Click the case name for better results:

Baron v Crown Prosection Service: 13 Jun 2000

Morison J said: ‘Equally, citizens have an unfettered access to the Courts to resolve disputes and to conduct those proceedings forcefully, causing legitimate aggravation to the other party within the procedural rules. Persons will or may feel harassed as a result of the lawful conduct of forcefully conducted litigation. On the other hand, if proceedings … Continue reading Baron v Crown Prosection Service: 13 Jun 2000

Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors and Others (No 2): CA 5 Mar 2013

Judges: Sir Terence Etherton Ch, Rix, Lewison LJJ Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ 149 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors CA 15-Feb-2011 The claimant sought protection under the Act from his former employers’ behaviour in making repeated allegations against him. He … Continue reading Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors and Others (No 2): CA 5 Mar 2013

Savings and Investment Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v Fincken: CA 14 Nov 2003

Parties to litigation had made without prejudice disclosures. One party sought to give evidence contradicting the dsclosure, and the other now applied for leave to amend based upon the without prejudice statements to be admitted to demonstrate the perjury. Held: The court had to balance the competing needs of fairness and expedition. There was nothing … Continue reading Savings and Investment Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v Fincken: CA 14 Nov 2003

AM v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others: QBD 23 Feb 2012

The claimant had obtained an interim order restraining many media organisations from publishing any story which might concern his life. Representatives of the Sun having been said to have acted in breach of the order, the proceedings were amended to name its owner as the first defendant. Judges: Tugendhat J Citations: [2012] EWHC 308 (QB) … Continue reading AM v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others: QBD 23 Feb 2012

COS v PER and Another: QBD 3 Mar 2021

Reasons for grant of injunction to restrain the Defendants from publishing private information and other information detrimental to the Claimant and ordering them to remove a particular video from the internet. Judges: Morris J Citations: [2021] EWHC 475 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 191) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Litigation Practice, Human … Continue reading COS v PER and Another: QBD 3 Mar 2021

Bell, Regina v: CACD 30 Apr 2010

Application for leave to appeal against sentence – granted. Judges: David Clarke J, Lloyd-Jones J Citations: [2010] EWCA Crim 1075 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 2 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 25 August 2022; Ref: scu.424859

Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and Others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (‘SHAC’) and Others: QBD 30 Oct 2009

Judges: Sweeney J Citations: [2009] EWHC 2716 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection against Harassment Act 1997 83 Citing: Cited – Handyside v The United Kingdom ECHR 7-Dec-1976 Freedom of Expression is Fundamental to SocietyThe appellant had published a ‘Little Red Schoolbook’. He was convicted under the 1959 and 1964 Acts on the basis that the … Continue reading Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and Others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (‘SHAC’) and Others: QBD 30 Oct 2009

Assistant Deputy Coroner for Inner West London v Channel 4 Television Corporation: QBD 31 Oct 2007

The coroner investigating the death of Prncess Diana sought an order for the production by Channel 4 of documents and materials in its possession. Held: Whilst the order should be made, it must be recognised that the Civil Procedure Rules were designed for use within an adversarial context, and not within the context of the … Continue reading Assistant Deputy Coroner for Inner West London v Channel 4 Television Corporation: QBD 31 Oct 2007

KD v Chief Constable of Hampshire: QBD 23 Nov 2005

The claimant’s daughter had made a complaint of rape. She alleged that she was sexually harassed by the investigating police officer, and sought damages also from the defendant, his employer. The officer denied that anything improper or non-consensual had taken place. Held: The taking of the statements was a course of conduct and was plainly … Continue reading KD v Chief Constable of Hampshire: QBD 23 Nov 2005

Wainwright and another v Home Office: HL 16 Oct 2003

The claimant and her son sought to visit her other son in Leeds Prison. He was suspected of involvement in drugs, and therefore she was subjected to strip searches. There was no statutory support for the search. The son’s penis had been touched which was a battery. Held: The policy considerations which limit the heads … Continue reading Wainwright and another v Home Office: HL 16 Oct 2003

Roberts v Bank of Scotland Plc: CA 11 Jun 2013

The bank appealed against a finding that it had harassed the claimant customer by its repeated telephone calls. Held: The appeal failed as to liability and quantum.Harassment can occur even if the conduct in question is, at first sight, commonplace or unremarkable. Judges: Arden, Jackson, McCombe LJJ Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ 882 Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading Roberts v Bank of Scotland Plc: CA 11 Jun 2013

Director of Public Prosecutions v Seivanayagam; Director of Public Prosecutions v Moseley; Director of Public Prosecutions v Woodling: QBD 23 Jun 1999

