Search Results for: Arbitration Act 1996 7 9

Click the case name for better results:

Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001

When asking whether the time for appeal against an arbitrator’s award should be extended, the court should look at several circumstances, including the length of the delay; whether the party was acting reasonably in all the circumstances in delaying; whether the other party had contributed to the delay; whether other party would suffer irremediable prejudice … Continue reading Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001

Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd Of Nigeria: ComC 31 Jul 2009

Judges: Teare J Citations: [2009] EWHC 1975 (Comm), [2010] 1 Lloyds Rep 183, [2009] 2 CLC 446 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 70 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd of Nigeria ComC 7-Oct-2010 The courts do not approach arbitration … Continue reading Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd Of Nigeria: ComC 31 Jul 2009

West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxembourg) v Cristal Ltd (The Glacier Bay): CA 26 Oct 1995

An agreement giving to a ‘sole judge’ the power to make a final decision was effective, and there was no appeal from his decision. The defendant’s decision in his capacity as Convention administrator was as a final arbiter and was unreviewable. Held: The appeal was allowed. The agreement was unusual, but the decisions was final … Continue reading West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxembourg) v Cristal Ltd (The Glacier Bay): CA 26 Oct 1995

ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: Admn 20 Apr 2007

Application to remove arbitrators. Judges: Andrew Smith J Citations: [2007] EWHC 927 (Admin) Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 96 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England CA 16-Oct-2006 The court at first instance had dismissed the ship-owner’s application to set aside the arbitration award, and … Continue reading ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: Admn 20 Apr 2007

International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v President of India and Another: CA 11 Dec 1995

Actions to enforce arbitration awards were brought, each in the name of a ship-owning company. At the time of the arbitrations the assets of each company had vested in a trustee in bankruptcy appointed under New York law, but the trustee had persuaded the arbitrators that the companies were the proper claimants and had commenced … Continue reading International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v President of India and Another: CA 11 Dec 1995

Cameroon Airlines v Transnet Ltd: ComC 29 Jul 2004

Where it is claimed that the arbitral tribunal adopted improper procedures to determine an issue, the court should decline to try the issue in order to establish whether substantial injustice has in fact been caused. Judges: Langley J Citations: [2004] EWHC 1829 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Cameroon Airlines v Transnet Ltd: ComC 29 Jul 2004

Slot v East Hants District Council: CA 17 Nov 1998

The claimants appealed the district judge’s decision to rescind the reference to arbitration. Held: A point of law had arisen, and the decision made was one the judge could make of his own volition, and therefore no notice had been required. Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 1778 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Regina v … Continue reading Slot v East Hants District Council: CA 17 Nov 1998

Inco Europe Ltd and Others v First Choice Distribution (A Firm) and Others: CA 10 Sep 1998

The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a judge’s grant or refusal of an order staying court proceedings where arbitration was sought by one party under an agreement. Judges: Hobhouse LJ Citations: Times 22-Oct-1998, Gazette 28-Oct-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 1460, [1999] 1 WLR 270, [1999] CLC 165 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration … Continue reading Inco Europe Ltd and Others v First Choice Distribution (A Firm) and Others: CA 10 Sep 1998

Fakes v Taylor Woodrow Construction Limited: 1973

The plaintiff resisted an application for a stay of his action for an arbitration on the basis that his lack of funds would make it impossible to take part in an arbitration. Citations: [1973] QB 436 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Trustee of Property of Andrews v Brock Buildings (Kessingland) Limited CA … Continue reading Fakes v Taylor Woodrow Construction Limited: 1973

EL Nasharty v J Sainsbury Plc: ComC 13 Nov 2007

Judges: The Hon Mr Justice Tomlinson Citations: [2007] EWHC 2618 (Comm), [2007] ArbLR 18, [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 360 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Nasharty and others v J Sainsbury Plc ComC 30-Sep-2003 Application for stay of proceedings for arbitration. . . Lists of cited … Continue reading EL Nasharty v J Sainsbury Plc: ComC 13 Nov 2007

Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Another: CA 17 Oct 2014

Admissibility in forthcoming trial of correspondence said to be without prejudice: ‘That relates to the without prejudice negotiations that led to the settlement of the arbitration between Webinvest and the third party. The judge held that Mr Shlosberg had waived any privilege relating to those negotiations. I disagree. All he said in his evidence was … Continue reading Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Another: CA 17 Oct 2014

Elektrim SA v Vivendi Universal SA and others: ComC 19 Jan 2007

Judges: Mr Justice Aikens Citations: [2007] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 693, [2007] BusLR D69, [2007] ArbLR 19 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68(2)(g) 80(5), Civil Procedure Rules 62.9(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 22 November 2022; Ref: scu.248268

Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd v Holystone Overseas Ltd: ComC 11 Oct 2007

Application on the part of the Defendants, Holystone Overseas Ltd to vary an order for a freezing injunction obtained by the claimant Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd pursuant to section 44 (3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 Judges: Christopher Clarke J Citations: [2007] EWHC 2319 (Comm), [2007] ArbLR 46 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 44(3) … Continue reading Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd v Holystone Overseas Ltd: ComC 11 Oct 2007

Malekout v Medical Sickness Annuity and Life Assurance Society Limited: CA 21 May 1998

The plaintiff sought to appeal against a stay of his action so that it could be referred to arbitration. His claim was under insurance policies containing clauses providing for arbitration of disputes. Held: The judge had failed to take account of the fact that the claimant was receiving income support as an indication of his … Continue reading Malekout v Medical Sickness Annuity and Life Assurance Society Limited: CA 21 May 1998

Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Salem: HL 3 Mar 1999

The House of Lords has the power to hear a case where the parties have in effect settled and there remains no lis at issue, but the House will not hear such an academic case where no general issue of importance is at stake, or the facts are particular. There must be a good reason … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Salem: HL 3 Mar 1999

Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils Limited: CA 19 Dec 1997

The court was aked whether there was a dispute sufficient to sustain a stay of court proceedings for arbitration under the Act. Held: There was a dispute once money is claimed unless and until the defendants admit that the sum is due and payable. In arbitration proceedings a party is entitled to stay other proceedings … Continue reading Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils Limited: CA 19 Dec 1997

Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd: QBD 29 Dec 2004

Choses in action including contractual rights are ‘assets’ within the meaning of section 44(3). Citations: [2004] EWHC 3175 (QB), [2005] 2 Lloyds Rep 494 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 44(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd CA 24-May-2005 The parties were engaged in arbitration proceedings. … Continue reading Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd: QBD 29 Dec 2004

Davies Middleton and Davies Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corporation: CA 29 Aug 1997

Parties to a dispute agreed a way of resolving issues before arbitration. One party then sought to say that the agreement was void for uncertainty, being an agreement to agree. Held: The agreement merely set a mechansim for resolving the dispute and was valid. Citations: [1997] EWCA Civ 2318 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Davies Middleton and Davies Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corporation: CA 29 Aug 1997

PC Harrington Contractors Ltd v Systech International Ltd: CA 23 Oct 2012

The court considered the recoverability of the fees an arbitrator appointed under the 1996 Act, were the award had been determined unenforceable for a breach of the rules of natural justice. Held: The appeal against an order for payment of he fees succeeded. The arbitrator had not fulfilled the contract for which he had been … Continue reading PC Harrington Contractors Ltd v Systech International Ltd: CA 23 Oct 2012

Trustee of Property of Andrews v Brock Buildings (Kessingland) Limited: CA 21 Nov 1996

An impecunious plaintiff who resisted an application to stay proceedings in order to allow an arbitration can be required to show the cause of his inability to fund the action. Judges: Master of the Rolls, Aldous and Brooke LJJ Citations: Gazette 05-Feb-1997, Times 09-Dec-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 1023, [1997] QB 674 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration … Continue reading Trustee of Property of Andrews v Brock Buildings (Kessingland) Limited: CA 21 Nov 1996

Regina v District Auditor, Gateshead ex parte Judge P: CA 8 Nov 1996

The objector sought leave to appeal. He had objected to spending on a war memorial. The district auditor when declining to intervene had given his reasons. The claimant objected that he should have waited before giving those reasons. Held: Either the reasons were validly delivered in which case the objection failed, or they were not … Continue reading Regina v District Auditor, Gateshead ex parte Judge P: CA 8 Nov 1996

Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves and Company Ltd and others: ComC 7 Nov 2003

One party sought a declaration that arbitrators should have no jurisdiction to determine claims for commission said to be due to the Respondent chartering brokers. Held: Because he has in effect become a statutory assignee of the promisee’s right of action against the promisor and because, by reason of the underlying policy of section 1(4), … Continue reading Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves and Company Ltd and others: ComC 7 Nov 2003

Lowsley and Another v Forbes: CA 21 Mar 1996

The statutory time limit under the Limitation Act applied only to the right to take substantive proceedings and had nothing whatever to do with the procedural machinery for enforcing a judgment when one was obtained. The Act of 1875 brought about a fundamental change. The old absolute time bar on execution after 20 years, subsequently … Continue reading Lowsley and Another v Forbes: CA 21 Mar 1996

Desert Sun Loan Corporation v Hill: CA 21 Feb 1996

A defence of Issue Estoppel was not available where the issue which was claimed to have been decided had been made under an unclear foreign procedure. It was also essential that the issue in respect of which an estoppel was now asserted had been a finding necessary to the judgment to be relied upon: ‘The … Continue reading Desert Sun Loan Corporation v Hill: CA 21 Feb 1996

Guidance Investments Ltd v Guidance Hotel Investment Company Bsc: ComC 7 Nov 2013

Application by the Claimant for a stay of part of the Defendant’s Counterclaim under section 9 of the 1996 Act and/or pursuant to the court’s inherent jurisdiction on the grounds that it relates to matters covered by an arbitration clause. In addition the Claimant seeks an order that the Defendant be debarred from relying on … Continue reading Guidance Investments Ltd v Guidance Hotel Investment Company Bsc: ComC 7 Nov 2013

Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd and Others: EAT 16 Dec 2019

Practice and Procedure – Postponement or Stay – Transfer/Hearing Together An employment judge had erred in law in deciding that he lacked jurisdiction to determine a claim under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) arising between the claimant and the insurer of the insolvent first respondent. The employment tribunal was … Continue reading Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd and Others: EAT 16 Dec 2019

The Republic of Korea v Dayyani and Others: ComC 20 Dec 2019

Application by the Claimant, Republic, to set aside an award made by Professor Bernard Hanotiau (President), Mr Philippe Pinsolle and Dr Gavan Griffith QC pursuant to s. 67 Arbitration Act 1996, on the grounds that the Tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction over the claims made by the Defendants in the arbitration. Judges: Butcher J Citations: [2019] … Continue reading The Republic of Korea v Dayyani and Others: ComC 20 Dec 2019

Bilta (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Nazir and Others: ChD 17 May 2010

The sixth defendant resisted a claim against it saying that matters between them were governed by a framework agreement which provided for matters to be resolved by arbitration. The claimant resisted, denying the arbitration agreement and saying that the defendant was out of time to make such a claim. Held: Two arguments were directed to … Continue reading Bilta (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Nazir and Others: ChD 17 May 2010

Minister of Finance (Incorporated) v 1Malaysia Development Berhad and Others: CA 26 Nov 2019

The court considered an issue as to the primacy of the powers of the court contained in sections 67 and 68 (‘sections 67 and 68’) of the Arbitration Act 1996. Judges: Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Cour Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 2080 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration … Continue reading Minister of Finance (Incorporated) v 1Malaysia Development Berhad and Others: CA 26 Nov 2019

Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence: CA 29 Mar 2006

The applicant had dual Iraqi and British nationality. He was detained by British Forces in Iraq under suspicion of terrorism, and interned. Held: His appeal failed. The UN resolution took priority over the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a conflict between them. ‘If the Security Council, acting under Chapter VII, consider that … Continue reading Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence: CA 29 Mar 2006

O’Donoghue v Enterprise Inns Plc: ChD 29 Sep 2008

The tenant sought to appeal against an arbitration award as to his rent. He said that the arbitrator should have allowed him an oral hearing. Held: The claim failed: ‘the fact that the Arbitrator might have come to a different conclusion if there had been an oral hearing does not begin to establish that the … Continue reading O’Donoghue v Enterprise Inns Plc: ChD 29 Sep 2008

