Click the case name for better results:

Sagal (T/A Bunz UK) v Atelier Bunz Gmbh: CA 3 Jul 2009

The court was asked whether the the appellant was a commercial agent of the defendant within the regulations, and so would be entitled to compensation on termination of the agency.Longmore LJ said: ‘It does not follow that every agent acting on behalf of the principal is necessarily a ‘commercial agent . . ‘ Judges: Longmore … Continue reading Sagal (T/A Bunz UK) v Atelier Bunz Gmbh: CA 3 Jul 2009

Light and Others v Ty Europe Ltd: CA 25 Jul 2003

The claimants sought damages under the regulations. They were self employed sales agents. At first they were sub agents but upon the ceasing to trade of the main agents they had acted directly for the principal. Those agencies had been terminated. Held: In addition to the question of whether they were agents within the directive, … Continue reading Light and Others v Ty Europe Ltd: CA 25 Jul 2003