The council had taken the applicant’s children into care alleging that the mother had harmed them. In the light of the subsequent cases casting doubt on such findings, the mother sought the return of her children. She applied now that the hearings be in public. Held: The applicant and her solicitors had already made significant … Continue reading Kent County Council v The Mother, The Father, B (By Her Children’s Guardian); Re B (A Child) (Disclosure): FD 19 Mar 2004
(South African Constitutional Court) Prospective adoptive parents were a same-sex couple who challenged laws preventing them from adopting. The court said: ‘In their current form the impugned provisions exclude from their ambit potential joint adoptive parents who are unmarried, but who are partners in permanent same-sex life partnerships and who would otherwise meet the criteria … Continue reading Du Toit and Vos v Minister for Welfare and Population Development: 10 Sep 2002
The applicants complained that as an unmarried couple they had been excluded from consideration as adopters. Held: Northern Ireland legislation had not moved in the same way as it had for other jurisdictions within the UK. The greater commitment to traditional family structures did not however justify the difference. The rules were unlawful discrimination.Lord Hoffmann … Continue reading In re P and Others, (Adoption: Unmarried couple) (Northern Ireland); In re G: HL 18 Jun 2008
After a judgment the parties sought to appeal. Held: The judge had failed to make a finding on a critical issue in the case, namely whether or not the mother of the child concerned had ‘even if prompted only at a subconscious level, nevertheless deliberately engaged in alienation.’ Whilst some circumstances might require an application … Continue reading In re T (a Child) (Contact: Alienation: Permission to Appeal): CA 24 Oct 2002
The mother sought an order to revoke a placement order. Held: Her appeal succeeded. The judge had erred turning a pragmatic approach into a reckless one, in that he had failed to distinguish between a prospective adopter as required by the Act, and a potential adopter as in this case. Judges: Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord … Continue reading In re S (a Child: Adoption): CA 7 Oct 2008
The Claimants sought judicial review of i) the decision of the Defendant to give them a notice under section 35(2) of the 2002 Act, the effect of which was to require them to return K to the Defendant, and ii) the decision of the Defendant not to return K to their day to day care … Continue reading DL and Another v London Borough of Newham: Admn 27 May 2011
The plaintiffs each complained of negligent decisions in his or her education made by the defendant local authorities. In three of them the Court of Appeal had struck out the plaintiff’s claim and in only one had it been allowed to proceed. Held: The House unanimously dismissed the local authority’s appeal in that last case … Continue reading Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council; Anderton v Clwyd County Council; Gower v Bromley London Borough Council; Jarvis v Hampshire County Council: HL 28 Jul 2000
Parents of children had falsely and negligently been accused of abusing their children. The children sought damages for negligence against the doctors or social workers who had made the statements supporting the actions taken. The House was asked if the suffering of psychiatric injury by the parent was a foreseeable result of making it and … Continue reading JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust and others: HL 21 Apr 2005
Liability in Damages on Statute Breach to be Clear Damages were to be awarded against a Local Authority for breach of statutory duty in a care case only if the statute was clear that damages were capable of being awarded. in the ordinary case a breach of statutory duty does not, by itself, give rise … Continue reading X (Minors) v Bedfordshire County Council; M (A Minor) and Another v Newham London Borough Council; Etc: HL 29 Jun 1995
The court was asked whether it was lawful for the Secretary of State to make subordinate legislation imposing a cap on the amount of welfare benefits which can be received by claimants in non-working households, equivalent to the net median earnings of working households. The challenge was under the 1998 Act on the basis that … Continue reading SG and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 18 Mar 2015
Criminality of Assisting Suicide not Infringing The court was asked: ‘whether the present state of the law of England and Wales relating to assisting suicide infringes the European Convention on Human Rights, and whether the code published by the Director of Public Prosecutions relating to prosecutions of those who are alleged to have assisted a … Continue reading Nicklinson and Another, Regina (on The Application of): SC 25 Jun 2014
Standing to Claim under A1P1 ECHR The appellants had written employers’ liability insurance policies. They appealed against rejection of their challenge to the 2009 Act which provided that asymptomatic pleural plaques, pleural thickening and asbestosis should constitute actionable harm for the purposes of an action of damages for personal injury. Held: The insurers’ appeals failed. … Continue reading AXA General Insurance Ltd and Others v Lord Advocate and Others: SC 12 Oct 2011