Brown v Rice and Another: ChD 14 Mar 2007

The parties, the bankrupt and her trustee, had engaged in a mediation which failed at first, but applicant said an agreement was concluded on the day following. The defendants denied this, and the court as asked to determine whether a settlement had occurred, and was now asked whether without prejudice communications made during the mediation … Continue reading Brown v Rice and Another: ChD 14 Mar 2007

Shaw and Another v Massey Foundation and Pilings Ltd: TCC 12 Mar 2009

The appellants had argued that they were not subject to the construction arbitration system because they were residential occupiers. They now said that as consumers vis a vis the construction contract. Judges: Coulson J Citations: [2009] EWHC 493 (TCC) Links: Bailii Statutes: The Housing Grants (Construction and Regeneration) Act 1996 106 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Shaw and Another v Massey Foundation and Pilings Ltd: TCC 12 Mar 2009

Emmott v Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd: ComC 12 Jan 2009

The claimant, a party to an arbitration, sought first an order requiring the defendant to comply with an order made by the arbitrator for the transfer of certain shares, and second an asset freezing order. Held: The conditions for a peremptory order were met, and the order should be enforced. There was also a risk … Continue reading Emmott v Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd: ComC 12 Jan 2009

Soleh Boneh International Ltd v Government of the Republic of Uganda: CA 1993

When asked to order provision of security on an application not to enforce an arbitration award, the right approach is that of a sliding scale. The court referred to assessing the strength of the argument that the award is invalid ‘on a brief consideration by the Court which is asked to enforce the award while … Continue reading Soleh Boneh International Ltd v Government of the Republic of Uganda: CA 1993

Gater Assets Ltd v Nak Naftogaz Ukrainiy: CA 17 Oct 2007

The defendant resisted enforcement of a Moscow arbitration award saying it had been obtained by fraud, and sought security for costs.The Court addressed the issue of security for the future costs of a challenge under section 103(3), which raises very different considerations to an issue of security for the past award itself. Rix LJ noted … Continue reading Gater Assets Ltd v Nak Naftogaz Ukrainiy: CA 17 Oct 2007

IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation: ComC 27 Apr 2005

A Nigerian arbitration award between two Nigerian companies was first subject to proceedings in Nigeria to set aside the award and subsequently to enforcement proceedings in England. Held: Gross J refused to consider immediate enforcement. He adjourned the proceedings for the payment of what was common ground to be indisputably due and of a further … Continue reading IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation: ComC 27 Apr 2005

Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd and Another v Mott Macdonald Ltd: TCC 17 Jul 2008

The court was asked whether the implication of terms into a written contract implied that it was not a contract in writing under ection 107. HHJ Seymour QC said: ‘it may be necessary to consider carefully the effect of s. 107 of the 1996 Act as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in RJT . … Continue reading Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd and Another v Mott Macdonald Ltd: TCC 17 Jul 2008

ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: ComC 19 Oct 2005

The court upheld an objection to one member of the arbitration panel for apparent bias, but refused to set aside a preliminary decision of the panel. Judges: Morison J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm), [2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 122 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also … Continue reading ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: ComC 19 Oct 2005

Cantillon Ltd v Urvasco Ltd: TCC 27 Feb 2008

After referring to the Carillion Construction case, the court held: ‘Whilst that case is, obviously, not authority for the proposition that a ‘good’ challenge to a decision on jurisdiction or natural justice grounds will be excluded on some statistical basis, a challenge on these grounds must be plain, clear and relatively comprehensible. In a case … Continue reading Cantillon Ltd v Urvasco Ltd: TCC 27 Feb 2008

Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007

An arbitrator hearing a case, and who appreciated that counsel had failed to take a point, should draw counsel’s attention to the point. No duty could arise if the arbitrator did not himself see the point. An applicant under section 68 faces a high hurdle in establishing serious irregularity, reflecting the reluctance of the courts … Continue reading Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007

