Application to set minimum sentence. Citations: [2006] EWHC 586 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.244003
The defendant was convicted of burglary. He had a previous conviction, within the statutory assumption period of six years, for handling. Both the property stolen in the burglary and the property handled had been recovered intact and restored, undamaged, to the true owners. The defendant had obtained no other benefit from the offences. These two … Continue reading Wilkes, Regina v: CACD 7 Mar 2003
The claimant sought damages from its accountants, saying that had they been advised of the difficulties in their financial situation, they would have been able to avoid the loss of some 2.5 billion pounds, or to sell their assets at a time when their losses could be minimalised. They appealed a judgment limiting the claim … Continue reading Equitable Life Assurance Society v Ernst and Young: CA 25 Jul 2003
The Crown appealed a decision that a conviction under subsection 2 required proof that the money the disposal of which the defendant was accused to have assisted was in fact the proceeds of drug trafficking. Held: Subsections 1 and 2 were clearly differently worded. Under section 1 it was necessary to prove that the goods … Continue reading Regina v Montilla, Newbury etc: CACD 3 Nov 2003
The applicant challenged the failure to register him properly to reflect his specialism for which he had been qualified in Greece. Held: The Directive set out principles for the recognition of medical qualifications within the Union. The Order applied the Directive. The article 43 right of establishment is mediated through a combination of the very … Continue reading Dr A Lambiris v The Specialist Training Authority of the Medical Royal Colleges and the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health – Interested Parties: CA 8 May 2003
ECJ Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European Arrest Warrant – Reason for mandatory non-execution – Principle ne bis in idem principle – Fundamental right – when the application merits has been delivered in the State Member of issue – Meaning of ‘same acts’ – Autonomous concept – Scope. Citations: C-261/09, … Continue reading Mantello (Police And Judicial Cooperation In Criminal Matters): ECJ 7 Sep 2010
ECJ Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of a European arrest warrant – Interpretation of the terms ‘resident’ and ‘staying’ in the executing Member State. Citations: C-66/08, [2008] EUECJ C-66/08, [2009] QB … Continue reading Kozlowski (Police And Judicial Cooperation In Criminal Matters): ECJ 17 Jul 2008
The appellant had been convicted of VAT fraud. His company collected sums for charity but hid substantial receipts. He appealed his sentence on the grounds of disparity with his co-defendants. The fraud was substantial and organised. Held: The sentence on this defendant was not disproportionate (applying the test in Fawcett). Indeed, the problem was not … Continue reading Young v Regina: CACD 4 Dec 2003
Two defendants appealed in respect of alleged offences under common law of causing a public nuisance. One had sent race hatred material, and the other bomb hoaxes, through the post. Both claimed that the offence was so ill defined as to be an infringement of their rights. Held: The offence of causing a public nuisance … Continue reading Goldstein, Rimmington v Regina: CACD 28 Nov 2003
The claimant had been engaged with his solicitor in a fraudulent land transaction. He now sought to sue the solicitor for negligence. The solicitor replied that the claimant was unable to rely upon his own unlawful act to make a claim. Held: Although the claimant’s fraud on the bank was a ‘but for’ cause of … Continue reading Sweetman v Nathan and others: CA 25 Jul 2003
Six appeals concerned a number of aspects of the new Conditional Fee Agreement. Held: It should be normal for a CFA, redacted as necessary, to be disclosed for costs proceedings where a success fee is claimed. If a party seeks to rely on the CFA, as a matter of fairness she should ordinarily be put … Continue reading Hollins v Russell etc: CA 22 May 2003
PC (The High Court of Justiciary) The minuter challenged the role of the legal adviser to the district courts in Scotland, and as to his independence. Held: The legal adviser was not subject to the same system of appointments as the justices. However the system provided for a right of appeal (section 175) on questions … Continue reading Clark (Procurator Fiscal, Kirkcaldy) v Kelly: PC 11 Feb 2003
A firm of accountants had agreed to provide their services as experts in a case on the basis that they would be paid by taking part of any damages awarded. The respondent claimed that such an agreement was champertous and unlawful. Held: The tort of champerty as such had been abolished, but the rule remained … Continue reading Regina (Factortame Ltd and Others) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No 8): CA 3 Jul 2002