Widowers claimed that, in denying them benefits which would have been payable to widows, the Secretary of State had acted incompatibly with their rights under article 14 read with article 1 of Protocol 1 and article 8 of the ECHR. Held: The Secretary’s appeal succeeded. Section 6 of the 1998 Act permitted the discrimination as … Continue reading Hooper and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: HL 5 May 2005
Several lone parents challenged the benefits cap, saying that it was discriminatory. Held: (Hale, Kerr LL dissenting) The parents’ appeals failed. The legislation had a clear impact on lone parents and their children. The intention was to encourage claimants back into work. It was said that thus contradicted the other policy of providing no free … Continue reading DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 15 May 2019
Freedom of Expression is Fundamental to Society The appellant had published a ‘Little Red Schoolbook’. He was convicted under the 1959 and 1964 Acts on the basis that the book was obscene, it tending to deprave and corrupt its target audience, children. The book claimed that it was intended to teach school children about sex, … Continue reading Handyside v The United Kingdom: ECHR 7 Dec 1976
The claimants challenged the 1967 Act, saying that it deprived them of their property rights when lessees were given the power to purchase the freehold reversion. Held: Article 1 (P1-1) in substance guarantees the right of property. Allowing a mechanism for the compulsory transfer of the freehold interest in the house and the land to … Continue reading James and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Feb 1986
(Grand Chamber) The Swiss Court had rejected the claimant mother’s claim, under article 13b of the Hague Convention, that there was a grave risk that returning the child to Israel would lead to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation. Held: To enforce the order would be an unjustifiable interference … Continue reading Neulinger And Shuruk v Switzerland: ECHR 6 Jul 2010
Judges: Mr Justice Moor Citations:  EWHC 331 (Fam) Links: Bailii Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Adoption, Human Rights Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.521223
Application by two women M and T to adopt a girl C who is 11 years old. The case raises three issues requiring determination by the court: first, whether M is to be regarded as the mother of C by reason of an adoption order made in Nicaragua; secondly whether M and T are to … Continue reading T and Another v OCC and Another: FD 13 May 2010
The deceased had been shot by soldiers of the British Army whilst in a car in Northern Ireland. The car was alleged to have ‘run’ a checkpoint. The claimants said the investigation, now 20 years ago, had been inadequate. The claim was brought under human rights law, but predated by many years the incorporation of … Continue reading In re McKerr (Northern Ireland): HL 11 Mar 2004
The claimants had acted as foster carers for several years, but challenged a potential decision to discontinue that when, as committed Christians, they refused to sign to agree to treat without differentiation any child brought to them who might be homosexual. A declaration was sought as to the legality of the proposed decision. Held: A … Continue reading Johns and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Derby City Council and Another: Admn 28 Feb 2011
In the context of an application for a care order the LA now presented a final care plan of permanence away from their birth family by way of adoption and, accordingly, sought placement orders in addition to care orders. Wood HHJ  EWFC B155 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002, Children Act 1989 England and … Continue reading Re B (Children): FC 15 Sep 2014
The claimant, a famous footballer, complained that an article by the defendant relating an affair he had had, had infringed his right to privacy. The defendant relied on its right to freedom of expression. The claimant had at an earlier stage, and at the time of the incidents related, led a wilder social life, but … Continue reading Ferdinand v MGN Limited: QBD 29 Sep 2011
For a declaration that the Local Authority (LA) is not required by the Court to notify the Romanian Central Authority of these proceedings or to seek their assistance in identifying the birth father and wider family. Mrs Justice Lieven  EWHC 91 (Fam) Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 46 England and Wales Adoption Updated: … Continue reading The Prospective Adopters v The Mother and Another: FD 20 Jan 2021
The court was asked: ‘(1) Do rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (ECHR) survive the making of an adoption order? (2) Did the coming into force in April 2014 of s. 51A Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002), which allows the court to make a … Continue reading Seddon v Oldham MBC (Adoption : Human Rights): FD 14 Sep 2015
