Click the case name for better results:

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group Plc: CA 9 Oct 2001

The respondent sought to deduct input tax from income it received from lettings. It had previously occupied the buildings itself making exempt supplies, but then let them. They later waved their exemption, and sought to deduct input tax for periods prior to the election. One issue was whether a lease was one supply or a … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group Plc: CA 9 Oct 2001

Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 12 Oct 2000

Tenants of long lease where the landlord had elected to charge VAT, decided to seek sub-tenants. They delayed election themselves in order to assist such sub-tenants, but eventually waved their exemption and sought to reclaim the VAT paid to their own landlords. The commissioners objected. The deduction system was fundamental, and intended to relieve businesses … Continue reading Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 12 Oct 2000

Garsington Opera Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Apr 2009

FTTTx Value Added Tax – Input tax – Attribution of input tax – Opera Company making both exempt and taxable supplies – Company makes exempt supplies of tickets and taxable supplies of sponsorship rights, programmes, CDs etc. to public and makes taxable supplies of productions to outside concert hall – Company pays input tax when … Continue reading Garsington Opera Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Apr 2009

London Institute (Now Known As the University of the Arts, London) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 6 Dec 2005

Value Added Tax – Claim for input tax under-declared – Claim made on 30 January 2001 for input tax under-claimed 1989-1996 – Legislation introducing limitation period for making claims had no provision for transitional relief – Effect on claim – Whether reasonable period sufficient for making claim – Value Added Tax Regulations 1995, SI 1995/2518, … Continue reading London Institute (Now Known As the University of the Arts, London) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 6 Dec 2005

University of Sussex v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 10 Oct 2001

The taxpayer had made a considered decision not to deduct certain input VAT claims against its payments made over a long period of time up to 1996. They later concluded that they should have made the deductions, and claimed them. The Commissioners asserted that the claims were now statute barred. Held: If the claim had … Continue reading University of Sussex v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 10 Oct 2001

Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 22 May 2003

The landlord had elected to waive exemption to charging VAT on its lettings. The tenant relet the demised premises, but at first without charging VAT. It later charged VAT on the sublease, but the commissioners objected to the attempt of the claimants under regulation 109 to reclaim the VAT it had itself paid before that … Continue reading Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 22 May 2003

Green (T/A Cmos) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 26 Sep 2005

VAT – deduction of input tax – sufficiency of evidence of Appellant’s making taxable supplies – sufficiency of evidence of payment of input tax and circumstances relative thereto – VATTA 1994 Sections 24-26, VATA Regulations (SI 1995/2518) – Appeal refused. Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19265 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 02 June 2022; … Continue reading Green (T/A Cmos) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 26 Sep 2005

Oriental Delicacy Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Jun 2005

Value Added Tax – pre-registration expenditure on fitting-out restaurant premises – invoices in respect of ‘services’ pre-dating registration by more than 6 months – whether recoverable as ‘input tax’ following on registration – Regulation 111(2) (d) of VAT Regulations (SI 1995/2518) and Article 17 of the Sixth Directive – Appeal refused. Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19129 … Continue reading Oriental Delicacy Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Jun 2005

Fleming (T/A Bodycraft) v Revenue and Customs: HL 23 Jan 2008

The transitional rules introducing time limits for failing to deduct VAT inputs made insufficient allowance for the decisions in Marks and Spencer and Grundig. Held: Lord Hope said: ‘To be compatible with EU law, taxpayers were entitled to be told in advance of any transitional arrangements that would enable them to submit late accrued claims … Continue reading Fleming (T/A Bodycraft) v Revenue and Customs: HL 23 Jan 2008

Forth Wines Ltd (Formerly Dollar Trade Ltd) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 23 Jan 2012

Simplified Import VAT Accounting Scheme (SIVA); Excise Payment Security System Scheme (EPSS); Refusal to waive need to provide security to defer import VAT and excise duty; statutory discretion; whether refusal unreasonable having regard to HMRC published criteria; Value Added Tax Act 1994 s16(1)(4)and(8); Customs Excise and Management Act 1979 ss45 and127A, The Customs Duties (Deferred … Continue reading Forth Wines Ltd (Formerly Dollar Trade Ltd) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 23 Jan 2012

Imran v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Nov 2014

VAT – Registration threshold – whether exceeded – Yes – liability to assessment and penalty – Sections 67 and 70, and Schedule 1, VATA 1994 and VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518) – penalty mitigated; quoad ultra appeal dismissed [2014] UKFTT 1041 (TC) Bailii England and Wales VAT Updated: 24 December 2021; Ref: scu.539422

Nathaniel and Co Solicitors v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Oct 2010

Value Added Tax — repayment claim – s. 80 (1) Value Added Tax Act 1994 — three year time limit – s. 80 (4) Value Added Tax Act 1994 — whether valid claim for repayment of output tax was made pursuant to Regulation 37 Value Added Tax Regulations 1995/2518 — held no [2010] UKFTT 472 … Continue reading Nathaniel and Co Solicitors v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Oct 2010

National Galleries of Scotland v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Nov 2005

Recovery of tax – claim involving output and input tax – claim purported to be made and partially met under s80 VATA – whether new or adjusted claim – date of claim – whether ‘capped’ under Reg 29(1A) – whether legislation imposing cap unlawful – what transitional period would be appropriate if 29(1A) can be … Continue reading National Galleries of Scotland v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Nov 2005