Re Lyne-Stephens and Scott-Miller’s Contract: CA 1920

A vendor of a house was entitled to retain the benefits of payments from a tenant made between contract and completion, because the vendor had sold the house but not yet also the benefit of the lease.

[1920] 1 Ch 472
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedEnglewood Properties Limited v Patel and Another ChD 16-Feb-2005
The claimant was a property developer, which sought to sell a row of shops at auction. One lot was a Woolworths store, where the company owned both freehold and leasehold interests, with Woolworths occupying an underlease, which the claimant had . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract, Land, Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 18 December 2021; Ref: scu.223743