The local authority had obtained the issue of an Emergency Protection Order under the 1989 Act to remove a child at birth. Held: Where the possibility of harm arose from the mother introducing something into the child’s system (such as a laxative) that did not justify separating mother and child.  2 FLR 631, (2002) … Continue reading P, C and S v United Kingdom: ECHR 2002
The Local Authority sought a care order and approval of a final care plan for A to be adopted by his foster carers, therefore also a placement order. Levy HHJ  EWFC B143 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002, Children Act 1989 England and Wales Children, Adoption Updated: 24 December 2021; Ref: scu.540374
Application for care and placement order. Greene HHJ  EWFC B92 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 Children Updated: 18 December 2021; Ref: scu.535577
Lynch HHJ  EWFC B86 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 Children Updated: 18 December 2021; Ref: scu.535583
A mother sought to challenge guidelines issued by the respondent which would allow doctors to protect the confidentiality of women under 16 who came to them for assistance even though the sexual activities they might engage in would be unlawful. Held: A person under 16 who was otherwise competent was entitled to seek medical assistance, … Continue reading Axon, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Health and Another: Admn 23 Jan 2006
Application by FAS to adopt her first cousin once removed, MW. The application sought a convention adoption order, which is misconceived as Pakistan, MW’s homeland, is not a party to the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Inter-country Adoption. It has therefore been treated as … Continue reading FAS v Bradford Metropolitan District Council and Another: FD 13 Mar 2015
Resisted application for placement order. Keehan J  EWHC 97 (Fam) Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 Children Updated: 29 November 2021; Ref: scu.521219
The mother sought leave to oppose the making of an adoption order in respect of her daughter. Moses, Black, Gloster LJJ  EWCA Civ 1481 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 England and Wales Adoption Updated: 26 November 2021; Ref: scu.518322
Sir James Munby discussed the lamentable failure by a local authority to comply with an order of the court: ‘That the parents and their representatives should have been put in this position is quite deplorable. It is, unhappily, symptomatic of a deeply rooted culture in the family courts which, however long established, will no longer … Continue reading Re W (A Child) (A Child) (Adoption Order: Leave to Oppose): CA 16 Oct 2013
‘Since 1 December 2013 and by section 4(1) CA 1989 as inserted by section 111 Adoption and Children Act 2002, an unmarried father acquires parental responsibility by the inclusion of his name on the child’s birth certificate. That legislative change accompanied society’s recognition of and expectations for the exercise of parental responsibility by parents who … Continue reading Re M (A Child) sub nom PM v MB and M (a child): CA 31 Jul 2013
Foetus has no Established Human Rights The Claimants sought a declaration that section 1(1)(d) of the Abortion Act 1967, as amended, is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’), as well as some other remedies. The claimant had Down’s Syndrome, and complained the readiness to abort foetuses with identified Down’s genes – more … Continue reading Crowter and Others, Regina (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health And Social Care: Admn 23 Sep 2021
The claimants wished to claim that they were victims of a miscarriage of justice in the way the Council had dealt with care proceedings. They sought that the proceedings should be reported without the children being identified. Held: A judge must adopt the same ‘parallel analysis’ leading to the same ‘ultimate balancing test’, as described … Continue reading Norfolk County Council v Webster and others: FD 1 Nov 2006
Right to Life Did Not include Right to Death The applicant was paralysed and suffered a degenerative condition. She wanted her husband to be allowed to assist her suicide by accompanying her to Switzerland. English law would not excuse such behaviour. She argued that the right to die is not the antithesis of the right … Continue reading Pretty v The United Kingdom: ECHR 29 Apr 2002
The appellants were teachers in Christian schools who said that the blanket ban on corporal punishment interfered with their religious freedom. They saw moderate physical discipline as an essential part of educating children in a Christian manner. Held: The appeal was dismissed. For Article 9 to be engaged (aside from certain other threshold conditions) the … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others ex parte Williamson and others: HL 24 Feb 2005
The LA, the guardian and adoptive parents appealed against an order that they should provide to the parents an annual photograph of the child. They contended that an image should only be made available to be viewed at the authority’s offices annually. Held: The order was discharged. The judge had erred in law in reaching … Continue reading Oxfordshire County Council v X and Others: CA 27 May 2010
