ECJ Order – Civil service – Duty to provide assistance – Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment by a hierarchical superior – Production of a confidential document – Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure Citations: F-42/10, [2011] EUECJ F-42/10 Links: Bailii Cited by: Order – Skareby v Commission (Civil … Continue reading Skareby v Commission (Civil Service): ECJ 6 Apr 2011
In all three claims, children sought to recover the costs of applications to approve compromises of their claims for damages for personal injuries received. In particular the court was asked whether they were entitled only to fixed costs, or were subject to detailed assessment. Citations: [2012] EWCA Civ 184 Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules … Continue reading Dockerill and Another v Tullett: CA 24 Feb 2012
The claimant intended to seek recovery of a very substantial sum from the defendant. On learning of the defendant’s intention to sell its assets, it sought an order freezing them. Held: The court has the discretion to order a freezing of a defendant’s assets so as to prevent a transfer of those assets, even though … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Anchor Foods Ltd (No 2): ChD 24 Mar 1999
The court considered a contributory invalidity scheme: ‘today the general rule is that Article 6(1) does apply in the field of social insurance, including even welfare assistance . . State intervention is not sufficient to establish that Article 6(1) is inapplicable; other considerations argue in favour of the applicability of Article 6(1) in the instant … Continue reading Schuler-Zgraggen v Switzerland: ECHR 24 Jun 1993
Application for leave to appeal. Judges: Wall LJ Citations: [2009] EWCA Civ 754 Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 1998 52.3(6) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Children Updated: 30 July 2022; Ref: scu.361447
‘can a defendant plead a comprehensive defence to allegations of breach (which relies on matters not expressly addressed by the particulars of claim), and raise a separate case on causation (which it says would defeat the claimant’s claim in any event), and then seek to rely upon CPR 17.4(2) to deny the claimant the opportunity … Continue reading Mulalley and Co Ltd v Martlet Homes Ltd: CA 24 Jan 2022
The defendant had sought an order requiring the claimant to remove from a witness statement elements referring to without prejudice discussions between the parties before litigation began. Held: The defendant’s appeal succeeded. The test for proximity of the negotiations to the litigation was not one of time, but of the closeness of the connection between … Continue reading Framlington Group Ltd and Another v Barnetson: CA 24 May 2007
The claimant licensee alleged that the license contract had been repudiated by the defendant licensor. The claimant succeeded at the trial of liability. The defendant had made a payment into court. The judge was told of the payment but not of the amount. He ordered the defendant to pay the costs of the liability trial … Continue reading HSS Hire Services Group Plc v BMB Builders Merchants Ltd and Another: CA 24 May 2005
The appellant police officers and others were defendants in an action for defamation. They appealed a refusal of a trial of the preliminary issue as to whether they had the benefit of qualified privilege. They said that recent case law (GKR Karate and Loutchansky) had established a rule to that effect. Held: The cases did … Continue reading MacIntyre v Phillips and Others: CA 24 Jul 2001
It had been argued by the claimant in written submissions (although not maintained orally) that an order for payment of pre-judgment interest on costs should never be made. As to an award of interest on costs:- ‘In any event in principle there seems no reason why the Court should not do so where a party … Continue reading Bim Kemi Ab v Blackburn Chemicals Ltd: CA 24 Jun 2003
The case was listed to be heard on the Monday. On the Friday before it had been settled. The court complained of the lawyers that they had not informed the court, and that consequently much of the judge’s time over the weekend had been wasted in preparatrion. The parties must recognise that a judge would … Continue reading Tasyurdu v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 24 Mar 2003
The claimant appealed against a decision of the Court of Appeal quashing the judgement in his favour for damages for defamation. Held: The Court of Appeal was not able to quash a jury verdict as perverse, and the appeal succeeded. An appellate court could not substitute its own verdict on the facts for that of … Continue reading Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Another: HL 24 Oct 2002
A case had been originally dealt with under the fast track procedure, but after amendment, the amount at stake came to exceed andpound;15,000. Held: It was permissible for a judge to continue to deal with a matter under the procedure. Relevant factors are the amount by which the claim comes to exceed the limit, and … Continue reading Melissa Maguire v Ricardo David Molin: CA 24 Jul 2002
