Links: Home | swarblaw - law discussions

swarb.co.uk - law index


These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.  















Health Professions - From: 1995 To: 1995

This page lists 10 cases, and was prepared on 27 May 2018.

 
Regina v Northern and Yorkshire RHA, ex parte Trivedi [1995] 1 WLR 961
1995

Auld LJ
Health Professions, Administrative
The court discussed the scope of the disciplinary process undertaken by the respondent: "The fact that the process is investigative and inquisitorial rather than a form of litigation between the parties …. does not mean that the medical service committee or the authority is entitled to investigate and make findings on matters not the subject of complaint."
1 Citers


 
Regina v General Medical Council Ex Parte Virik Times, 17 February 1995; Ind Summary, 01 May 1995
17 Feb 1995
QBD

Discrimination, Health Professions
the General Medical Council may not impose a higher standard on foreign doctors for qualification. Such a requirement is discriminatory.
1 Citers


 
Strathclyde Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Another v Argyll and Clyde Health Board and Another Times, 06 March 1995
6 Mar 1995
OHCS

Health Professions
A decision that a pharmacist's move is minor can be made without reference to others.


 
 Regina v Cambridge Health Authority ex parte B; CA 10-Mar-1995 - [1995] EWCA Civ 49; [1995] Fam Law 480; [1995] 6 Med LR 250; [1995] 1 FLR 1056; [1995] 2 FCR 485; [1995] 2 All ER 129; [1995] COD 407; [1995] 1 WLR 898
 
Kramer v South Bedforshire Health Care Trust Times, 16 October 1995; [1995] ICR 1066
16 Oct 1995
ChD
Lightman J
Employment, Health Professions
It was for the Trust employer to decide which kind of disciplinary proceedings to institute. Absent bad faith or Wednesbury unreasonableness, the employer's decision on categorisation was final. There can be no reason otherwise to include in the contract this provision that categorisation is a matter for the trust.
1 Citers



 
 Regina v General Medical Council Ex Parte Virik; CA 31-Oct-1995 - Times, 31 October 1995

 
 Regina v Yorkshire Regional Health Authority Ex Parte Suri, Regina v Same Ex Parte Gompels Etc; CA 5-Dec-1995 - Times, 05 December 1995; Ind Summary, 18 December 1995
 
McCandless v General Medical Council Ind Summary, 15 January 1996; Gazette, 07 February 1996; Times, 12 December 1995
12 Dec 1995
PC

Health Professions
Seriously negligent treatment may be serious professional misconduct by doctor.

 
Dr Subhash Chandra Malliwal v The General Medical Council Co (The Health Committee of The General Medical Council) [1995] UKPC 56
18 Dec 1995
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]

 
 Plenderleith v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons; PC 19-Dec-1995 - Times, 19 December 1995; [1995] UKPC 50
 
Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.