Click the case name for better results:

A B and C (UK Surrogacy Expences): FC 10 Jun 2016

Russelll J [2016] EWFC 33 Bailii Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 England and Wales Family, Health Updated: 18 January 2022; Ref: scu.566231

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX: SC 1 Apr 2020

A negligent delay in the diagnosis of her cancer left the clamant dependent on paid for surrogacy arrangements. Three issues were raised; could damages to fund surrogacy arrangements using the claimant’s own eggs be recovered? Second, if so, could damages to fund arrangements using donor eggs be recovered? Third, in either event, could damages to … Continue reading Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX: SC 1 Apr 2020

CW v NT and Another: FD 21 Jan 2011

The mother had entered into a surrogacy arrangement to be inseminated, and give birth to the child, but then declined to transfer the child. The intended parents now sought a residence order. Payments had been made toward expenses, but no written agreement had been entered into. Held: None of the three principals had been frank … Continue reading CW v NT and Another: FD 21 Jan 2011

Re W (A Minor) (Adoption: Non-Patrial): CA 1986

W was born in China to Chinese parents. His aunt came to Britain and acquired citizenship. He came to live with her while studying, and she applied to adopt him. The judge refused saying that the primary intention was to obtain citizenship. Held: The appeal failed. It should be good practice to give notice to … Continue reading Re W (A Minor) (Adoption: Non-Patrial): CA 1986

Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust: HL 16 Oct 2003

The claimant was disabled, and sought sterilisation because she feared the additional difficulties she would face as a mother. The sterilisation failed. She sought damages. Held: The House having considered the issue in MacFarlane only recently it was inappropriate to change the rules set down in that case. Nothing had been put forward to argue … Continue reading Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust: HL 16 Oct 2003