After a judgment the parties sought to appeal. Held: The judge had failed to make a finding on a critical issue in the case, namely whether or not the mother of the child concerned had ‘even if prompted only at a subconscious level, nevertheless deliberately engaged in alienation.’ Whilst some circumstances might require an application … Continue reading In re T (a Child) (Contact: Alienation: Permission to Appeal): CA 24 Oct 2002
The case asked how cases involving disputes as to the care of children, and of the treatment of adults claimed to be mentally incompetent. Where the issues were solely ones of public law, then they should be heard by way of judicial review in the QBD. Where any private law issues arose, they should be … Continue reading A (a Patient) v A Health Authority and Others; In re J (a Child); Regina (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another: CA 24 Jan 2002
New and future practice directions as to costs under the Civil Procedure Rules should be applied as appropriate to family proceedings and proceedings in the Family Division. The significant difference remained as to systems of funding, and it remains the case that enforceable conditional fee arrangements will not apply in family cases. Citations: Times 24-Oct-2000 … Continue reading Practice Direction (Family Proceedings Costs): FD 24 Oct 2000
The claimant having received a better settlement of his claim than had been offered by the defendant, he now sought an order under CPR and as to the level of interest payable. Judges: Pepperall QC DHCJ Citations: [2017] EWHC 3051 (QB), [2017] WLR(D) 784 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 1998 36.17(4) Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Mohammed v The Home Office: QBD 24 Nov 2017
The appellant, liquidator of two South African companies, had made a successful without notice application for an asset freezing order. He believed that the defendants had stripped the companies of substantial assets. The order was set aside for want of jurisdiction, because it had not been ancillary to any proceedings which had even been formulated … Continue reading Fourie v Le Roux and others: HL 24 Jan 2007
Appeal raising a point of considerable importance arising out of the interplay between the costs budgeting regime under Part 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the detailed costs assessment regime under Part 47 of the CPR. The Costs Judge when granting permission said this: ‘The issue is the subject of significant debate in the … Continue reading Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust: QBD 24 Feb 2017
Application by the Defendants for security for costs pursuant to CPR 25 Snowden J [2016] EWHC 2610 (Ch) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules England and Wales Costs Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570478
‘The power of the court to strike out a statement of case under CPR 3.4(2)(a) – and the related power to give summary judgment under CPR 24.2 – has an important place in the disposal of claims in accordance with the Civil Procedural Rules. The exercise of those powers, in an appropriate case, gives effect … Continue reading Independents’ Advantage Insurance Company Ltd v Cook and Another: CA 24 Jul 2003
The claimant was injured in a car accident in France. The defendant insurer said that the quantification of damages was to be according to French law and the calculation of interest also. The claimant said that English law applied. Held: The assessment of damages is a procedural matter, and is governed by the law of … Continue reading Knight v Axa Assurances: QBD 24 Jul 2009
The defendant sought leave to bring proceedings for contempt of court against the claimant saying that she had had no honest belief in the matters deposed in her statement of truth, in that she had substantially exaggerated her injuries. Held: Leave was granted. The court approached the application on the basis ‘that the discretion to … Continue reading Kirk v Walton: QBD 24 Jul 2008
Where a claim form is served in time but is incorrectly served (in this case on the defendants’ insurers instead of on the defendants themselves), there is no power in the court under CPR 3.10(b) (remedy of errors of procedure) or CPR 6.8 (service by an alternative method) retrospectively to remedy the error by deeming … Continue reading Elmes v Hygrade Food Products Plc: CA 24 Jan 2001
Unreasonable Behaviour must reach criteria W appealed against the judge’s refusal to grant a decree of divorce. He found that the marriage had broken down irretrievably, but did not find that H had behaved iin such a way that she could not reasonably be expected to live with H. Held: W’s appeal failed. ‘What the … Continue reading Owens v Owens: CA 24 Mar 2017