Adopted grandchildren entitled to succession The court was asked whether the adopted children whose adopting father, the son of the testator, were grandchildren of the testator for the purposes of his will. Held: The claim succeeded. The defendants, the other beneficiaries were not entitled to inherit the part of their father’s estate that derived from … Continue reading Hand and Another v George: ChD 17 Mar 2017
The judge had granted the mother leave to apply for revocation of placement orders. The authority appealed. The mother argued that once a change of circumstances was shown, the court was obliged to give leave to apply. Held: The judge was not so obliged, but instead had a discretion whether to grant leave to apply. … Continue reading Warwickshire County Council v M and others: CA 1 Nov 2007
The father sought to revoke a freeing order. He said that the social workers had conspired to exclude him from the process. The child was born of a casual relationship, and at first he was unaware of the proceedings. On learning of them he sought to revoke the placement order. Aware that they were doing … Continue reading In re F (A Child) (Placement Order); C v East Sussex County Council (Adoption): CA 1 May 2008
Four brothers and sisters had been adopted after the parents had been found to have abused them. The parents now had expert evidence that the injuries may have been the result of scurvy, and sought leave to appeal. Held: Leave was refused. Cases involving the reversal of adoptions in the past had been brought far … Continue reading Webster (the Parents) v Norfolk County Council and others: CA 11 Feb 2009
The mother had been refused leave to oppose her child’s adoption. She now appealed. Held: A court facing such an application faced two questions: Has there been a change in circumstances? If not, that is the end of the matter. If yes, then the question is, should leave to oppose be given? As to that, … Continue reading Re B-S (Children): CA 17 Sep 2013
A child was found to have bruising consistent with physical abuse. Either or both parents might have caused it, but the judge felt it likely that only one had, that he was unable to decide which, and that they were not so serious that he had to say that the other must have known. Held: … Continue reading In re S-B (Children) (Care proceedings: Standard of proof): SC 14 Dec 2009
The appeals were from conflicting decisions in care applications where one or other or both parents were guilty of lack of care, but there was no evidence to say which was responsible. Held: The threshold criteria had been met, and the court must next consider the welfare stage. Inability to identify the perpetrator is not … Continue reading In re O and N (Minors); In re B (Minors) (Care: Preliminary hearing): HL 3 Apr 2003
The court considered the approval required for an order under the 2002 Act. Held: Welfare considerations were important but not paramount: ‘Given the permanent nature of the order under s.30, it seems reasonable that the court should adopt the ‘lifelong’ perspective of welfare in the Adoption and Children Act 2002 rather than the ‘minority’ perspective … Continue reading In re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy): FD 9 Dec 2008
One claimant said that as a foreign resident pensioner, she had been excluded from the annual uprating of state retirement pension, and that this was an infringement of her human rights. Another complained at the lower levels of job-seeker’s allowance payable to those under 25. Held: (Lord Carswell dissented in part.) The claims failed. The … Continue reading Carson, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Reynolds v Same: HL 26 May 2005
The children had been placed with short term fosterers. On adopters being found, the fosterers themselves applied to adopt the children. The court was asked whether a county court judge had power to injunct the authority not to remove the children and whether the placement for adoption had taken place without the children being physically … Continue reading Coventry City Council v PGO and Others: CA 22 Jun 2011
The House considered when adoption law would allow an adoption without the consent of the birth parent where there had been some continuing contact between that parent and the child. Held: (Baroness Hale dissenting) The appeal against the adoption was dismissed. The judge’s opinion had been expressed strongly but he had expressed the law accurately, … Continue reading Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust and Another v H and Another: HL 12 Jul 2006
The Commission challenged the compatibility of the NI law relating to banning nearly all abortions with Human Rights Law. It now challenged a decision that it did not have standing to bring the case.
Held: (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson . .
Adoption of a child by a member of his or her family who live abroad. . .
Application for judicial review of decision to revoke approval of the applicants as an adoptive couple. . .
