Treaty (now Article 81(1)EC) – Price-fixing – Proof of infringement – Error of assessment of the facts – Fines – Proportionality – Mitigating circumstances. … Continue reading Ventouris Enterprises v Commission: ECFI 20 Jul 1999

HFB and others v Commission: ECFI 20 Mar 2002

1. During the proceedings before the Community Courts internal Commission documents are not to be communicated to the applicants, unless the circumstances of the case are exceptional and the applicants make out a plausible case for the need to do so. That is the case as regards the expert accountant’s report, whose purpose, as a … Continue reading HFB and others v Commission: ECFI 20 Mar 2002

Ca’Pasta v Commission: ECFI 16 Jul 1998

ECJ Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures producing binding legal effects – Letter from the Commission informing the applicant of the continuation of a procedure for cancelling a contribution and recovering the amount already paid (EC Treaty, Art. 173; Council Regulation No 4028/86) Any measure which produces binding legal effects such … Continue reading Ca’Pasta v Commission: ECFI 16 Jul 1998

H and R Ecroyd v Commission: ECFI 20 May 1999

ECFI Preliminary rulings – Assessment of validity – Declaration that a regulation is invalid – Effects – Application by analogy of Article 176 of the Treaty (now Article 233 EC)- Obligations of the Community institutions – Scope – Compensation for damage caused by the illegality found – Covered (EC Treaty, Arts 176, 177 and 215, … Continue reading H and R Ecroyd v Commission: ECFI 20 May 1999

Irish Sugar v Commission T-228/97: ECFI 7 Oct 1999

Article 86 of the EC Treaty (now Article 82 EC) – Dominant position and joint dominant position – Abuse – Fine. Citations: [1999] ECR II-2969, [1999] EUECJ T-228/97 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: European Cited by: Cited – Attheraces Ltd and Another v British Horse Racing Board and Another ChD 21-Dec-2005 The claimants relayed horse racing events … Continue reading Irish Sugar v Commission T-228/97: ECFI 7 Oct 1999

Broome and Wellington v Commission: ECFI 25 May 1998

ECJ Measures whose legal effects are binding and are capable of affecting the applicants’ interests by clearly altering their legal position constitute acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment under Article 173 of the Treaty. In the case of acts adopted by a procedure involving several stages, in principle only measures … Continue reading Broome and Wellington v Commission: ECFI 25 May 1998

Antillean Rice Mills v Council: ECFI 21 Mar 1997

ECJ Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Financial loss – Limited duration of the contested measure (EC Treaty, Art. 185; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2))In the context of the examination of the urgency of … Continue reading Antillean Rice Mills v Council: ECFI 21 Mar 1997

Buchel v Council and Commission: ECFI 26 Sep 2000

1. A declaration of annulment limited solely to the provision of a regulation concerning the extension of an anti-dumping duty would make the regulation extending the definitive anti-dumping duty to importers of similar products or parts of those products a dead letter. The remainder of the operative part of that regulation concerns only the implementation … Continue reading Buchel v Council and Commission: ECFI 26 Sep 2000

Region Wallonne v Commission: ECFI 29 Sep 1997

ECFI A federal regional authority is not entitled to bring an action seeking annulment of a decision adopted under the ECSC Treaty since such authorities are not referred to by Article 33 of the ECSC Treaty, which provides an exhaustive list of the persons entitled to bring an action for annulment, and Article 173 of … Continue reading Region Wallonne v Commission: ECFI 29 Sep 1997

Keeling v Office de l’harmonisation dans le marche interieur: ECFI 8 Jun 1998

ECFI An action brought directly against a decision of the President of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) by a member of a Board of Appeal of the Office on the basis of Article 173 of the Treaty must be dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.According to the first paragraph of … Continue reading Keeling v Office de l’harmonisation dans le marche interieur: ECFI 8 Jun 1998