The court considered the meaning of ‘real’ prospects of success: ‘This does not mean that a party can successfully resist summary judgement by suggesting, like Mr Micawber, that something may turn up to save him, though he does not know what: see per Megarry V-C in Lady Anne Tennant v. Associated Newspapers Group Ltd [1979] … Continue reading Fraser and others v Oystertec Plc and others: 3 Nov 2009
The test to be applied to the question of summary disposal under s.8 of the 1996 Act is the same as that under CPR Part 24. Judges: Early J Citations: [2000] EMLR 681 Statutes: Defamation Act 1996 8, Civil Procedure Rules 24 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Downtex v Flatley CA 2-Oct-2003 … Continue reading James Gilbert Ltd v MGN Ltd: 2000
Judges: Mr Justice Beatson Citations: [2009] EWHC 1333 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 24.6 25.7 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 26 November 2022; Ref: scu.347024
Judgment on the Defendant’s Application for a ruling by way of CPR 24.2 that the Claimant had, in fact, instructed a firm of solicitors in respect of a proposed property transaction before his accident in 2015. Judges: Master Thornett Citations: [2022] EWHC 2850 (KB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 24.2 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Holdgate v Bishop: KBD 11 Nov 2022
The defendant appealed a summary judgement on the claimant’s claim with respect to her alleged disclosure of details Miss Campbell’s private life. The claimant sought an action for account of profits for breach of the terms of a contract of service. The defendant claimed that a violent assault by the claimant on her was a … Continue reading Campbell v Frisbee: ChD 14 Mar 2002
The claimant alleged that the proposal for a game show submitted by him had been used by the various defendants. He alleged breaches of copyright and of confidence. Application was now made to strike out the claim. Judges: Arnold J Citations: [2010] EWHC 2065 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 24.2 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Meakin v British Broadcasting Corporation and Others: ChD 27 Jul 2010
Each party sought summary judgment in the case Judges: Roth J Citations: [2010] EWHC 1083 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 24 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Lewis v Client Connection Ltd ChD 6-Jul-2011 The claimant alleged infringement of his registered trade marks ‘Money Saving Expert’ and associated terms. The defendant … Continue reading Vaseeharan and Another v Uthayaranjan: ChD 21 May 2010
Appeals were made against interlocutory injunctions for alleged trade mark infringement. Held: The court should hesitate about making a final decision for summary judgment without a trial, even where there is no obvious conflict of fact at the time of the application, where reasonable grounds exist for believing that a fuller investigation into the facts … Continue reading Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd and Others v The Bolton Pharmaceutical Company 100 Ltd: CA 26 May 2006
The claimant sought specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The purchase was under an option agreement. The option was exercisable on the grant of planning permission within a certain period, extensible in the case of an appeal. Held: The contract did not impose much by way of obligation on the buyer … Continue reading Chantry Estates (South East) Ltd v Anderson and Another: ChD 3 Oct 2008
Appeal from a decision of Morland J, who granted the defendants summary judgment under Civil Procedure Rule 24(2)(a)(2), finding that the claimant, Mr Spencer, had no real prospect of succeeding on his claim. Held: Buxton LJ said: ‘Bearing in mind the emphasis placed on the right to jury trial in section 69 [of the Senior … Continue reading Spencer v Sillitoe and Another: CA 22 Oct 2002
The claimants sought damages for defamation and breach of contract. The claimants had purchased a business from the defendant, which contract included a clause requiring the defendant to say nothing damaging about the business. The defendant asserted qualified privilege. The defendant was alleged to have told suppliers, by means of anonymous letters, that they were … Continue reading Downtex v Flatley: CA 2 Oct 2003
The publication of articles in a newspaper describing how a ‘black clerk’ had complained about the allegedly racist comments of two policemen was said to have caused the claimant to receive racist hate mail. Held: The court considered the type of conduct which had to be proved to bring the case within the statute. Publication … Continue reading Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd: CA 18 Jul 2001
In appropriate cases it was proper for a court summarily to dispose of cases. If a party has no reasonable prospect of success, it is in accordance with the philosophy of the new rules to manage cases actively and to allot court time to cases with the need to deal justly with claims. In this … Continue reading James v Evans: CA 2 Aug 2000
