The appellant challenged a decision by the tribunal made in its absence that the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear against it a claim for unfair dismissal. Held: The tribunal had erred. Though Sengupta had been decided under common law, it remained instructive. Though the tribunal had cited the section, it had not applied it correctly. … Continue reading United Arab Emirates v Abdelghafar and Another: EAT 10 Jul 1995
India did not appear at court to take a point on jurisdiction under the 1978 Act. The Court asked for the appointment of an amicus to assist it. Held: The court has a duty under statute to give the effect to the immunity conferred, even though the state does not appear to claim it. As … Continue reading Sengupta v Republic of India: 1983
Grand Chamber – The applicant alleged that there had been a violation of her right of access to a court, as guaranteed by Article 6-1 of the Convention.The applicant was a secretary and switchboard operator employed in the Polish embassy in Vilnius, Lithuania. The Supreme Court of Lithuania’s decision was based on the Strasbourg court’s … Continue reading Cudak v Lithuania: ECHR 23 Mar 2010