London Underground Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd: TCC 20 Jul 2007

Each party challenged elements of an arbitration award. Judges: Ramsey J Citations: [2007] EWHC 1749 (TCC), [2007] 2 All ER (Comm) 694, [2006] 2 Lloyds 1, [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 529, [2007] ArbLR 39, [2007] BLR 391, (2007) 114 Con LR 1 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading London Underground Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd: TCC 20 Jul 2007

Melville Dundas Ltd and others v George Wimpey UK Ltd and others: HL 25 Apr 2007

The appellant sought an interim payment for works of construction undertaken for the respondents under a JCT contract. The respondents contended that, having terminated the contract on their receivership, the contract and Act meant that the interim payment was no longer payable. Held: (Neuberger and Mance dissenting) The appeal was allowed. Lord Hoffmann: Parliament had … Continue reading Melville Dundas Ltd and others v George Wimpey UK Ltd and others: HL 25 Apr 2007

The Mahkutai: PC 24 Apr 1996

(Hong Kong) The question was whether shipowners, who were not parties to the bill of lading contract between the charterers and carriers on the one part, and the cargo-owners, the bill of lading being a charterer’s bill, could enforce against the cargo-owners an exclusive jurisdiction clause contained in that contract. Held: Ship owners may not … Continue reading The Mahkutai: PC 24 Apr 1996

Eleni Shipping Ltd v Transgrain Shipping Bv: ComC 10 Apr 2019

Appeal under s. 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 by the Claimant Owners against an award by which the majority of the tribunal rejected the bulk of the Owners’ claims against the Defendant Charterers arising out of the capture by pirates in the Arabian Sea of their Panamax bulk carrier ‘ELENI P’ Judges: Justice Popplewell … Continue reading Eleni Shipping Ltd v Transgrain Shipping Bv: ComC 10 Apr 2019

Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Ltd: CA 9 Nov 2005

The parties had agreed for the provision of security for costs to cover thr proceedings save for any appeal. The defendant appealed an order refusing jurisdiction to vary that order. Held: The appeal succeeded. The court retained a jurisdictio to make an order for security for costs, and that jurisdiction was not lost for the … Continue reading Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Ltd: CA 9 Nov 2005

Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc: ChD 1 Nov 2005

The claimant owned the copyright in several successful computer games. He had granted licenses for the use of the software, which licences were assigned to the defendants. Disputes arose as to the calculation of royalty payments, and the claimant sought to exercise his auditing rights. The defendant company in the US handled the accountancy for … Continue reading Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc: ChD 1 Nov 2005

Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) Ltd: CA 7 Dec 2004

The claimant sought payment under its invoice for construction works. The contractor gave notice of its intention to withhold payment, and then also sought to refer the matter to arbitration. The claimant said that the notice had prevented the reference, and appealed a stay pending the arbitration. Held: The appeal failed. There was nothing in … Continue reading Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) Ltd: CA 7 Dec 2004

Miller and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union: SC 24 Jan 2017

Parliament’s Approval if statute rights affected In a referendum, the people had voted to leave the European Union. That would require a notice to the Union under Article 50 TEU. The Secretary of State appealed against an order requiring Parliamentary approval before issuing the notice, he saying that the notice could be given under the … Continue reading Miller and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union: SC 24 Jan 2017

Stretford v The Football Association Ltd and Another: CA 21 Mar 2007

The claimant was a football player’s agent. The licensing scheme required disputes, including disciplinary procedures, to be referred to arbitration. He denied that the rule had been incorporated in the contract. He also complained that the Association had agreed to postpone disciplinary proceedings pending the result of other litigation between the parties. Held: The appeal … Continue reading Stretford v The Football Association Ltd and Another: CA 21 Mar 2007

Inntrepreneur Pub Company (CPC) and others v Crehan: HL 19 Jul 2006

The tenant had taken on pub leases with ties requiring him to buy beer from companies associated with the landlords. The European Commission had issued a decision and the House was asked whether this was binding on the parties. Held: Intrepreneur’s appeal was allowed. The Commission’s decision was not binding. Lord Bingham: ‘Community law prohibits … Continue reading Inntrepreneur Pub Company (CPC) and others v Crehan: HL 19 Jul 2006