Strike out – Realistic Not Fanciful Chance Needed The proper test for whether an action should be struck out under the new Rules was whether it had a realistic as opposed to a fanciful prospect of success. There was no justification for further attempts to explain the meaning of what are clear words. The judge … Continue reading Swain v Hillman: CA 21 Oct 1999
Principles Applicable on Summary Judgment Request The court considered an application for summary judgment. Held: Lewison J set out the principles: ‘the court must be careful before giving summary judgment on a claim. The correct approach on applications by defendants is, in my judgment, as follows: i) The court must consider whether the claimant has … Continue reading Easyair Ltd (T/A Openair) v Opal Telecom Ltd: ChD 2 Mar 2009
By acting together, two shareholders had first refused the proposed dividend, and replaced the board. They then acquired fiurther shares and achieved a majority of more than 75%, sufficient to pass a special resolution, and proposed the cancellation of the company’s listing on the German Stock exchange, affecting the value of the remaining minority shares. … Continue reading Eckerle and Others v Wickeder Westfalenstahl Gmbh and Another: ChD 23 Jan 2013
The claimants said that agents of the defendant had unlawfully accessed their mobile phone systems. The court was now asked whether the agent (M) could rely on the privilege against self incrimination, and otherwise as to the progress of the case. The claimant asserted that their claim was an intellectual property claim, allowing section 72 … Continue reading Gray v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Another; Coogan v Same: ChD 25 Feb 2011
The claimant alleged infringement of his registered trade marks ‘Money Saving Expert’ and associated terms. The defendant operated a service trading as ‘Money Claiming Expert’. Both services included advising those who might wish to claim refunds from banks. The claimant sought summary judgment. Held: The defence as filed proposed no real defence,merely putting the claimant … Continue reading Lewis v Client Connection Ltd: ChD 6 Jul 2011
The claimant sought repayment of loans. The judge had refused summary judgement, but ordered the defendant to pay a sum into court, failing which his defence would be struck out. The defendant appealed saying the condition for making a conditional . .
The claimants appealed against summary judgment striking out their claim against the first defendant firm of solicitors, on the basis that they had no real prospect of establishing that another defendant was or had held himself out to be a partner . .
. .
In each of three cases, the former defendants sought leave to bring claims for contempt of court in respect of what it said were fraudulent claims by the respondents. The defendants argued that a party had first to go to the Attorney General. Held: ‘Notwithstanding the language of Rules 32.14 and 31.23 and, in particular, … Continue reading Barnes (T/A Pool Motors) v Seabrook and Others: Admn 23 Jul 2010
(High Court of Australia) The court considered the law on the effect of mental incapacity on a contract in the two cases Imperial Loan, and Molton v Camroux: ‘The principle of the decision seems, however, to be the same in both cases, which, in our judgment, establish that a contract made by a person actually … Continue reading McLaughlin v Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co. Ltd: 15 Jul 1904
Dr M had successfully challenged her dismissal and recovered damages for unfair dismissal and race discrimination. In the interim, Her employer HA had reported the dismissal to the respondent who continued their proceedings despite the decision in her favour. The GMC now said that the availability of judicial review excluded her right to commence proceedings … Continue reading Michalak v General Medical Council and Others: SC 1 Nov 2017
The claimant challenged a production order made by the magistrates in respect of journalists’ material. They complained that the application had used secret evidence not disclosed to it, and that the judge had not given adequate reasons to support the decision. The poice were investigating an offence under the 1989 Act. Held: It was common … Continue reading British Sky Broadcasting Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The Central Criminal Court and Another: Admn 21 Dec 2011
Important point as to the strength of the case on the merits to be established in order to obtain leave to serve out of the jurisdiction and its relationship to the strength of the claim to be established to avoid being struck out under CPR 3.4 or 24.2. Judges: Mr Justice Colman Citations: [2001] EWHC … Continue reading De Molestina and Others v Ponton and Others: ComC 16 May 2001
