Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Donnachie, Regina (on the Application of) v Cardiff Magistrates’ Court: Admn 27 Jul 2007

The defendant appealed refusal of the district judge to state a case on the basis of having no jurisdiction. Held: Where the magistrate is acting not as an Examining Magistrate, but is deciding a preliminary issue as to jurisdiction, his ruling upon that is final and can properly be challenged by way of case stated … Continue reading Donnachie, Regina (on the Application of) v Cardiff Magistrates’ Court: Admn 27 Jul 2007

Adaway, Regina v: CACD 3 Nov 2004

Appeal from conviction on two counts of supplying goods with a false trade description contrary to section 1(1)(b) of the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 Citations: [2004] EWCA Crim 2831 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.406618

Cavendish Woodhouse Ltd v Wright: 8 Mar 1985

If a salesman in a shop makes representations to say that he could supply goods identical to a sort described, the description becomes attached to the goods delivered for the purposes of the Act, and if it is false, it is a false description. The first information alleged that the Appellants applied a false description … Continue reading Cavendish Woodhouse Ltd v Wright: 8 Mar 1985

Decidebloom Ltd (T/A Stoneacre Motor Group) v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council: Admn 10 Dec 2008

The defendant brought a case stated in its defence of allegations under the 1968 Act arising from the sale of a Fiat Punto. It was said to have advertised ‘Drive away a new Fiat Punto for a certain price. The car offered was pre-registered. The only effect was the loss of two month’s warranty. Held: … Continue reading Decidebloom Ltd (T/A Stoneacre Motor Group) v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council: Admn 10 Dec 2008

Regina v Docklands Estates Ltd: CACD 22 Sep 2000

The offence committed by an estate agent of erecting ‘House Sold’ signs outside house in which it had had no instructions, was the offence of giving a false indication that services were supplied. The offence was commercial, and the penalty should be judged accordingly. The offence was unsightly, was for commercial gain, and to the … Continue reading Regina v Docklands Estates Ltd: CACD 22 Sep 2000

Dorset County Council v House: CACD 13 Oct 2010

The defendant appealed against his convictions after selling cattle without eartags and failing to give proper notifications of cattle movements. Judges: Toulson LJ, Maddison, Hickinbottom JJ Citations: [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 Links: Bailii Statutes: Cattle Identification Regulations 1998 (1998 SI No 871), Cattle Database Regulations 1998 (1998 SI No 1796) 5(1), Trade Descriptions Act 1968 … Continue reading Dorset County Council v House: CACD 13 Oct 2010

Donnachie, Regina (on the Application of) v Cardiff Magistrates’ Court and Another: Admn 16 Mar 2009

A prosecutor for the purposes of the Trade Descriptions Act was the council and not an individual employee. Judges: Leveson LJ, Sweeney J Citations: [2009] EWHC 489 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Trade Descriptions Act 1968 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Distinguished – Riley and Others v Crown Prosecution Service Admn 18-Oct-2016 The defendants appealed … Continue reading Donnachie, Regina (on the Application of) v Cardiff Magistrates’ Court and Another: Admn 16 Mar 2009

Sunworld Limited v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council: QBD 2000

The company faced a prosecution under the 1968 Act, in respect of a brochure. On conviction, the company asked the Crown Court to state a case for the Divisional Court. The Recorder refused as to two points, saying that they were decisions of fact not law. The company sought judicial review for mandamus to require … Continue reading Sunworld Limited v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council: QBD 2000

London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v David Jones: CA 30 Jul 1999

The authority appealed refusal of an injunction restraining the defendant from further breaches of the consumer protection statutes. Judges: Brooke LJ, May LJ, Laws LJ Citations: [1999] EWCA Civ 2049 Links: Bailii Statutes: Trade Descriptions Act 1968 1, Unsolicited Goods and Services Act 1971 2, Business Names Act 1985 4 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Consumer, … Continue reading London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v David Jones: CA 30 Jul 1999

Shropshire County Council (David Walker) v Simon Dudley Limited: Admn 17 Dec 1996

A customer’s description of the goods he required was a trade description for the future supply of those goods by the seller claiming to fulfil that specification. The trading standards officer appealed dismissal of his prosecution of the defendant on four informations alleging an unlawful supply of goods. The defendant had tendered successfully to a … Continue reading Shropshire County Council (David Walker) v Simon Dudley Limited: Admn 17 Dec 1996

Louis C Edwards (Manchester) Limited v Charles Miller: CA 1981

A local County Council asked for tenders for meat. It specified the maximum depth of subcutaneous fat of pork. A school cook ordered pork without making any reference to the depth of the fat. A quantity of pork was thereafter delivered. The pork did not meet the specifications. The Appellant meat suppliers were convicted of … Continue reading Louis C Edwards (Manchester) Limited v Charles Miller: CA 1981

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass: HL 31 Mar 1971

Identification of Company’s Directing Mind In a prosecution under the 1968 Act, the court discussed how to identify the directing mind and will of a company, and whether employees remained liable when proper instructions had been given to those in charge of a local store. Held: ‘In the expression ‘act or default’ in section 23 … Continue reading Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass: HL 31 Mar 1971

Beckett v Cohen: QBD 1972

Citations: [1972] 1 WLR 1593 Statutes: Trade Descriptions Act 1968 14(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Shropshire County Council (David Walker) v Simon Dudley Limited Admn 17-Dec-1996 A customer’s description of the goods he required was a trade description for the future supply of those goods by the seller claiming to fulfil … Continue reading Beckett v Cohen: QBD 1972

Lewin v Truebell Plc: Admn 24 Mar 1997

The prosecutor appealed against dismissal of his claim that the defendants had sold kits advertised to contain 100 pieces, when they said the pack contained only 61 pieces usable seperately. The defendants ponted to 100 pieces, of which 39 were not tools as such. The parties disputed the case as stated, but had not resolved … Continue reading Lewin v Truebell Plc: Admn 24 Mar 1997

Formula One Autocentres Ltd v Birmingham City Council: QBD 29 Dec 1998

A return of a serviced car to its owner by a garage is a supply of goods (not merely services) within the section, and a garage owner can be prosecuted under the Act accordingly. The return of the vehicle transferred and so supplied the vehicle. Citations: Times 29-Dec-1998 Statutes: Trade Descriptions Act 1968 1(1)(a) Consumer … Continue reading Formula One Autocentres Ltd v Birmingham City Council: QBD 29 Dec 1998

Regina v Page: CACD 20 Dec 1995

A false statement made to a trading standards officer who was investigating an offence under the Act is itself an offence. Citations: Gazette 06-Mar-1996, Ind Summary 29-Jan-1996, Times 20-Dec-1995 Statutes: Trades Descriptions Act 1968 29(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 08 October 2022; Ref: scu.87512

Regina v Bull: CACD 4 Dec 1995

An odometer figure which was stated on the sales slip to be wrong was not s false trade description. Citations: Times 04-Dec-1995, [1997] RTR 123 Statutes: Trades Descriptions Act 1968 1-1-a Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Donnachie, Regina (on the Application of) v Cardiff Magistrates’ Court Admn 27-Jul-2007 The defendant appealed refusal … Continue reading Regina v Bull: CACD 4 Dec 1995

Prince Albert v Strange: ChD 8 Feb 1849

The Prince sought to restrain publication of otherwise unpublished private etchings and lists of works by Queen Victoria. The etchings appeared to have been removed surreptitiously from or by one Brown. A personal confidence was claimed. Held: The jurisdiction in confidence is based not so much on property or on contract as on a duty … Continue reading Prince Albert v Strange: ChD 8 Feb 1849