International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v The Mineral and Metals Trading Company of India; International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v The President of India; Himoff Maritime Enterprises Ltd v The President of India: ComC 16 Feb 1994

cw Arbitration – award – limitation period – cause of action arising – implied promise to perform award – breach – RSC Order 15 r.6 – misjoinder and non-joinder of party – principles – RSC Order 15 r.6 – joinder of party – proceedings a nullity – no power Judges: Waller J Citations: 16 February … Continue reading International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v The Mineral and Metals Trading Company of India; International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v The President of India; Himoff Maritime Enterprises Ltd v The President of India: ComC 16 Feb 1994

Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International AG and Another: QBD 27 Jul 2001

When asking whether the time for appeal against an arbitrator’s award should be extended, the court should look at several circumstances, including the length of the delay; whether the party was acting reasonably in all the circumstances in delaying; whether the other party had contributed to the delay; whether other party would suffer irremediable prejudice … Continue reading Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International AG and Another: QBD 27 Jul 2001

Attica Sea Carriers Corporation v Ferrostaal Poseidon Bulk Reederei GmbH, The Puerto Buitrago: CA 1976

The parties entered into a charterparty by demise of a bulk carrier. It was in a state of disrepair. The owners required the charterers to repair it before redelivery, and claimed hire losses until it was returned repaired. The extensive repairs required would have cost far more than the repaired value of the vessel. Mocatta … Continue reading Attica Sea Carriers Corporation v Ferrostaal Poseidon Bulk Reederei GmbH, The Puerto Buitrago: CA 1976

Owners of the cargo lately laden on board the ship or vessel “ELPIS” v Owners of the ship or vessel “ELPIS”: AdCt 17 Oct 1997

ComC Arbitration – letter of undertaking – Arbitration section (14) of the Arbitration Act 1996 – Appeal from Admiralty Registrar – Cargo claim – application to add Plaintiff – were Defendants entitled to a stay or was the Arbitration Agreement inoperative because of the terms of a letter of undertaking? – was the expression ‘owners … Continue reading Owners of the cargo lately laden on board the ship or vessel “ELPIS” v Owners of the ship or vessel “ELPIS”: AdCt 17 Oct 1997

Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlev von Appen GmbH v Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH (‘The Jay Bola’): CA 1997

The insurance company claimant had insured a cargo under a voyage charter made by the defendant as charterer with the claimant as time charterer and disponent owner of the vessel. The charter had an arbitration clause. The cargo was damaged in a fire and steps taken to extinguish it. The insurers began proceedings in Brazil … Continue reading Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlev von Appen GmbH v Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH (‘The Jay Bola’): CA 1997

Bouygues (Uk) Ltd v Dahl-Jensen (Uk) Ltd (In Liquidation): CA 17 Aug 2000

When the decision of an adjudicator was challenged, the court should ask whether the adjudicator had either asked the right question but in the wrong way, or whether he had even answered the wrong question. The procedure was intended to provide a quick and summary disposal, but that procedure might not be appropriate in cases … Continue reading Bouygues (Uk) Ltd v Dahl-Jensen (Uk) Ltd (In Liquidation): CA 17 Aug 2000

Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc: HL 31 Oct 1984

The House was asked whether the 1971 Act permitted the relevant authorities, by resort to their development plans, to support the retention of traditional industries or was the ambit of the Act such as to permit only ‘land use’ aims to be pursued? The court considered also the relevance of personal considerations in planning matters. … Continue reading Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc: HL 31 Oct 1984

Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger and Others: CA 22 Jul 1996

Citations: Times 22-Jul-1996, [1997] Eu LR 63, [1996] CLC 1757 Statutes: Consumer Arbitration Agreements Act 1988 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from (Affirmed) – Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger and Others ComC 8-May-1996 ComC Consumer contracts – arbitration provision – Consumer Arbitration Agreements Act 1988 – exceptions – sections 2(b), 4 … Continue reading Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger and Others: CA 22 Jul 1996

Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger and Others: ComC 8 May 1996