Two barristers had been struck off for disciplinary offences. Their appeals were heard by three High Court judges sitting as Visitors, who dismissed the appeals. The barristers now sought judicial review of that decision. Held: Justices sitting as visitors were not sitting as judges as such, but in a domestic forum, and their decisions were … Continue reading Regina v Visitors to the Inns of Court ex parte Calder: CA 1993
The defendant’s witness statement referred to a letter written to him by the defendant’s solicitor. The claimant appealed refusal of an order for its disclosure. Held: The appeal failed. The letter was protected by legal professional privilege, and its mention in a statement did not automatically amount to waiver of that privilege. The rules referred … Continue reading Expandable Ltd and Another v Rubin: CA 11 Feb 2008
The court gave guidance on the practice and procedure on second appeals. Citations: [2000] All ER 1 Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 52.2(3) 52.4.8 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Markos v Goodfellow and Barke and Barke CA 26-Jul-2001 There was a boundary dispute. The judge in the County Court had made an error. … Continue reading Clark v Perkes: 2000
The court heard an appeal against a Master’s order which had given the defendant permission under rule 36.6(5) to withdraw a Part 36 payment. Held: The same considerations apply to giving permission to withdraw money in court as to refusing permission to take it out. He inclined, following Marsh v. Frenchay Healthcare, to a more … Continue reading MRW Technologies v Cecil Holdings: 22 Jun 2001
The claimant had rejected satellite antennae it had bought from the defendants, and sought damages. The defendant said the English court did not have jurisdiction, since the order terms contained an exclusive jurisdiction clause. The claimant sought to appeal the oder refusing jurisdiction. The county court judge had refused permission to appeal to the High … Continue reading 7E Communications Ltd v Vertex Antennentechnik Gmbh: CA 25 Feb 2007
The claimant had delivered his claim form to the court, but it was not processed until after the limitation period had expired. The defendant appealed a finding that the claimant had brought the cliam within the necessary time. Held: The claim was brought within the necessary time limit. ‘the courts have given claimants the full … Continue reading St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Barnes: CA 25 Oct 2006
Judges: Mr Justice Aikens Citations: [2007] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 693, [2007] BusLR D69, [2007] ArbLR 19 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68(2)(g) 80(5), Civil Procedure Rules 62.9(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 22 November 2022; Ref: scu.248268
Judges: Lord Justice Auld, Lord Justice Waller And Lord Justice Mantell Citations: [2003] EWCA Civ 782 Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 36 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – KR and others v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd and Another CA 12-Feb-2003 The respondent appealed decisions by the court to allow claims for … Continue reading DK, KR, CGE, DHM, PS, RM, DJ, GOM v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd (In Liquidation) and Royal and Sun Alliance PLC: CA 22 May 2003
Defendant’s application for summary judgment pursuant to CPR 24.2 and/or strike out of the claim pursuant to CPR 3.4(a) on the basis that there are no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and /or (b) that it is an abuse of process. The claim is pleaded as one for restitution /damages in the sum of … Continue reading Ogedegbe v Simplyhealth People Ltd: KBD 17 Nov 2022
ECHR Article 6Civil proceedingsArticle 6-1Impartial tribunalIndependent tribunalStructural defects of the system of judicial discipline: violationFair hearingAbsence of limitation period for imposing disciplinary penalty on judges and abuse of electronic vote system in Parliament when adopting decision on judge’s dismissal: violationsTribunal established by lawComposition of chamber examining applicant’s case defined by a judge whose term of … Continue reading Oleksandr Volkov v Ukraine: ECHR 9 Jan 2013
The claimant sought to enforce a judgment debt against a foreign resident company, and for this purpose to examine or have examined a director who lived abroad. The defendant said that the rules gave no such power and they did, the power was outside the rule-maker’s power. Held: Even though the rule-making power is wide … Continue reading Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Co Sal and Others: HL 30 Jul 2009
The applicants sought to strike out a claim under section 459. The two companies sold toiletries, the one as retail agent for the other. They disputed the relationship of the companies, and the use of a trading name. Documents were disclosed which appeared to be fabrications. Held: Where a party was in breach of court … Continue reading Arrow Nominees Inc, Blackledge v Blackledge: ChD 2 Nov 1999
