Links: Home | swarblaw - law discussions

swarb.co.uk - law index


These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.  















Equity - From: 1960 To: 1969

This page lists 19 cases, and was prepared on 16 April 2015.

 
Lowe -v- Lombank Ltd [1960] 1 WLR 196
1960
CA

Equity, Estoppel
The court set out three criteria for an evidential estoppel.
1 Citers



 
 A Roberts & Co Ltd-v- Leicestershire County Council; ChD 1961 - [1961] Ch 555; [1961] 2 All ER 545

 
 Campbell Discount Company Ltd -v- Bridge; CA 1961 - [1961] 1 QB 445

 
 in Re Pilkington's Will Trusts; Pilkington -v- Inland Revenue Commissioners; CA 2-Jan-1961 - [1961] Ch 488
 
Williams -v- Hensman [1861] 1 John & Hem 546; [1861] 30 LJ CH 878; [1861] 5 LT 203; [1861] 7 Jur NS 771; [1861] 70 ER 862; [1861] EWHC Ch J51
10 Jun 1961

Sir William Page Wood VC
Equity, Wills and Probate
A fund of money was bequeathed on trust to be invested so as to generate an income payable to A 'the principal to go to her children at her death'. Held: The will created a joint tenancy. The court set out three ways in which a joint tenancy may be severed. Where joint tenants indicated by their conduct that they treated their interests separately, the fact that they did not understand that their interests had been joint did not prevent such behaviour acting to sever the tenancy.
1 Citers

[ Bailii ]

 
 Jones -v- Lipman and Another; ChD 1962 - [1962] 1 WLR 832; [1962] 1 All ER 442

 
 In Re Pilkington's Will Trusts; Pilkington -v- Inland Revenue Commissioners; HL 1962 - [1964] AC 612; [1962] 3 All ER 622; [1962] 3 WLR 1051; 106 Sol Jo 834; 40 Tax Cas 433
 
Lovelock -v- Margo [1963] 2 QB 786
1963


Landlord and Tenant, Equity

County Courts Act 1959 191(3)
1 Citers



 
 Re Hewitt's Contract; 1963 - [1963] 1 WLR 1298

 
 Re Pauling's Settlement Trusts (No.1); CA 29-May-1963 - [1963] EWCA Civ 5; [1964] Ch 303; [1963] 3 All ER 1; [1963] 3 WLR 742
 
Inwards -v- Baker [1965] QB 29; [1965] 1 All ER 446; [1965] 2 WLR 212; [1965] EWCA Civ 465
13 Jan 1965
CA
Lord Denning MR, Danckwerts and Salmon LJJ
Equity, Estoppel
An indulgent father had encouraged his son to build a bungalow on his, the father's, land. The son had done so in the expectation, encouraged by the father, that he would be permitted to remain in occupation. Held: The court formulated the principle of equitable estoppel on the footing that where a person has expended money on the land of another with the expectation, induced or encouraged by the owner of the land, that he would be allowed to remain in occupation, an equity is created such that the court would protect his occupation of the land; and that the court has power to determine in what way the equity so arising would be satisfied. The court therefore refused the plaintiff an order for possession of the bungalow which his son had built on the land, and held that the son was entitled to stay there as long as he wanted. It need not be not fatal to a claim under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel that the property in which the right is claimed has not been precisely identified.
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ]

 
 Senanayake -v- Cheng; PC 1966 - [1966] AC 63

 
 Phipps -v- Boardman; HL 1966 - [1966] 3 All ER 721; [1967] 2 AC 46; [1966] UKHL 2

 
 Vandervell -v- Inland Revenue Commissioners; HL 24-Nov-1966 - [1966] UKHL 3; [1967] 2 AC 291
 
R W Pathirana -v- A Pathirana [1967] 1 AC 233
1967
PC

Company, Equity
Section 29 requires a partner to account to the partnership for any private benefit which he derives at the expense of the partnership, and this duty subsists after the dissolution of the partnership until the winding up is completed. An inalienable asset had been acquired by one partner in his own name but in account of the firm.
Partnership Act 18980 29
1 Citers



 
 Seager -v- Copydex Ltd; CA 1967 - [1967] 1 WLR 923; [1967] RPC 349
 
Wakeham -v- Mackenzie [1968] 1 WLR 1175
1968


Equity, Landlord and Tenant
The plaintiff sought performance of an oral agreement to grant a tenancy having given up her own home to move into her employer's home. Held: There had been sufficient part performance.


 
 Thatcher -v- CH Pearce & Sons (Contractors) Ltd; 1968 - [1968] 1 WLR 748

 
 Carl Zeiss Stiftung -v- Herbert Smith No.2; CA 1969 - [1969] 2 WLR 427
 
Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.