Weyl Beef Products and others v Commission: ECFI 31 Jan 2001

ECJ 1. Since aid concerns an indeterminate group of persons, the sole purpose of the requirement that aid authorisation under Article 93(3)of the Treaty (now Article 88(3)EC)be notified is to oblige the Commission to ensure that all persons who may be concerned are alerted. Publication of an authorisation notice in the Official Journal is an … Continue reading Weyl Beef Products and others v Commission: ECFI 31 Jan 2001

Monsanto v Commission: ECFI 22 Apr 1999

ECFI 1 Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision rejecting a subsidiary’s application for inclusion of a pharmacologically active substance in the list of substances not subject to maximum residue limits – Action brought by the parent company – Whether admissible (EC … Continue reading Monsanto v Commission: ECFI 22 Apr 1999

Antilles Neerlandaises v Council and Commission: ECFI 16 Nov 1998

ECFI Procedure – Division of jurisdiction between the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance – Action, pending before the Court of First Instance, brought by a natural or legal person under Article 173, fourth paragraph, and Article 178 of the Treaty, concerning the introduction, in the first case by the Commission and … Continue reading Antilles Neerlandaises v Council and Commission: ECFI 16 Nov 1998

Partex v Commission T-182/96: ECFI 16 Sep 1999

ECJ 1 In so far as a Member State confirms the accuracy of the facts and accounts in final payment claims in respect of a grant of financial assistance from the European Social Fund (ESF), it is responsible to the Commission for the certifications which it submits. Furthermore, given that Member States are under an … Continue reading Partex v Commission T-182/96: ECFI 16 Sep 1999

Biscuiterie confiserie LOR and Confiserie du Tech v Commission: ECFI 26 Mar 1999

ECJ Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Regulation concerning the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure provided for in Article 17 of Regulation No 2081/92 – Action brought by producers of `tourons’ – Inadmissible (EC Treaty, Arts 173, … Continue reading Biscuiterie confiserie LOR and Confiserie du Tech v Commission: ECFI 26 Mar 1999

Peugeot v Commission: ECFI 2 May 1997

ECJ 1 Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures producing binding legal effects – Letter forming part of the first stage of the procedure laid down in Article 5 of Commission Decision 94/810 – Preparatory act (EC Treaty, Art. 173; Commission Decision 94/810, Art. 5) 2 Procedure – Action contesting a preparatory … Continue reading Peugeot v Commission: ECFI 2 May 1997

Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft v Council and Commission: ECFI 28 Apr 1998

ECJ 1 Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Lawful or unlawful act – Damage – Causal link – Burden of proof (EC Treaty, Art. 215) 2 Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Regulation imposing a trade embargo against a non-member country – Damage resulting from retaliatory measures taken by the government of that country – Causal link … Continue reading Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft v Council and Commission: ECFI 28 Apr 1998

Danielsson, Largenteau and Haoa v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 22 Dec 1995

ECFI Nuclear tests conducted by a Member State – Application for interim relief -Article 34 of the EAEC Treaty – Application for suspension of the operation of a Commission decision regarding nuclear tests. In principle, the issue of the admissibility of the main action should not be examined in proceedings relating to an application for … Continue reading Danielsson, Largenteau and Haoa v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 22 Dec 1995

AssiDoman Kraft Products and others v Commission: ECFI 10 Jul 1997

ECJ Competition – Consequences of partial annulment by the Court of Justice of a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the Treaty – Effects of the judgment on persons to whom the decision was addressed who did not bring an action for annulment – Article 176 of the Treaty – Request for … Continue reading AssiDoman Kraft Products and others v Commission: ECFI 10 Jul 1997

IECC v Commission T-133/95: ECFI 16 Sep 1998

ECJ 1 A claim in an action for annulment that the Commission should be required to adopt appropriate measures to comply with its obligations under Article 176 of the Treaty is inadmissible. While it is for the institution concerned, under that provision, to adopt the measures required to give effect to a judgment delivered in … Continue reading IECC v Commission T-133/95: ECFI 16 Sep 1998