The parties experts had met and agreed evidence, but the claimant’s expert later changed his mind. She now appealed being refused permission to bring additional evidence. Held: The meeting of experts was to encourage them to seek agreement. The fact that an expert had changed his mind would not alone be sufficient to call additional … Continue reading Stallwood v David and Another: QBD 25 Oct 2006
A part 36 offer can be withdrawn at any time before it is accepted or expires. The rules can not force an offer to be left open. Clear words would have been required within the rules to impose such an obligation. The actual words referred to offers ‘expressed’ to be open for 21 days, but … Continue reading Scammell and Others v Dicker: CA 21 Dec 2000
The court considered the institution of proceedings for contempt of court based upon an allegation that a document filed in court proceedings and supported by a statement of truth was false. In this case the defendant argued that the first claimant had grossly exaggerated his injuries. The second claimant had come to admit the falsity … Continue reading Nield and Another v Loveday and Another: Admn 13 Jul 2011
A quia timet action in a defamation case must specify the precise words which are expected to be used. Citations: Times 28-Feb-1996, [1996] 3 All ER 707 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Affirmed – Best v Charter Medical of England Ltd and Another CA 26-Oct-2001 The Civil Procedure Rules did not alter the previous … Continue reading British Data Management Plc v Boxer Commercial Removals Plc and Another: CA 28 Feb 1996
The claimant sought damages in defamation, saying that a combination of publications identified him. Held: Eady J briefly discussed the effect of hyperlinks in the context of a dispute about meaning or reference in a defamation case. Judges: Eady J Citations: [2010] EWHC 100 (QB) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Swain … Continue reading Ali v Associated Newspapers Ltd: QBD 27 Jan 2010
The claimant sought damages after publication by the first defendant of articles which it was claimed implied that he had taken drugs. The paper claimed qualified privilege, and claimed Reynolds immunity. Held: The defence of qualified privilege should be restored, and be decided at trial, and not summarily. Judges: Brooke LJ, Tuckey LJ, Arden LJ … Continue reading Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd and David Walsh, Alan English: CA 29 Jul 2005
The comptroller no longer has jurisdiction to extend the period for filing an appellants notice at the High Court – see Patent Office Practice Notice 1/2003 at [2003] RPC 46. However, the hearing officer held that, owing to an anomaly in the Civil Procedure Rules, he did have jurisdiction to direct the period within which … Continue reading Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Group Services (Patent): IPO 11 Jan 2005
The claimant estate agents appealed dismissal of their claim for commission. The owners were splitting up, and there was to begin with no clear instruction to market the property. Later the property was sold privately, but to a buyer introduced by the claimant to Mrs Voyce. The agent asked the court to go beyond its … Continue reading Day Morris Associates v Voyce and Another: CA 26 Feb 2003
The claimant had begun its action complaining of infringement of unregistered design right in the High Court. The defendant applied to have the case heard in the Patents County Court. Held: The current practice, under which such a decision was made by the transferring court was the correct one, and was within the Civil Procedure … Continue reading DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd: ChD 3 Apr 2012
The defendants appealed against an order for pre-action disclosure. Judges: Tuckey LJ, Jacob LJ, Moore-Bick LJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Civ 50 Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 31.16 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 22 October 2022; Ref: scu.248323
Football organisations applied to be joined to a case being remitted to the European Court for the purpose of giving their views on the questions raised. The European Court practice only allowed for states to act as interveners. The court had already recognised the significance of the question to be referred as to the licensing … Continue reading Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure (A Trading Name) and Others: ChD 13 Nov 2008
The jockey claimant challenged disciplinary proceedings brought against him by the defendant authority. Held: The findings were upheld in part but remitted for consideration of giving the claimant opportunity to challenge certain evidence. Citations: [2010] EWHC 508 (QB) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Nagle v Fielden CA 1966 The applicant, a … Continue reading McKeown v British Horseracing Authority: QBD 12 Mar 2010