The President issued 22 new practice directions relating to practice and procedure in diferent courts dealing with adoptions. They are to be published on 23 December 2005. . .
The foster mother of a baby promptly indicated a wish to adopt her. Following four months of assessment Coventry informed her that, for reasons which she wished to challenge, her adoption of the baby would be unsuitable. Three days prior to so . .
A single homosexual man complained that the respondent state had made it impossible for him to adopt a child.
Held: The claim was within the ambit of article 8 as regards respect for family life, but the court dismissed the claim under article . .
The claimant sought damages. The respondent had acted as an adoption agency but had failed to disclose all relevant information about the child.
Held: Any such duty extended only during the period where the child was with the prospective . .
The father sought leave to appeal a care order and an order releasing his child for adoption.
Held: The court applied Re W as to the extent of the duty of the appellate court in such matters. The appeal would stand no reasonable prospect of . .
The court granted an appeal in care proceedings, but examined the relationship between the court and local authorities. There had been a late change in the proposed care plan and an application by grandparents to be made party. Some in the . .
Appeal against refusal to revoke placement orders. . .
Foster carers of children wanted to adopt them without the parents knowing their identity, using the confidential serial number approach. The parents had been led to believe that the children had been placed with a different family for adoption and . .
The applicants sought damages after they had had placed with them for adoption a child who proved to be destructively hyperactive.
Held: The authority might be liable where they failed to disclose to adoptive parents known characteristics of a . .
The child was taken to hospital with injuries which the doctors concluded were non-accidental. The identity of the abuser was in doubt.
Held: The court set out to identify the procedures in cases involving suspected non-accidental injuries . .
The applicants, grandparents, sought leave to appeal against a care order and placement for adoption. The child’s parents would be unable to provide care. The grandmother siffered tinnitus and reduced vision.
Held: No error of law had been . .
The applicant sought an order restraining publication by the defendants of material, saying she did not have capacity to consent to the publication. She suffered a multiple personality disorder. She did herself however clearly wish the film to be . .
The claimant sought to restrain publication by the defendant of a book recounting very personal events in her life. She claimed privacy and a right of confidence. The defendant argued that there was a public interest in the disclosures.
Held: . .
Parents and the authority agreed that a proposed adoption by an uncle. The uncle lived in America, and could not come to the UK for the ten weeks required under the 2002 Act.
Held: The requirement of the Act that the child should have spent . .
The parents appealed against an adoption order saying that the authority had made an error in the procedure. The court at first instance had said that the error had been remedied by the effect of the hearing before him.
Held: The appeal . .
It will occasionally be proper for the court to grant a parent leave to apply to revoke a placement order under section 24(2)(a) of the 2002 Act 2002 notwithstanding the absence at present of any real prospect that a court would find it to be in the . .
When the court had an application by a parent for leave to defend adoption proceedings after the making of the placement order, the court had to make a two stage decision. First, the court had to identify whether there had been a sufficient change . .
The porposed adopters appealed an order requiring notice to be given to the natural parents before the final adoption order could be made.
Held: The freeing order had been made under the 1976 Act. Accordingly under the transitional provisions . .
The appellant had sought adoption of a young person aged 18 of Pakistani nationality. The court rejected her application, saying it was an attempt to subvert immigration controls. . .
An IVF treatment centre used sperm from one couple to fertilise eggs from another. This was discovered, and the unwilling donors sought a paternity declaration.
Held: Section 28 did not confer paternity. The mistake vitiated whatever consents . .
The applicants challenged the way in which their newborn children had been removed by the state after birth. S had not had the opportunity of legal representation, after her lawyers had withdrawn. The removal of S’s child was challenged as . .
The court refused to find that the failure of United Kingdom law to recognise a female to male trans-sexual as the father of a donor insemination child, born to his partner and brought up as their child, was a breach of their rights to respect for . .