IECC v Commission T-110/95: ECFI 16 Sep 1998

ECJ 1 A claim in an action for annulment that the Commission should be required to adopt appropriate measures to comply with its obligations under Article 176 of the Treaty is inadmissible. While it is for the institution concerned, under that provision, to adopt the measures required to give effect to a judgment delivered in … Continue reading IECC v Commission T-110/95: ECFI 16 Sep 1998

Corman v Commission: ECFI 30 Jan 1997

ECFI 1 Agriculture – Common organization of the markets – Milk and milk products – Aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for use in the manufacture of pastry products, ice-cream and other foodstuffs – Conditions for granting aid – Intermediate products – Definition – Obligation to add tracers(Commission Regulation No 570/88, Art. 9a)2 Agriculture … Continue reading Corman v Commission: ECFI 30 Jan 1997

Tsimenta Chalkidos v Commission: ECFI 11 Aug 1995

Competition – Payment of a fine – Bank guarantee – Procedure for interim relief – Suspension of operation.It is only in exceptional circumstances that the judge hearing an application for interim measures should order the suspension of the applicant undertaking’ s obligation to provide a bank guarantee securing payment of a fine imposed on it.The … Continue reading Tsimenta Chalkidos v Commission: ECFI 11 Aug 1995

BP Chemicals v Commission T-11/95: ECFI 15 Sep 1998

EJ Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Date on which the measure came to the applicant’s knowledge – Subsidiary criterion – Date of publication (EC Treaty, Arts 93(2) and 173, fifth para.) 2 Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual … Continue reading BP Chemicals v Commission T-11/95: ECFI 15 Sep 1998

Atlantic Container Line and others v Commission: ECFI 28 Feb 2002

ECFI 1. In the case of an agreement between shipping lines on the scheduled transport of containers across the Atlantic between Northern Europe and the United States and on the inland carriage of the containers, the relevant markets directly affected are those in transport services and not that in the export of goods to the … Continue reading Atlantic Container Line and others v Commission: ECFI 28 Feb 2002

British Airways and others and British Midland Airways v Commission: ECFI 25 Jun 1998

ECFI 1 Far from enjoying the same rights to a fair hearing as those which individuals against whom a procedure has been instituted are recognised as having, concerned parties, within the meaning of Article 93(2) of the Treaty, have only the right to be involved in the administrative procedure to the extent appropriate in the … Continue reading British Airways and others and British Midland Airways v Commission: ECFI 25 Jun 1998

SNCF and British Railways v Commission: ECFI 12 May 1995

ECFI Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Suspension of operation of a competition decision – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Concept – Uncertain and speculative risk – Exclusion – Balance of convenience – (EC Treaty, Art. 185; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First … Continue reading SNCF and British Railways v Commission: ECFI 12 May 1995

Schulte v Council and Commission: ECFI 7 Feb 2002

1. The Community’s liability for losses resulting from the application of Regulation No 857/84, which fixes the reference quantity to be allocated under the scheme for additional levies on milk to each producer on the basis of production delivered during a reference year, cannot be incurred with respect to losses sustained after the date of … Continue reading Schulte v Council and Commission: ECFI 7 Feb 2002

Greenpeace and others v Commission: ECFI 9 Aug 1995

ECJ 1. Persons other than the addressees may claim that a decision is of individual concern to them only if that decision affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them, or by reason of factual circumstances which differentiate them from all other persons and thereby distinguish them individually in the same … Continue reading Greenpeace and others v Commission: ECFI 9 Aug 1995

Guna v Council: ECFI 29 Oct 1993

ECFI Articles 7 and 9 of Directive 92/73 widening the scope of Directives 65/65 and 75/319 on pharmaceutical products and laying down additional provisions on homeopathic medicinal products are not of direct and individual concern, within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty, to manufacturers and importers of homeopathic medicinal … Continue reading Guna v Council: ECFI 29 Oct 1993