The claimants sought unpaid royalties. The defendants sought to have the claim struck out as an abuse of process. Held: Such interlocutory applications alleging abuse of process should now be dealt with on the same footing as other applications for summary relief. The court had to be able to say with a high degree of … Continue reading Barrett v Universal-Island Records Ltd and Another: ChD 28 Mar 2003
The respondent declined to produce information held about the claimant saying that it was not held within a filing system so as to bring it within the Act. Held: ‘the legislature has taken a policy decision not to bring unstructured files within the general scope of the Directive. ‘ Judges: Laddie, The Hon Mr Justice … Continue reading Smith v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc: ChD 23 Feb 2005
Judges: Gloster J DBE Citations: [2007] EWHC 3010 (Comm), [2008] ILPr 14, [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 305 Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 71.2 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd ComC 17-May-2005 . . See Also – Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd CA … Continue reading Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company Sal and Another: ComC 20 Dec 2007
In the course of the hearing some of the claimant’s allegations were dropped. Newspapers having taken an interest in the case sought disclosure of the full document. Held: The parts of the statements not relied upon included allegations against third parties who would have no opportunity of reply, and which allegations were not pursued. The … Continue reading Cox v Jones: ChD 6 May 2004
Pre-action disclosure. The test of a properly arguable case with a real prospect of success is the same test as is set out in CPR 13.3(1) and 24.2 in relation to setting aside judgments in default and resisting summary judgment respectively. The Court of Appeal in Rose had not been concerned with whether a lower … Continue reading BSW Ltd v Balltec Ltd: ChD 11 Apr 2006
Applications for trade marks on behalf of the claimant had been rejected. Acquired distinctiveness was a significant issue, and the question of whether the appeal was a review or a rehearing was significant. In this appeal, the parties had given oral evidence, and the Registrar contended that any further appeal to the High court should … Continue reading Dyson Limited v The Registrar of Trade Marks: ChD 15 May 2003
The court considered issues relating to the appropriateness of the claimants instructing London solicitors in a case in which those solicitors had submitted a bill of costs totalling pounds 220,000 in connection with a claim in which their clients had recovered pounds 90,000. Sir Christopher Staughton said: ‘So surely case management powers will allow a … Continue reading Solutia UK Limited v Griffiths: CA 26 Apr 2001
The claimant challenged an order requiring him to give security for costs before proceeding. The judge had felt he was unreasonable in the way he was pursuing his claim. He appealed saying the order was made outside the scope of Part 25. Held: The rules now allowed orders akin to orders for security for costs … Continue reading Olakunle O Olatawura v Alexander O Abiloye: CA 17 Jul 2002
The applicant had been sentenced to nine months imprisonment for having broken his undertaking to the Court. He appealed against that sentence. The other party also sought to appeal other parts of the order. Held: An appeal limited to the sentencing part of a committal for contempt did not require leave to appeal, being as … Continue reading London Borough of Barnet v Hurst: CA 17 Jul 2002
The claimant had appealed a judgment against her. The court itself recommended that the parties use a method of alternate dispute resolution, to avoid the need for appeal. The defendant refused, not wishing to make any payment over and above the offer it had already made. Held: The defendant, otherwise successful on appeal, should be … Continue reading Dunnett v Railtrack plc: CA 22 Feb 2002
Common issues relating to the construction of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules and its inter-action with Part 44, which contains general rules about costs, and Section II of Part 45, which contains rules about costs in certain kinds of road traffic accident claims. Judges: Pill, Moore-Bick, Aikens LJJ, Hurst SCJ Citations: [2011] EWCA … Continue reading Solomon v Cromwell Group Plc: CA 19 Dec 2011
A party had been refused leave to appeal against an arbitration under the Act by the judge, but later obtained leave to appeal. Held: Such leave could only be granted by the trial judge, and the Court of Appeal could set aside the leave granted in excess of jurisdiction. The parties had argued that the … Continue reading Athletic Union of Constantinople v National Basketball Association and Others: CA 28 May 2002