References:  EWFC B155 Links: Bailii Coram: Wood HHJ In the context of an application for a care order the LA now presented a final care plan of permanence away from their birth family by way of adoption and, accordingly, sought placement orders in addition to care orders. Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002, Children … Continue reading Re B (Children); FC 15 Sep 2014
References:  EWFC B143 Links: Bailii Coram: Levy HHJ The Local Authority sought a care order and approval of a final care plan for A to be adopted by his foster carers, therefore also a placement order. Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002, Children Act 1989
References:  EWHC 259 (QB), Gazette 01-May-2003,  1 FLR 1091 Links: Bailii Coram: The President An IVF treatment centre used sperm from one couple to fertilise eggs from another. This was discovered, and the unwilling donors sought a paternity declaration. Held: Section 28 did not confer paternity. The mistake vitiated whatever consents had been … Continue reading AHE Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A, A, YA and, ZA (By Their Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority B, B: QBD 26 Feb 2003
References:  EWFC B92 Links: Bailii Coram: Greene HHJ Application for care and placement order. Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002
References:  EWFC B86 Links: Bailii Coram: Lynch HHJ Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The court asked ‘what is the proper test for dispensing with parental agreement to the making of a placement order under section 52(1)(b) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (the 2002 Act)?’
Held: Any question of contact between the children . .
The grandparents of E who had obtained a special guardianship order to take care of their grand-daughter, whose parents were addicted to drugs, appealed an order refusing them permission to change her surname to theirs. Held: The decision was not inconsistent with the grant of the order giving them parental responsibility. The court retained its … Continue reading In Re E (A Child): Special Guardianship Order: CA 13 Mar 2007
Citations:  EWHC 2783 (Fam),  WLR(D) 615 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002 35 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Adoption Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.656333
Father’s appeal from the dismissal of his application under section 47(5) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 for leave to oppose the making of an adoption order in respect of his child. Citations:  EWCA Civ 2638 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Adoption Updated: 25 April 2022; Ref: scu.620144
Judges: Lord Justice Moylan Lord Justice Baker And Lady Justice Whipple Citations:  EWCA Civ 299 Links: Bailii Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002 24(2)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Adoption Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.674504
B had been removed into care at birth. The parents now appealed against a care order made with a view to B’s adoption. The Court was asked as to the situation where the risks were necessarily only anticipated, and as to appeals against a finding of fact. Held: (Lady Hale dissenting) The appeal was dismissed. … Continue reading Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria): SC 12 Jun 2013
Judges: Holman J Citations:  EWHC 385 (Fam) Links: Bailii Statutes: Adoption and Children Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Adoption Updated: 03 February 2022; Ref: scu.521964
The court was asked as to: ‘a) The approach to be taken in determining a child’s long-term welfare once the child has become fully settled in a prospective adoptive home and, late in the day, a viable family placement is identified; b) The application of the Supreme Court judgment in Re B  UKSC 33 … Continue reading In re W (A Child): CA 29 Jul 2016
Application made by the local authority to revoke a placement order that was made in Leeds County Court over five years after the placement order was made. Her Honour Judge Hillier  EWFC B175 Bailii Adoption and Children Act 2002 England and Wales Adoption Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.541413
Care proceedings and an application for a placement order in respect of a baby boy. Hillier HHJ  EWFC B162 Bailii Children Act 1989, Adoption and Children Act 2002 England and Wales Children Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.540380
Gareth Jones HHJ  EWFC B168 Bailii Children Act 1989, Adoption and Children Act 2002 England and Wales Children Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.540383
The Court was asked two questions, first as to its jurisdiction according to the meaning of an ‘EEA Decision’ within the 2006 Regulations, and second as to the position under the Directive of a child who is a third country national but has been placed in the legal guardianship of European Union citizens under the … Continue reading SM (Algeria) v Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section: SC 14 Feb 2018
P was the child of now separated women. P was born in the UK but taken by one parent to Pakistan. The other parent now appealed from refusal of her request for the court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction or wardship to support her application for contact for contact with P. The court considered whether, … Continue reading Re CB (A Child): CA 6 Aug 2015
The court considered the proper approach to a proposed step-parent adoption. The step-father now appealed against refusal of an order. Held: The application succeeded. When the adoption application was considered, the court had to be satisfied that each parent or guardian of the child either consented to the making of the adoption order, or that … Continue reading In re P (A Child): CA 15 Aug 2014