The Attorney General referred the sentences as too lenient for armed robbery, and aggravated vehicle taking. The defendants worked as a team, and used an imitation firearm, and threatened a victim with it. Held: The possession of firearms should be regarded as an aggravating feature in relation to other offences. When passing sentence, it is … Continue reading Attorney General’s Reference No 88 of 2002 (Hahn and Webster): CACD 7 Nov 2003
The court was prepared to consider sentences on the basis that the magistrates had misrecorded the basis of the defendant’s committal to the Crown Court. Judges: Lane CJ Citations: (1983) 74 Cr App Rep 58 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Regina v Whitehead CACD 8-May-2003 The defendant appealed several sentences totalling 30 … Continue reading Regina v Folkestone and Hythe Justices, ex parte R: CACD 1983
In the light of the further increase in firearms use, particularly in the case of drug-related crime, this court considered the case of nine offenders, members of a notorious drug-dealing gang in South-East Manchester called the Pitt Bull Crew who carried, sometimes openly, loaded firearms ostensibly for their own protection but also to enforce their … Continue reading Attorney General’s References (Nos 58-66 of 2002) (Regina v Warren, Coudjoe and others): CACD 2003
The defendant sought to appeal his extradition to Spain to face terrorism charges. He complained that the certificate required under the 2003 Act could not be the European arrest warrant itself, that the offence did not satisfy the double actionability rule and that the warrant did not set out the text of the law under … Continue reading Dabas v High Court of Justice, Madrid: HL 28 Feb 2007
The Court considered requests made by European Arrest Warrants for the surrender under Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 of three persons wanted to serve sentences imposed upon their conviction in other member states of the European Union. The court was asked whether the requests are open to challenge on the basis that (i) … Continue reading Bucnys v Ministry of Justice: SC 20 Nov 2013
The House was asked whether someone who wished to appeal against an extradition order had an obligation also to serve his appellant’s notice on the respondent within the seven days limit, and whether the period was capable of extension by the court. Held: The appeal failed (Lord Rodger dissenting). Giving notice, for the purposes of … Continue reading Mucelli v Government of Albania (Criminal Appeal From Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice): HL 21 Jan 2009
The claimant had obtained an interim injunction against the defendant for copyright infringement, though it could show no losses. It now sought additionally damages. The defendant argued that it could not have both.
Held: The case arose form . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The prosecutor appealed a finding that the proceeds of cheating the revenue were not the proceeds of crime within the 2002 Act. Held: The appeal succeeded. The case was different from Galbraith in that there was a clear finding of a cheat. The fact that the original earnings were obtained by a legitimate trade did … Continue reading IK, Regina v: CACD 8 Mar 2007
Appeal from acceptance of defence submission of no case to answer. Judges: Lord Justice Fulford VP Citations: [2021] EWCA Crim 600 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 58 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 25 November 2022; Ref: scu.662187
The CPS sought leave to appeal against a terminating ruling. It had failed to produce and serve evidence on the defendant even after an adjournment for the purpose. The judge directed an acquittal and refused an adjournment to allow the CPS to consider an appeal. The CPS had failed to give notice under section 58 … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v C, M and H: CACD 11 Dec 2009
The prosecutor sought leave to appeal against a trial judge’s ruling of no case to answer. Held: On considering such an application the sole consideration was not whether there was a realistic chance of success. In this case there was little public interest in pursuing the appeal. The appeal failed. Judges: Lord Justice Scott Baker, … Continue reading Regina v Al-Ali: CACD 2 Sep 2008
The defendant was charged with possessing an offensive weapon. He had been wearing combat gloves which had powdered lead or sand in patches over the knuckle area. The prosecutor appealed a finding that such articles could not be an offensive weapon. Held: The gloves had been advertised as for use for self defence. That and … Continue reading Regina v R (Gloves, Offensive Weapon): CACD 15 Nov 2007