PTT Nederland and others v Commission: ECFI 21 Jun 1991

ECFI Procedure – Allocation of jurisdiction between the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance – Proceedings instituted by a natural or legal person on the basis of the second paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty concerning the implementation of the competition rules applicable to undertakings and pending before the Court of … Continue reading PTT Nederland and others v Commission: ECFI 21 Jun 1991

Cimenteries CBR SA, Blue Circle Industries plc, Syndicat Nationale des Fabricants de Ciments et de Chaux and Federation de l’Industrie Cimentiere asbl v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 18 Dec 1992

ECJ Competition – Statement of objections – Access to the file – Admissibility. Actions for annulment of measures Actionable measures Definition Measures producing binding legal effects Administrative procedure implementing the competition rules. Refusal to notify the full statement of objections to an undertaking concerned and to give it access to the entire file. Preparatory measure … Continue reading Cimenteries CBR SA, Blue Circle Industries plc, Syndicat Nationale des Fabricants de Ciments et de Chaux and Federation de l’Industrie Cimentiere asbl v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 18 Dec 1992

Sebago and Maison Dubois et Fils SA v GB-Unic SA: ECJ 1 Jul 1999

The fact that specific goods bearing a Trade Mark had been authorised for distribution within the EEA, did not mean that the relative trade mark rights had been exhausted. They would only be exhausted where the consent related to each individual item in respect of which the exhaustion was pleaded. National rules providing for exhaustion … Continue reading Sebago and Maison Dubois et Fils SA v GB-Unic SA: ECJ 1 Jul 1999

Buralux and others: ECJ 15 Feb 1996

ECJ Judgment – Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Regulation on the supervision and control of waste shipments – Action brought by undertakings specializing in waste shipment – Inadmissibility – Legal protection available from the national courts through an action challenging measures taken … Continue reading Buralux and others: ECJ 15 Feb 1996

Parliament v Council: ECJ 5 Jul 1995

ECJ 1. Due consultation of the Parliament in the cases provided for by the Treaty constitutes an essential formal requirement breach of which renders the measure concerned void. The effective participation of the Parliament in the legislative process of the Community, in accordance with the procedures laid down by the Treaty, represents an essential factor … Continue reading Parliament v Council: ECJ 5 Jul 1995

CT Control (Rotterdam) and JCT Benelux v Commission: ECJ 6 Jul 1993

1. Procedural rules are generally held to apply to all proceedings pending at the time when they enter into force, whereas substantive rules are usually interpreted as not applying to situations existing before their entry into force. 2. The statement of reasons required by Article 190 of the Treaty must disclose clearly and unequivocally the … Continue reading CT Control (Rotterdam) and JCT Benelux v Commission: ECJ 6 Jul 1993

French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1993,p I-3283) (Judgment): ECJ 16 Jun 1993

Europa 1. An action for annulment is available in the case of all measures adopted by the institutions, whatever their nature or form, which are intended to have legal effects. This applies to a Commission communication which sets out to specify the manner of application of Article 5(2) of Directive 80/723 on the transparency of … Continue reading French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1993,p I-3283) (Judgment): ECJ 16 Jun 1993

William Cook plc v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1993,p I-2487) (SV93-201) (Judgment): ECJ 19 May 1993

Europa 1. The Court has consistently held that persons other than those to whom a decision is addressed may claim to be concerned within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 173 only if that decision affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances in … Continue reading William Cook plc v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1993,p I-2487) (SV93-201) (Judgment): ECJ 19 May 1993

Lefebvre Frere and Soeur v Commission: ECJ 14 Feb 1989

A Commission decision, adopted pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 115 of the Treaty, addressed to a Member State and authorizing that State in future to exclude from Community treatment for a specified period bananas originating in certain non-member countries and released into free circulation in the other Member States, is, with regard to … Continue reading Lefebvre Frere and Soeur v Commission: ECJ 14 Feb 1989