ComC Consumer contracts – arbitration provision – Consumer Arbitration Agreements Act 1988 – exceptions – sections 2(b), 4 : European Union – Consumer contracts – arbitration provision – Consumer Arbitration Agreements Act 1988 – exceptions – section 2(a) – distinction between domestic and non-domestic consumers – discrimination – Article 6 EC – freedom to provide … Continue reading Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger and Others: ComC 8 May 1996

Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd (The “Vimeira”): HL 1986

Wide Application of Costs Against Third Party A claim had been made against charterers by the ship owners, and in turn by the charterers against their sub-charterers. Notice of motion were issued after arbitration awards were not accepted. When heard, costs awards were made, which were now appealed. Held: The appeals were allowed. The court’s … Continue reading Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd (The “Vimeira”): HL 1986

West of England Shipowners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxembourg) v Cristal Ltd: CA 1996

A contract had been set up to provide compensation for oil pollution losses. It was between oil companies who contributed to the fund and its administrators, Cristalwho was to ‘be the sole judge in accordance with these terms of the validity of any claim made hereunder’. The claimant association made a claim which Cristal rejected. … Continue reading West of England Shipowners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxembourg) v Cristal Ltd: CA 1996

Murphy, and Murphy v Young and Co’s Brewery Plc, Sun Alliance and London Insurance Plc: CA 20 Nov 1996

When an unsuccessful party has had its legal costs funded under legal expenses insurance, should the insurer be held liable to pay the successful party’s costs? The insurer had not instigated the litigation, nor controlled it, and could not be accused of ‘wanton and officious intermeddling’. The insurance was general and did not relate to … Continue reading Murphy, and Murphy v Young and Co’s Brewery Plc, Sun Alliance and London Insurance Plc: CA 20 Nov 1996

Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ: SC 30 Oct 2019

Challenge to the making of a non-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the product liability insurer of one of the defendants in litigation being managed under a Group Litigation Order (‘GLO’). Many of the claimants in the successful action were not insured, and Travelers, the defendant’s insurers resisted … Continue reading Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ: SC 30 Oct 2019

Nordstrom-Janzon v The Netherlands: ECHR 1996

The parties had settled an earlier dispute under a joint venture agreement on terms which included a provision that disputes between them should not be settled by the ordinary courts but by a special arbitration procedure. The arbitrators rejected all the claims advanced by the applicants. The applicants challenged the award in the Dutch courts … Continue reading Nordstrom-Janzon v The Netherlands: ECHR 1996

India Steamship Co Ltd v Arab Potash Co Ltd: ComC 12 Dec 1997

Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69(3)(d): when is it just and proper in all the circumstances for the court to determine a question raised on an application for leave to appeal; issue of construction in a one-off charterparty clause where pre-existing judicial authority as to proper construction of similar wording Judges: Colman J Citations: Unreported, 12 … Continue reading India Steamship Co Ltd v Arab Potash Co Ltd: ComC 12 Dec 1997

Kye Gbangbola and Lisa Lewis v Smith Sherriff Limited: TCC 20 Mar 1998

‘A tribunal does not act fairly and impartially if it does not give a party an opportunity of dealing with arguments which have not been advanced by either party’. Judges: His Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd Qc Citations: [1998] 3 All ER 730 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – … Continue reading Kye Gbangbola and Lisa Lewis v Smith Sherriff Limited: TCC 20 Mar 1998

Revenue and Customs v Frank A Smart and Son Ltd: SC 29 Jul 2019

The question was whether a taxpayer can deduct as input tax the VAT which it has incurred in purchasing entitlements to an EU farm subsidy, the Single Farm Payment. The taxpayer had used those entitlements to annual subsidies over several years and intended to use money resulting from the receipt of those subsidies to fund … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Frank A Smart and Son Ltd: SC 29 Jul 2019

Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff’s EFtF’s A/S: QBD 1999

The court discussed the policies underlying the 1996 Act: ‘One of the major purposes of the Arbitration Act 1996 was to set out most of the important principles of the law of arbitration of England and Wales in a logical order and expressed in a language sufficiently clear and free from technicalities to be readily … Continue reading Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff’s EFtF’s A/S: QBD 1999