The judge had ruled that the evidence intended to be offered could not create offences within the 1977 Act. Verdicts of not guilty were entered. The decision was a terminating ruling. The prosecutor failed to give the appropriate section 58 undertaking on appealing. Held: Attending to the purpose of the 2003 Act, the prosecutor’s mistake … Continue reading H, Regina v: CACD 13 Feb 2008
The complainant had not attended the trial to give evidence, and the judge refused a request for an adjournment, finding that there were no reasonable grounds for anticipating that she could be found and would be a willing witness. Held: Such an order, even though it was a case management decision, might constitute a terminating … Continue reading Regina v Clark: CACD 9 Oct 2007
The court considered the application of section 58 to prosecution appeals and the use of the ‘acquittal agreement’. Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 370 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 58 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Regina v RL and JF CACD 28-Aug-2008 Club, not members, prosecutable for breach The Environment Agency … Continue reading Regina v R: CACD 29 Feb 2008
The prosecution sought to introduce evidence of the words used in a phone call between someone wanting drugs and the defendant, who was accused (amongst other things) of being concerned in making an offer to supply a controlled drug of class, ie amphetamines. The police had covertly taped the call. The prosecution wanted to support … Continue reading Regina v MK: CACD 4 Dec 2007
The prosecution sought leave to appeal the quashing of an indictment. Held: Section 53 of the 2003 Act could not be used for this purpose. The defendants had successfully challenged the adequacy of the Crown’s case before trial. The defendants had not therefore been arraigned, and the dismissal did not amount to a formal acquittal … Continue reading Thompson and Another, Regina v: CACD 22 Nov 2006
Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 463 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 58 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.266104
Application in relation to a terminating ruling brought by a prosecuting authority in respect of a case tried at Leeds Crown Court. The indictment contained a single count of misconduct in public office. Judges: Treacy LJ, King, Nicol JJ Citations: [2018] EWCA Crim 440, [2018] 1 WLR 5865, [2018] WLR(D) 167 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: … Continue reading Ikram, Regina v: CACD 14 Mar 2018
The prosecution sought to appeal. Held: The prosecutor could not appeal unless it had before informing the court of its intention to appeal, informed the accused that if leave to appeal was not given, he would be acquitted of the charges. Judges: Lord Justice Hughes, Mr Justice Treacy and Sir Peter Cresswell Citations: Times 13-Jun-2008 … Continue reading Regina v Arnold: CMAC 16 May 2008
The prosecutor had appealed immediately against the judge’s withdrawal of a charge of racially aggravated use of insulting words or behaviour. The judge then ignored his obligation to continue the trial without mentioning the issue to the jury. He said in terms that the charge should not have been brought to the Crown Court. The … Continue reading Regina v SH: CACD 3 Aug 2010
Club, not members, prosecutable for breach The Environment Agency appealed against dismissal of charges against the defendants who were officers in an unincorporated members’ golf club on whose land there had been pollution. The judge had ruled that the unincorporated association could have been prosecuted under the 1978 Act, and that a prosecution would not … Continue reading Regina v RL and JF: CACD 28 Aug 2008
The Serious Fraud Office appealed against rulings on the admission of evidence after its exclusion under section 78. Held: The appeal was allowed. The appeal had been brought within time and could proceed. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. The judge confused or elided two quite separate concepts, namely (a) the ‘identification’ principle which is … Continue reading A Ltd and Othersi, Regina v: CACD 28 Jul 2016
(Courts-Martial Appeals Court) The defendant had faced road traffic offence charges, but the court had discharged the case using the Forest of Dean case. The prosecutor sought to appeal but failed to give the undertaking with regard to taking no further action if the appeal did not succeed as required under the Order. Held: The … Continue reading LSA, Regina v: CACD 16 May 2008
Appeal under s.58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 in respect of a terminating ruling made by Mr Recorder Day QC at the Crown Court at Blackfriars on 5 May 2015 holding that in a prosecution case based on DNA, there was no case to answer. John Thomas LJC, Simon LJ, Patterson J [2015] EWCA … Continue reading FNC, Regina v: CACD 4 Nov 2015