Commission v Greece: ECJ 30 Jun 1988

1. Although the powers conferred on the Commission by Article 90(3) of the Treaty operate in a specific field of application and under conditions defined by reference to the particular objective of that article, that does not prevent the ‘directives’ and ‘decisions’ referred to in that provision from falling within the general category of directives … Continue reading Commission v Greece: ECJ 30 Jun 1988

A Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio and others v Commission: ECJ 31 Mar 1993

ECJ 1. The statement of objections, the aim of which is to provide undertakings alleged to have infringed the rules of competition with all the information they need to enable them to defend themselves effectively before the Commission adopts a final decision, must be couched in terms that, albeit succinct, are sufficiently clear to enable … Continue reading A Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio and others v Commission: ECJ 31 Mar 1993

Brother Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1988,P 5655) (Judgment): ECJ 5 Oct 1988

Europa Application for a declaration that a measure is void – Action brought against a regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty – Adoption during the proceedings of a regulation (also challenged) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty at a lower rate, which was rendered applicable ab initio – Application devoid of purpose – Decision unnecessary (EEC … Continue reading Brother Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Rec 1988,P 5655) (Judgment): ECJ 5 Oct 1988

Timex v Council and Commission: ECJ 20 Mar 1985

Europa A regulation introducing an anti-dumping duty constitutes a decision of direct and individual concern, within the meaning of the second paragraph of article 173 of the EEC Treaty, to an undertaking if it is established that the objections of that undertaking, being the only manufacturer of the product in question in one member state … Continue reading Timex v Council and Commission: ECJ 20 Mar 1985

Gordon Craigie Bowden and others v Commission of the European Communities: ECJ 16 Jul 1981

Europa Officials – applications to the court – application directed against a regulation – absence of act adversely affecting the official -inadmissibility (EEC treaty, art. 173; staff regulations of officials, arts 90 and 91; council regulations nos 3085 and 3086/78 amending the staff regulations of officials) regulations nos 3085 and 3086/78 are of general application … Continue reading Gordon Craigie Bowden and others v Commission of the European Communities: ECJ 16 Jul 1981

Milch-, Fett- und Eierkontor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Saarbrucken (Judgment): ECJ 24 Jun 1969

Europa An interpretation given by the court of justice under article 177 of the EEC treaty binds the national court hearing the case concerned. It is for the national court, however, to decide whether it is sufficiently enlightened by the preliminary ruling given or whether it is necessary to make a further reference to the … Continue reading Milch-, Fett- und Eierkontor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Saarbrucken (Judgment): ECJ 24 Jun 1969

Industria Molitoria Imolese and others v Council of the European Communities (Judgment): ECJ 13 Mar 1968

Europa Measures adopted by an institution – proceedings instituted by individuals – regulation – possibility of measures of individual concern contained in a regulation (EEC treaty, article 173, second paragraph, article 189, second paragraph) 2. Measures adopted by an institution – proceedings instituted by individuals – provisions of regional significance, not of individual concern to … Continue reading Industria Molitoria Imolese and others v Council of the European Communities (Judgment): ECJ 13 Mar 1968

Chambre Syndicale De La Siderurgie Francaise and Others v ECSC High Authority (Judgment): ECJ 8 Jul 1965

Europa 1. For an application by an undertaking against a general decision of the high authority to be admissible, the undertaking in question must convincingly point to facts and circumstances indicating the probability that in this instance the high authority, through want of foresight or serious lack of care amounting to disregard for the purpose … Continue reading Chambre Syndicale De La Siderurgie Francaise and Others v ECSC High Authority (Judgment): ECJ 8 Jul 1965