Judgment in default had been entered against the defendant after the court had in its own discretion corrected an error in service of the claim form. The form had been served personally in Reykjavik, but that form of service was not allowed in Iceland. Held: The appeal was allowed. Rule 3.10 could not be used … Continue reading Olafsson v Gissurarson: QBD 8 Dec 2006
At first instance the appellant had dishonestly assisted another party to defraud the respondent, and ordered payment of substantial damages. The defendant, non-resident, sought to appeal, and the respondent asked the court to order payment into court of the amount of the award, saying that the appellant did not otherwise have the assets within the … Continue reading Goldtrail Travel Ltd v Onur Air Tasimacilik As: SC 2 Aug 2017
Further applications in defendant’s application for summary judgment and or security for costs in the claimant’s claim alleging copyright infringement. Held: The claimant was ordered to pay a sum of andpound;50,000 as security for costs.Kitchin J summarised the principles: ‘(i) the court has jurisdiction under rule 24.6 to make an order which is tantamount to … Continue reading Allen v Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another: ChD 18 Mar 2011
E Was born with and still suffered severe learning difficulties. The court was asked as to the extent of his capacity to make decisions, and as to where he should live, with a family member, the carer or with the local authority, which had removed him from her care. As he had become an adult, … Continue reading G v E and Others: CoP 26 Mar 2010
The mortgagor sought to appeal against a mortgagee’s possession order. The Court of Appeal considered the interaction between an application under CPR rule 39.3 to set aside a default judgment and an application for permission to appeal under CPR Pt 52. Held: The dismissal of an application under CPR Rule 39.3 does not, of itself, … Continue reading Bank of Scotland v Pereira and Others: CA 9 Mar 2011
The claimant suffered severe brain injury in a crash. The parties sought guidance form the court as to his legal capacity. Held: The fact that a party may be particularly susceptible to exploitation was a relevant element when considering his capacity to act, though alone it would not usually be enough to find a lack … Continue reading Lindsay v Wood: QBD 16 Nov 2006
The claimant appealed against an order striking out his claim and a consequential civil proceedings order had been made. Held: ‘ the statement of case in this action disclose no reasonable grounds for bringing any of these claims. Accordingly it must be struck out in its entirety. ‘ Judges: Tugendhat Citations: [2005] EWHC 550 (QB) … Continue reading Branch and others v Department for Constitutional Affairs: QBD 8 Apr 2005
The applicant had failed to comply with an unless order, delivering his expert evidence some 20 minutes late. The evidence had not been allowed. They appealed. Held: The claim was re-instated. This was not the first occasion of default. Nevertheless, the rules listed several matters to be considered, and the judge must apply his mind … Continue reading R C Residuals Ltd (formerly Regent Chemicals Ltd) v Linton Fuel Oils Ltd: CA 2 May 2002
Application for relief from sanctions made pursuant to CPR 3.9(1) Judges: Henry Carr QC Citations: [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 3.9(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 24 August 2022; Ref: scu.526609
The court was asked, on a reference back from the Supreme Court: ‘to determine whether the court should require [the interested party] to provide a copy of any other document placed before the judge and referred to in the course of the trial to [the applicant] . . in accordance with the principles laid down … Continue reading Dring v Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd: QBD 16 Jul 2020
Trial of a claim issued under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules in which the Claimant seeks sums alleged to be due under a contract of indemnity or damages for breach of that contract along with declarations as to its entitlement. Judges: Philip Marshall QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) … Continue reading Euler Hermes Sa v Mackays Stores Group Ltd: ComC 25 Jul 2022
The defendants appealed an award of costs on an indemnity basis against them in the favour of a legally aided claimant. Held: Indemnity costs were often intended to indicate disapproval of a party’s behaviour in an action, and were awarded in several and discretionary circumstances. It was not an objection of principle to say that … Continue reading Brawley v Marczynski and Another: CA 21 Oct 2002
The parties had been involved in protracted litigation where a freezing order had been made to support a claim which was eventually dismissed. The claimant sought to have set aside an earlier order made ordering him to pay costs on failing to have the order discharged. Held: The order had been made under the former … Continue reading Deg-Deutsche Investitions – Undentwicklungs Gesellschaft Gmbh v Thomas Koshy: ChD 13 Dec 2004