Appeal from termination ruling – offence alleged against the respondent of arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence – whether the mere request by the respondent to someone to look for a young girl of 12 or 13 with whom he could indulge in sexual activity amounts to an offence under section … Continue reading R, Regina v: CACD 16 Jan 2008
Police ‘lawful use’ of dog must be police work The prosecutor wished to appeal from the acquittal of a police officer, whose police dog, while being exercised, attacked a runner causing injury. The judge had accepted the defence, since the dog required exercise, the officer was using the dog for a lawful purpose with the … Continue reading PY, Regina v: CACD 22 Jan 2019
The Crown appealed against a stay imposed on its prosecution of the defendant accused of possessing and creating indecent images of children. It had refused to provide access to the materials to the extent required by the defence to allow it to prepare its case. CPS said that it feared that an officer might himself … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v LR: CACD 28 Apr 2010
The prosecutor appealed against a ruling that the prosecution was an abuse of process, the defendant having said that the police officer had entrapped him into committing the offence of supplying a Class A drug. A police undercover drugs operation was in progress in the North West of England in the course of which M … Continue reading M, Regina v: CACD 18 Mar 2011
The defendant appealed against his convictions for possession of controlled drugs with intent to supply. He complained at the use of of text messages found on his phone against him, saying they were hearsay. Held: The texts contained assertions by a third party intending them to be believed, and were to be admitted as evidence … Continue reading Regina v Leonard: CACD 28 Apr 2009
Application for leave to appeal. . .
Application by the Crown for leave to appeal a terminating ruling . .
The defendant got drunk and set fire to the hotel where he worked. Guests were present. He was indicted upon two counts of arson. He pleaded guilty to the 1(1) count but contested the 1(2) charge, saying he was so drunk that the thought there might be people never crossed his mind. Setting aside his … Continue reading Commissioner of Police v Caldwell: HL 19 Mar 1981
Fair Coment on Political Activities The defendant newspaper had published articles wrongly accusing the claimant, the former Prime Minister of Ireland of duplicity. The paper now appealed, saying that it should have had available to it a defence of qualified privilege because of the claimant’s status as a politician. Held: The appeal failed (Lords Hope … Continue reading Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and others: HL 28 Oct 1999
The money laundering regulations create a conflict between private rights and criminal provisions, particularly the restriction on information which might prejudice an investigation may be under way. Conflicts were resolved by guidance from NCIS. The court set out a procedure to be followed where compliance with an order for disclosure of information in civil proceedings … Continue reading C v S and Others (Money Laundering: Discovery of Documents): CA 3 Oct 1998
The defendant had been convicted of murder in 1952, and hung. A court hearing an appeal after many years must apply laws from different eras to different aspects. The law of the offence (of murder) to be applied was that at the time of the offence. In this case however the summing up was so … Continue reading Regina v Derek William Bentley (Deceased): CACD 30 Jul 1998
Prosecution appeal by the Appellant (‘the SFO’) under s.58 and following of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 against a Ruling together with other related rulings), in which he upheld the various submissions of the Respondents that there was no case to answer in respect of the count/s of the indictment which concerned each of them. … Continue reading Varley and Others, Regina v: CACD 21 Jun 2019
The court was asked as to the extent of the Secretary of State’s discretion and obligation to consider a person’s Article 6 rights when requested personally to serve a judgment of an overseas court pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the government of the country of that overseas court. The Claimant said … Continue reading Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department: Admn 26 Mar 2013
Where communications had been intercepted in a foreign country, and the manner of such interceptions had been lawful in that country, the evidence produced was admissible in evidence in a trial in England. An admission of such evidence was not an infringement of the rights to a fair trial, nor of the right to respect … Continue reading Regina v P and others: HL 19 Dec 2000
Prosecution’s application for retrial. Judges: The Vice-President of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Lord Justice Fulford Mr Justice Picken And Mr Justice Martin Spencer Citations: [2020] EWCA Crim 1351 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 76 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.682458
Prosecution appeal under s.58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, with the leave of the trial judge, against the ruling given at Newcastle upon Tyne Crown Court on 13th March 2012 that taking the prosecution case at its highest, it would not be open to the jury to convict either respondent of manslaughter. Held: It … Continue reading JM and Another, Regina v: CACD 7 Nov 2012
Application by CPS under s.58 Criminal Justice Act 2003 Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 2186, [2009] 1 WLR 1661, [2009] 1 Cr App Rep 21 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.277116
A cyclist stopped by the police had a knife in an inside pocket. He claimed to have taken it from home and then forgotten about it. He was advised that for the purposes of the section neither forgetfulness nor the fact that he was transporting the knife from one private property to another could amount … Continue reading Regina v Hargreaves: CACD 30 Jul 1999
The Registrar referred to the court an application by the prosecution, for leave to appeal under section 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 against a terminating ruling. Citations: [2020] 4 WLR 2, [2019] EWCA Crim 205 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Wokingham Borough Council v Scott and Others QBD … Continue reading Wokingham Borough Council v Scott and Others: CACD 17 Jan 2019
Application for injunction to cease alleged breaches of planning control. Judges: Karen Walden-Smith HHJ Citations: [2017] EWHC 294 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and County Planning Act 1990 187B Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Wokingham Borough Council v Scott and Others CACD 17-Jan-2019 The Registrar referred to the court an application … Continue reading Wokingham Borough Council v Scott and Others: QBD 20 Feb 2017
The claimant advanced funds to the respondent for him to invest in a bank of which the claimant had insider knowledge. In fact the defendant did not invest the funds, the knowledge was incorrect. The defendant however did not return the sums advanced, saying he need not return it because the contract was for an … Continue reading Patel v Mirza: SC 20 Jul 2016
Nine otherwise unrelated cases listed together to enable the court to consider and review the amendments made by the sections 13-18 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (the 2008 Act) to Chapter 5 of Part 12 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (the 2003 Act). Citations: [2009] Crim LR 221, [2009] 2 All … Continue reading C and Others, Regina v: CACD 26 Nov 2008
When a defendant was silent, it was necessary for the court to be especially careful to give precise and accurate directions on the effect of such silence as to the drawing of adverse inferences. Having answered questions on some aspects, it was not possible for the court to separate out the issues safely so as … Continue reading Regina v Gill: CACD 21 Jul 2000
The prosecutor appealed against a termination ruling to the effect that the failure by the prosecutor in its disclosure obligations anounted to an abuse of process. Held: The appeal was allowed. The defendants had been charged with fraudulent importation of large quantities of Class A and Class B drugs. The proposed defence was that their … Continue reading MO, and Others v Regina: CACD 8 Dec 2011
The appellants had imported Playstation computer games. They appealed refusal of a rebate of 50 million euros paid in VAT before a reclassification of the equipment so as to make it exempt from VAT. Held: ‘The effect of the annulment of a Community act under Articles 230 and 231 EC Treaty is to render that … Continue reading Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 27 Jul 2005
The provisions of the Code of Practice regarding identification parades are mandatory and additional unwritten conditions are not to be inserted. Where there was an identification and the suspect challenged that identification, and consented to the parade, the parade must be held. There is nothing in the words of code of practice to allow police … Continue reading Regina v Forbes (Anthony Leroy) (Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 1999): HL 19 Dec 2000