Fiddelaar v Commission EEC: ECJ 16 Dec 1960

EAT Judgment – Procedure – proceedings in which the court has unlimited jurisdiction – irregular conclusions – judgment of its own motion against defendant Officials – on contract – period prior to promulgation of staff regulations – conditions applicable – disputes – jurisdiction of the court (EEC treaty, articles 173, 179) Officials – on contract … Continue reading Fiddelaar v Commission EEC: ECJ 16 Dec 1960

Moccia Irme SpA v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 17 Dec 1996

ECJ ECSC – State aid – Individual decision refusing to authorize the grant of State aid to a steel-making undertaking – Suspension of operation of a measure – Necessary interim measures – Interest in obtaining the interim measures sought – Application dismissed. A decision of the Commission refusing authorization for the grant of State aid … Continue reading Moccia Irme SpA v Commission of the European Communities: ECFI 17 Dec 1996

Hauer v Council and Commission: ECFI 14 Jul 1998

The reduction by Regulation No 816/92 of the reference quantities exempt from the additional levy on milk for 1992/93, without compensation, did not breach the right to property, the principle of protection of legitimate expectations or the principle of equality. First, that measure was justified by the concern to continue with the rationalisation of the … Continue reading Hauer v Council and Commission: ECFI 14 Jul 1998

Costa v ENEL (Order): ECJ 3 Jun 1964

Citations: C-6/64 Jurisdiction: European Cited by: Order – Flaminio Costa v ENEL (Procedure) ECJ 15-Jul-1964 ‘The transfer by the states from their domestic legal system to the Community legal system of their rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights, against which a subsequent . . … Continue reading Costa v ENEL (Order): ECJ 3 Jun 1964

Blot and Front National v Parliament (Rec 1990,p I-2177) (Order): ECJ 23 May 1990

Europa 1 By an application lodged at the Court Registry on 16 March 1990, Mr Y . Blot, a Member of the European Parliament belonging to the Group of the European Right, and the Front national, a non-profit-making association governed by the French Law of 18 July 1901, represented by its chairman Mr Le Pen, … Continue reading Blot and Front National v Parliament (Rec 1990,p I-2177) (Order): ECJ 23 May 1990

Societe ‘Eridania’ Zuccherifici Nazionali and others v Commission of the European Communities supported by Co Pro B – Cooperativa Produttori (Judgment): ECJ 10 Dec 1969

Europa 1. Measures adopted by an institution – application by an individual against a decision addressed to another person – decision of individual concern to him – criteria (EEC treaty, article 173) 2. Procedure – action for failure to act – measures referred to by article 173 of the EEC treaty – inadmissibility 1. The … Continue reading Societe ‘Eridania’ Zuccherifici Nazionali and others v Commission of the European Communities supported by Co Pro B – Cooperativa Produttori (Judgment): ECJ 10 Dec 1969

Firma E Kampffmeyer and others v Commission of the EEC (Judgment): ECJ 14 Jul 1967

Europa 1. Procedure – proceedings in matters arising from non-contractual liability – period for bringing proceedings – limitation (statute of the court of justice of the EEC, article 43) 2. Procedure – proceedings in matters arising from non-contractual liability for reparation for the same damage brought both against the EEC and a member state – … Continue reading Firma E Kampffmeyer and others v Commission of the EEC (Judgment): ECJ 14 Jul 1967

Von Lachmuller and Others v Commission EEC (Judgment): ECJ 15 Jul 1960

Europa Where the conditions of employment appliable to servants have not been expressly determined and defined by the competent authorities, the conditions applicable for the purposes of article 179 of the eec treaty are to be deemed to consist of the express or implied terms which necessarily governed the contracts of employment of those servants. … Continue reading Von Lachmuller and Others v Commission EEC (Judgment): ECJ 15 Jul 1960

Commission v NTN Corporation and Koyo Seiko: ECJ 14 Feb 1996

ECJ 1. Under Article 37 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, any person establishing an interest in the result of a case submitted to the Court may intervene in that case before the Court, and submissions made in an application for leave to intervene must be limited to supporting the submissions of one … Continue reading Commission v NTN Corporation and Koyo Seiko: ECJ 14 Feb 1996

Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd: ECJ 9 Feb 1982

garland_breECJ1982 The fact that an employer (although not bound to do so by contract) provides special travel facilities for former male employees to enjoy after their retirement constitutes discrimination within the meaning of article 119 against former female employees who do not receive the same facilities. Where a national court is able, using the criteria … Continue reading Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd: ECJ 9 Feb 1982

Commission v Council – C-25/94: ECJ 19 Mar 1996

ECJ 1. The Permanent Representatives’ Committee is not an institution of the Communities upon which the Treaty confers powers of its own but an auxiliary body of the Council, for which it carries out preparation and implementation work, as is clear from Article 145 of the Treaty, which provides that the Council shall have power … Continue reading Commission v Council – C-25/94: ECJ 19 Mar 1996

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 27 Jul 2005

The appellants had imported Playstation computer games. They appealed refusal of a rebate of 50 million euros paid in VAT before a reclassification of the equipment so as to make it exempt from VAT. Held: ‘The effect of the annulment of a Community act under Articles 230 and 231 EC Treaty is to render that … Continue reading Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 27 Jul 2005

HM Revenue and Customs v Epson Telford Ltd: ChD 4 May 2007

The parties disputed whether inkjet printer cartridges were to be classsified on import as parts of printers, and free of duty, or as ink and subject to duty. Held: ‘I can see no reason why the advances in design and technology incorporated into the G2 and G3 cartridges should make it any less appropriate to … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Epson Telford Ltd: ChD 4 May 2007

Micula and Others v Romania: SC 19 Feb 2020

The appellant sought to enforce a international arbitration award against the respondent. The award was made under an arrangement which later became unlawful on Romania’s accession to the EU, and Romania obtained s stay pending resolution by the CJEU. Held: The stay was lifted. Judges: Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales … Continue reading Micula and Others v Romania: SC 19 Feb 2020

Revenue and Customs and Another v Ben Nevis (Holdings) Ltd and Others: ChD 20 Jul 2012

The claimant sought to make arrangements with a view to collecting substantial arrears of tax due to South Africa. The revenue said that it had that power by virtue of the double taxation treaty with South Aftrica. The company replied that the liabilities arose for years prior to the Convention embodied in the Regulations, andtat … Continue reading Revenue and Customs and Another v Ben Nevis (Holdings) Ltd and Others: ChD 20 Jul 2012

Bucnys v Ministry of Justice: SC 20 Nov 2013

The Court considered requests made by European Arrest Warrants for the surrender under Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 of three persons wanted to serve sentences imposed upon their conviction in other member states of the European Union. The court was asked whether the requests are open to challenge on the basis that (i) … Continue reading Bucnys v Ministry of Justice: SC 20 Nov 2013

Shergill and Others v Khaira and Others: SC 11 Jun 2014

The parties disputed the trusts upon which three Gurdwaras (Sikh Temples) were held. The Court of Appeal had held that the issues underlying the dispute were to be found in matters of the faith of the Sikh parties, and had ordered a permanent stay. Held: The appeal was allowed. The matter was justiciable and should … Continue reading Shergill and Others v Khaira and Others: SC 11 Jun 2014

AHE Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A, A, YA and, ZA (By Their Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority B, B: QBD 26 Feb 2003

References: [2003] EWHC 259 (QB), Gazette 01-May-2003, [2003] 1 FLR 1091 Links: Bailii Coram: The President An IVF treatment centre used sperm from one couple to fertilise eggs from another. This was discovered, and the unwilling donors sought a paternity declaration. Held: Section 28 did not confer paternity. The mistake vitiated whatever consents had been … Continue reading AHE Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A, A, YA and, ZA (By Their Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority B, B: QBD 26 Feb 2003

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts