Click the case name for better results:

Patel, Re Defendant’s Cost Order: CACD 6 Jul 2012

The defendant had been granted a defendant costs order, but he had not complied with the Rules by first outlining the type of costs and amount claimed’ and the Court had not required compliance. He had successfully appealed against a conviction for supplying counterfeit Viagra. The proceedings had been very complex and protracted and his … Continue reading Patel, Re Defendant’s Cost Order: CACD 6 Jul 2012