The Home Secretary argued that the defendant’s attempted appeal against an extradition order was out of time and that accordingly the court had no jurisdiction to hear an appeal. Notice of service of the appeal was one day out of time. Held: What had been served was not a notice of appeal but merely notice … Continue reading Halligen v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 21 Jun 2011
Lawfulness of rulings made by the judge when sitting as a District Judge pursuant to section 66 Courts Act 2003, and the degree to which they affect the lawfulness of the sentences imposed. They both concern matters that had been committed for sentence to the Crown Court by the Magistrates’ Court, and certain steps taken … Continue reading Chalk and Another, Regina v: CACD 31 Mar 2022
The court admitted in evidence, by applying the res gestae rule, a statement of the defendant’s co-accused. Citations: [1999] EWCA Crim 1686 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Regina v W (Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972) CACD 8-May-2003 The allegation was of a serious assault on the defendant’s … Continue reading Regina v James NJ: CACD 17 Jun 1999
The defendant appealed against his conviction for murder, saying that he should have been allowed to rely on a plea of diminished responsibility given the changes to section 2 of the 1957 Act introduced in 2009. He said that his alcoholism should have been treated as explaining his loss of self control and amounting to … Continue reading Dowds v Regina: CACzD 22 Feb 2012
The court was asked: ‘Was it unlawful for the Secretary of State for Health, the respondent, who had power to make provisions for the functioning of the National Health Service in England, to have failed to make a provision which would have enabled women who were citizens of the UK, but who were usually resident … Continue reading A and B, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Health: SC 14 Jun 2017
(Scotland) The respondent was to be extradited to Taiwan to serve the balance of a prison term. His appeal succeeded and the order quashed on the basis that his treatment in the Taiwanese prison system would infringe his human rights. The Lord Advocate now appealed. Held: The question was a devolution issue, being ‘a question … Continue reading Lord Advocate (Representing The Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean: SC 28 Jun 2017
The claimant journalist sought disclosure of papers acquired by the respondent in its conduct of enquiries into the charitable Mariam appeal. The Commission referred to an absolute exemption under section 32(2) of the 2000 Act, saying that the exemption continued until the papers were destroyed, or for 20 years under the 1958 Act. Held: The … Continue reading Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014
The defendant was accused of a rape before 2000. No complaint was made until after 2004. The defendant wished to ask the complainant about her sexual history. It was argued that the former provision had been repealed, and tat the new provisons were not back dated, and that therefore there was no restriction. Held: Though … Continue reading Cartwright, Regina v: CACD 7 Nov 2007
Representative claims were made against the respondents, hospitals, pathologists etc with regard to the removal of organs from deceased children without the informed consent of the parents. They claimed under the tort of wrongful interference. Held: Organ removal when a post mortem had been ordered by the coroner was not tortious. In English law there … Continue reading AB and others v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust: QBD 26 Mar 2004
Mr Ballie, a former solicitor, was found guity of contempt in the face of the court and sentenced to six months imprisonment. It was said that he had continued to call himself a solicitor and had so practised after he had been struck from the Roll of Solicitors. Judges: Simon Barker QC J Citations: [2011] … Continue reading Balli (Also Known As Ravinder Singh), Re Contempt of Court: ChD 1 Jul 2011
Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 758 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – O’Dowd v Regina CACD 12-May-2009 The defendant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual offences. The trial was very lengthy after the prosecution introduced bad character evidence from other allegations from some 17 years or … Continue reading Mckenzie v Regina: CACD 11 Apr 2008
The court considered an appeal against sentence where the judge, in activating a suspended sentence had not allowed for time spent in custody on remand. Maddison J said: ‘The Registrar referred this case to the full court so that it could consider the lawfulness of the judge’s approach. This case illustrates the sorts of problems … Continue reading Regina v Mari: CACD 2010