Where a defendant had acted in breach of a court injunction, that conduct, almost necessarily, could not be considered as potentially reasonable for the purposes of the defence available under Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Citations: Times 23-Jun-1999 Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 1(3)(c) Crime Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.80047

Zeran v America Online: 1997

(United States of America) Wilkinson CJ discussed the statutory protection given to Internet Service providers in the US: ‘Section 230 creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make service providers liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service. Specifically, Section 230 precludes courts from entertaining claims that would … Continue reading Zeran v America Online: 1997

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass: HL 31 Mar 1971

Identification of Company’s Directing Mind In a prosecution under the 1968 Act, the court discussed how to identify the directing mind and will of a company, and whether employees remained liable when proper instructions had been given to those in charge of a local store. Held: ‘In the expression ‘act or default’ in section 23 … Continue reading Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass: HL 31 Mar 1971

Sharma v Wells and Medico-Legal Investigations Ltd: QBD 2003

The court struck out a claim for damages against an employer for harassment under the 1997 Act. Judges: Gray J Citations: [2003] EWHC 1230 Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1977 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust CA 16-Mar-2005 The claimant had sought damages against his … Continue reading Sharma v Wells and Medico-Legal Investigations Ltd: QBD 2003

Daiichi UK Ltd and others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and Others; Asahi Glass UK ltd and others v Same; Eisaai Ltd v Same; Yam,anouchi Pharma UK Ltd and others v Same; Sankyo Pharma UK Ltd and others v Same: QBD 13 Oct 2003

The claimants sought injunctions and orders under the act against the respondent in respect of acts of harrassment intended variously to dissuade the companies form engaging in activities disapproved by the respondents. Held: The Act was not available to protect companies. Orders were granted for the individuals employed by them who had been affected, but … Continue reading Daiichi UK Ltd and others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and Others; Asahi Glass UK ltd and others v Same; Eisaai Ltd v Same; Yam,anouchi Pharma UK Ltd and others v Same; Sankyo Pharma UK Ltd and others v Same: QBD 13 Oct 2003

Saha v Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine: QBD 7 Aug 2013

The claimant a former PhD student sought substantial damages alleging harassment by her supervisor, employed by the defendant. Held: The claim failed. The claimant had become fixated, and those working alongside both partes, whilst recognising the supervisor’s sometimes abrupt manner, did not support the allegations. Hamblen J [2013] EWHC 2438 (QB) Bailii Protection of Harassment … Continue reading Saha v Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine: QBD 7 Aug 2013

Strathclyde Regional Council v Zafar; Zafar v Glasgow City Council: HL 16 Oct 1997

The absence of any other explanation for the unfair dismissal of a black worker, does not of itself and inescapably lead to finding of race bias, or racial discrimination. He had been dismissed following complaints of sexual harassment, later found to be unsupported. The tribunal reasoned that the dismissal was to be presumed to be … Continue reading Strathclyde Regional Council v Zafar; Zafar v Glasgow City Council: HL 16 Oct 1997

Langley v Preston Crown Court and others: CACD 30 Oct 2008

The defendant sought to appeal against a ‘stand-alone’ anti-social behaviour order. The parties disputed whether an appeal lay. The act created an appeal against the making of an order but in this case it was a renewed order. Held: In the county court there is a right of appeal against an ASBO and its variation … Continue reading Langley v Preston Crown Court and others: CACD 30 Oct 2008

CM (Em Country Guidance; Disclosure) Zimbabwe CG: UTIAC 31 Jan 2013

UTIAC (1) There is no general duty of disclosure on the Secretary of State in asylum appeals generally or Country Guidance cases in particular. The extent of the Secretary of State’s obligation is set out in R v SSHD ex p Kerrouche No 1 [1997] Imm AR 610, as explained in R (ota Cindo) v … Continue reading CM (Em Country Guidance; Disclosure) Zimbabwe CG: UTIAC 31 Jan 2013

Hayes v Willoughby: CA 13 Dec 2011

Harassment Occurs on the Result, not the Intention The claimant said that over several years, the respondent had pursued him in many ways challenging his management of a company’s affairs. Complaints had been investigated by the insolvency service and by the police who had discovered nothing to support futher action. The respondent said that his … Continue reading Hayes v Willoughby: CA 13 Dec 2011

Hayes v Willoughby: SC 20 Mar 2013

The claimant and appellant had been employer and employee who had fallen out, with a settlement in 2005. The appellant then began an unpleasant and obsessive personal vendetta against Mr Hayes, complaining to public bodies with allegations of tax evasion, fraud and similar. Several investigations all concluded against the appellant, and indeed disproved in 2007. … