the non-resident parent’s gross income from and including the effective date of 8 November 2015 is to be calculated without regard to regulation 36(2)(b) of the Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012. Citations: [2018] UKUT 157 (AAC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Child Support Updated: 22 April 2022; Ref: scu.616363
Child support – 2012 scheme – Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012 regulation 70 (variation where non-resident parent on flat rate with gross weekly income) and regulation 73 – drawdowns from non-resident parent’s pension pot to pay legal fees and to meet ancillary relief order – just and equitable requirement – Child Support Act 1991 … Continue reading RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and PR (CSM): UTAA 10 Jan 2022
The House considered whether under the 1992 Regulations a self-employed parent could use for his child support calculation his net earnings as declared to the Revenue, which would allow deduction of capital and other allowances properly claimed against tax. Held: The appeal was allowed, and the decision of the Child Support Commissioner restored (majority). The … Continue reading Smith v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Another: HL 12 Jul 2006
Child support – Variation: other – Non – resident parent with unearned income – Child Support Maintenance Calculations Regulations 2012, reg.69 – Interpretation of reg.69(6). Child support – Variation: diversion of income – Child Support Maintenance Calculations Regulations 2012, reg.71 – Circumstances in which omitting to draw income from a company raises the issue of … Continue reading MQB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and SRB (CSM): UTAA 19 Oct 2021
The section in the 1985 Act created a power to prevent rent increases for tenancies of dwelling-houses for purposes including the alleviation of perceived hardship. Accordingly the Secretary of State could issue regulations whose effect was to limit the maximum amount of rent in the proper exercise of that discretionary power. The Act as a … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions and another, ex parte Spath Holme Limited: HL 7 Dec 2000