The Board complained that the defendants had failed to comply with the requirements of community service orders. They appealed against a finding that the complaints were not made out. The defendants had not attended because they were appealing their convictions. Held: ‘like any other sentence, a community order takes effect when it is imposed and … Continue reading West Midlands Probation Board v Sutton Coldfield Magistrates’ Court and others: Admn 11 Jan 2008
The applicant sought asylum, saying that it would be unsafe to order his return. The issue before the House was as to when the need for protection should be assesed where, as here, there had been a series of appeals over time. Held: The appeal was dismissed. ‘Common sense indicates that the final decision, whenever … Continue reading Saber v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 12 Dec 2007
The claimant had been released on licence, and recalled. He complained that the parole board had, in considering his re-release taken into account circumstances beyond those which had directly caused his recall. Held: The prisoner’s appeal failed. The Board was entitled to take into account all the circumstances, including but not limited to, the reason … Continue reading Regina (Gulliver) v Parole Board: CA 4 Jul 2007
Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 1760, [2007] 2 Crim App R 30 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – O’Dowd v Regina CACD 12-May-2009 The defendant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual offences. The trial was very lengthy after the prosecution introduced bad character evidence from other … Continue reading Wallace v Regina: CACD 16 Jul 2007
The court (per Gage LJ) considered it strongly arguable that the practice of allowing to the jury the right to acquit an accused at any time after the close of the prosecution case, could not survive Article 6. Gage LJ identified the dangers involved in a judge telling a jury that it has a right … Continue reading Collins and Others, Regina v: CACD 20 Apr 2007
The claimants had been detained under the 1971 Act, after completing sentences of imprisonment pending their return to their home countries under deportations recommended by the judges at trial, or chosen by the respondent. They challenged as unlawful the respondent’s, at first unpublished, policy introduced in 2006, that by default, those awaiting deportation should be … Continue reading Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: SC 23 Mar 2011
The defendants, accused of offences under the 2000 Act, appealed an interim finding that documents stored on computers could amount to ‘articles’ within the Act. They said that the existence of sections 57 and 58 suggested two distinct regimes, one for documents, and one for articles. Held: The district judge should have followed Rowe. The … Continue reading M, Regina v; Regina v Z; Regina v I; Regina v R; Regina v B (No 2): CACD 27 Apr 2007
The prisoners appealed the review of the recommended minimum terms they must serve on that term being reviewed by the court, saying that the court should have made allowance for the exceptional progress to rehabilitation made in prison. Held: If the evidence is in essence fresh information about the offender, a court will normally not … Continue reading Caines, Regina v, Regina v Roberts: CACD 23 Nov 2006
The court provided explanation of the nature of sentences passed for public protection under the 2003 Act, and in particular whether it was correct to base the assessment on previous convictions. Held: ‘dangerousness’ is intended to represent a convenient shorthand for those cases where ‘The court is of the opinion that there is a significant … Continue reading Johnson, Regina v; Regina vHamilton; Attorney General’s Reference (No 64 of 2006): CACD 20 Oct 2006
The claimants had each been detained without trial for more than two years, being held as suspected terrorists. They were free leave to return to their own countries, but they feared for their lives if returned. They complained that the evidence used to justify their detention was derived from practices involving torture by the US … Continue reading A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, Mahmoud Abu Rideh Jamal Ajouaou v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 11 Aug 2004
Each applicant sought judicial review of the refusal of the tribunal to authorise their release from detention under the 1983 Act, saying that the Tribunal had accepted evidence to a lower standard of proof. Held: Neither the criminal standard of proof nor the level of proof set down in Addington applied. To raise the standard … Continue reading Regina (DJ) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; Regina (AN) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region): Admn 11 Apr 2005
