The court considered whether it had power to award a post judgment interest at a contractual rather than the statutory interest rate. Held: There is no power of the court in this claim to add any amount beyond the statutory interest to the amount of the judgment debt, and that applies both to the contractual … Continue reading Chubb and Another v Dean and Another: ChD 24 Apr 2013
Citations: [2020] EWHC 672 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Limitation Act 1980 32, Consumer Credit Act 1974 140A-D Jurisdiction: England and Wales Consumer, Limitation Updated: 17 November 2022; Ref: scu.649907
The appellant sought under section 104A to recover a Payment Protection Insurance premium paid in support of a loan. The borrower dealt directly with the lender, who acted as an intermediary with the insurer. The commission taken by the lender was 87%. Held: Tomlinson LJ described this level of commission as ‘quite startling’, adding that … Continue reading Harrison and Another v Black Horse Ltd: CA 12 Oct 2011
The claimants sought repayment by the bank of sums paid to them for Payment Protection Insurance policies sold to them in connection with loans made by the bank. The Bank now resisted an application for leave to amend the particulars of the counterclaim to allege that the taking out of the insurance had been made … Continue reading Barnes and Another v Black Horse Ltd: QBD 31 May 2011
The appellant challenged possession orders under mortgages, saying that the mortgage arrangement was unfair under section 140A of the 1974 Act. He said that the lender’s valuation had been excessive. Held: With the exception of his treatment of the procuration fee, the judge was entitled to conclude that there was no unfairness in the relationship … Continue reading Nelmes v Nram Plc: CA 26 May 2016
Appeal against award of sums remaining due under a mortgage after redemption. Tolson QC HHJ [2015] EW Misc B4 (CC) Bailii Consumer Credit Act 1974 140A England and Wales Contract, Consumer Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.545101
Whether the cause of action for the outstanding sums accrued when D first defaulted in his payments or only when D failed to comply with the default notice stipulated by CCA s.87(1) and required by clause 8f of the Agreement. D appealed from a finding against him. Held: The appeal failed. ‘The effect of the … Continue reading Doyle v PRA Group (UK) Ltd: CA 23 Jan 2019
OFT Claim: The borrowers, Yates and Lorenzelli, alleged (1) that there was an unfair relationship under section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act; (2) that the creditor procured a breach by the broker of the fiduciary duty owed by it to the borrowers by paying to the broker an undisclosed commission; and (3) that the … Continue reading Yates and Lorenzelli v Nemo Personal Finance and Another: 14 May 2010
Consumer Credit Act 1974, ss. 16B, 140A, 140B – Whether loan agreement regulated – Whether business exemption applies – Burden of proof – Effect of failures to give extended disclosure and serve witness evidence – Sufficiency of business purposes declaration – Omission of words ‘or predominantly’ after ‘wholly’ – Whether strict compliance with prescribed form … Continue reading Campbell v Tyrrell and Others: ChD 8 Mar 2022
The claimant sought repayment of a personal protection insurance premium paid to her broker. The broker was now in insolvent liquidation, and she sought to recover the premium from the next intermediary. Held: Any limitation of section 140A(1)(c) to acts or omissions for which the creditor was personally or vicariously responsible would imply that the … Continue reading Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd and Another: CA 16 Dec 2013
PPI Sale – No Recovery from Remote Parties The claimant sought repayment of payment protection insurance premiums paid by her under a policy with Norwich Union. The immediate broker arranging the loan was now insolvent, and she sought repayment from the second and other level intermediaties. She said that the commission disclosure by the defendants … Continue reading Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd: SC 12 Nov 2014
Manchester County Court – The claimant sought repayment of insurance premiums paid as payment protection insurance when aking out a loan with the defendants as advised by the second defendant. The second defendant was in liquidation by the time her claim was issued. In pursuing a claim for at the most andpound;5,000, her lawyers had … Continue reading Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd and Another: Misc 4 Oct 2012
