Click the case name for better results:

Black, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: Admn 5 Mar 2015

The serving prisoner said that new general restrictions on smoking in public buildings applied also in prisons. were a breach of his human rights. The only spaces where prisoners were allowed now to smoke were their cells, and he would share cells with smokers, suffering second hand inhalation. He suffered health problems. Judges: Singh J … Continue reading Black, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: Admn 5 Mar 2015

Dawes and Others v Regina: CACD 26 Mar 2013

The defendants appealed their respective convictions for murder, saying that they had been provoked, and that their judges had wrongly directed their juries as to what amounted to qualifying trigger under the 2009 Act, which had replaced the former provocation defence. Held: Each appeal was rejected. To raise the defence, the defendant had to establish … Continue reading Dawes and Others v Regina: CACD 26 Mar 2013

Antoniou, Regina (on The Application of) v Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust and Others: Admn 10 Oct 2013

The patient had died while detained in a mental hospital. Held There was no need to conduct an immediate independent investigation before the inquest. Judges: Aikens LJ, Mitting J Citations: [2013] EWHC 3055 (Admin), [2015] 1 WLR 4459, [2013] Med LR 536, [2013] WLR(D) 379, (2014) 135 BMLR 89 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Coroners and … Continue reading Antoniou, Regina (on The Application of) v Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust and Others: Admn 10 Oct 2013

Maguire, Regina (on The Application of) v United Respons and Others: CA 10 Jun 2020

Whether the circumstances surrounding the death of Jacqueline Maguire (known as Jackie) required the coroner to allow the jury at her inquest to return an expanded conclusion in accordance with section 5(2) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 Judges: The Rt Hon the Lord Burnett of Maldon Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales … Continue reading Maguire, Regina (on The Application of) v United Respons and Others: CA 10 Jun 2020

LF, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Senior Coroner for Inner South London and Another: Admn 29 Oct 2015

The claimant whose daughter, suffering Down’s Syndrome, had died while in intensive care in hospital, challenged the rejection of her argument that her daughter had been in ‘state detention’ at the time. Gross LJ, Charles J [2015] EWHC 2990 (Admin), (2016) 180 JP 85, [2016] 1 WLR 2385, [2015] WLR(D) 442, [2016] COPLR 119, [2015] … Continue reading LF, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Senior Coroner for Inner South London and Another: Admn 29 Oct 2015

Engel And Others v The Netherlands (1): ECHR 8 Jun 1976

The court was asked whether proceedings in a military court against soldiers for disciplinary offences involved criminal charges within the meaning of Article 6(1): ‘In this connection, it is first necessary to know whether the provision(s) defining the offence charged belong, according to the legal system of the respondent State, to criminal law, disciplinary law … Continue reading Engel And Others v The Netherlands (1): ECHR 8 Jun 1976

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Goring v Regina: CACD 13 Jan 2011

The defendant appealed against his convictions for murder and possession of an offensive weapon, saying that the judge had wrongly rejected his submission that there was no case to answer. Judges: Leveson, LJ, Davis, Lloyd Jones JJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Crim 2 Links: Bailii Statutes: Coroners and Justice Act 2009 54 55 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Goring v Regina: CACD 13 Jan 2011

Rejmanski, Regina v: CACD 19 Dec 2017

Defendants appealed from convictions for murder saying that the judge had wrongly deprived them of partial defences under the 2009 Act by disalllowing their mental disorders as relevent to the assessment of ‘the circumstances of the defendant’ Judges: Hallett VP CACD, Spencer,Lavender JJ Citations: [2017] EWCA Crim 2061 Links: Bailii Statutes: Coroners and Justice Act … Continue reading Rejmanski, Regina v: CACD 19 Dec 2017

Mehmedov v Regina: CACD 18 Jul 2014

The defendant appealed against his conviction for the murder of his partner. He said that the court should have accepted his plea under section 54 of the 2009 Act, having wrongly admitted as evidence his previous covictions in Bulgaria at a time when, he said, people of his racial descent were regularly wrongly convicted. Pitchford … Continue reading Mehmedov v Regina: CACD 18 Jul 2014

Brennan v Regina: CACD 21 Nov 2014

The defendant, then 22 had a history of disturbed childhood, sexual abuse and outpatient mental health treatment together with one instance when he was sectioned following a suicide attempt. On the undisputed psychiatric evidence he suffered from a schizotypal disorder as well as an emotionally unstable personality disorder. He was obsessed with witchcraft and Satanist … Continue reading Brennan v Regina: CACD 21 Nov 2014

Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd: HL 1 Feb 1979

The appellants were magazines and journalists who published, after committal proceedings, the name of a witness, a member of the security services, who had been referred to as Colonel B during the hearing. An order had been made for his name not to be disclosed during the hearing, but the court had had no power … Continue reading Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd: HL 1 Feb 1979

Jordan v United Kingdom; McKerr v United Kingdom; similar: ECHR 4 May 2001

Proper Investigation of Deaths with Army or Police Claims were made as regards deaths of alleged terrorists in clashes with the UK armed forces and police. In some cases the investigations necessary to justify the taking of life had been inadequate. Statements made to the inquiry as to the circumstances of the deaths had not … Continue reading Jordan v United Kingdom; McKerr v United Kingdom; similar: ECHR 4 May 2001