The defendant family was served without notice with an anti-social behaviour order ordering them to leave their home immediately, and making other very substantial restrictions. The evidence in large part related to other people entirely. Held: To grant an injunction without notice is to grant an exceptional remedy. As to hearsay evidence: ‘ the experience … Continue reading Moat Housing Group-South Ltd v Harris and Another: CA 16 Mar 2005
The defendant appealed his sentence after conviction for making indeent photographs and pseudo-photographs, saying tha imposition of a restraining order in addition to other sentences was incorrect. Held: The 2003 Act had brought in an extended definition of ‘serious sexual harm’. However at the time when the order wa smposed, the power to make it … Continue reading Monument v Regina: CACD 21 Jan 2005
The defendant complained that his criminal record had been placed before the jury under the Act, even though the proceedings had been begun before the commencement date. Held: The provisions of the Act were procedural in nature and therefore not subject to any rule against reprospectivity. The court criticised the drafting of the Act. Judges: … Continue reading Bradley, Regina v: CACD 14 Jan 2005
The defendants had been convicted of animal welfare offences, and banned from keeping animals. The claimant sought to enter the premises to remove animals, but were denied entry. Held: The court had no power to make an order to allow access for this purpose:’ truth what the Council is doing is to point to deficiencies … Continue reading Worcestershire County Council v Tongue, Tongue, and Tongue: CA 17 Feb 2004
The Appellant had introduced a system of fining lorry drivers returning to the UK with illegal immigrants hiding away in their trucks. The rules had been found to be in breach of European law and an interference with their human rights. The penalties were substantial, though there existed a system of appeals. Held: The principle … Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Department v International Transport Roth Gmbh and others: CA 22 Feb 2002
A sentence of detention during her majesty’s pleasure when imposed on a youth was not the same as a sentence of life imprisonment, and the Home Secretary was wrong to treat it on the same basis and to make allowance for expressions of public opinion. Of a sentence under the section: ‘The Secretary of State … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Venables, Regina v Secretary of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Thompson: HL 12 Jun 1997
A discretionary life sentence intended to protect the public could now only be imposed after establishing compliance with the Act in that the sentence was so serious as to deserve a very long sentence, and for an unforeseeable time into the future, he would remain a serious danger to the public.Lord Bingham CJ said: ‘In … Continue reading Regina v Chapman: CACD 22 Jul 1999
The claimant had sought damages against his employer, saying that they had failed in their duty to him under the 1997 Act in failing to prevent harassment by a manager. He appealed a strike out of his claim. Held: The appeal succeeded. The issue is whether an employer may be vicariously liable under section 3 … Continue reading Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust: CA 16 Mar 2005
The defendants appealed convictions for causing grievous bodily harm. During interviw, the solicitor had advised that since the police had failed to make proper disclosure of the evidence, his client should not answer. He now appealed complaining of the judge’s direction as to the the conclusions to be drawn by the jury from his silence. … Continue reading Raymond Christopher Betts, John Anthony Hall v Regina: CACD 9 Feb 2001
Statements in an out of court witness statement were only put to the witness in cross-examination and the court was now asked whether the prosecution was entitled to re-examine on parts of the document not put to the witness in cross-examination. Held: ‘ In our judgment the Recorder did err in concluding that the situation … Continue reading Pashmfouroush and Another, Regina v: CACD 1 Sep 2006
The prisoners challenged their continued detention. They had been sentenced and had served their tariff terms but had been continued to be detained for public protection, but with no current or effective assessment of what risk was posed. Held: Such continued detention was unlawful.Laws LJ described ‘further detention’ after the expiry of the tariff period … Continue reading Wells v The Parole Board and Another; Regina (Walker) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD 31 Jul 2007
The House rejected the submission of counsel that the Court of Appeal had asked the wrong question by taking as the test the effect of the fresh evidence on their mind and not the effect that the evidence would have had on the mind of the jury. It would be anomalous for the court to … Continue reading Stafford v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1974
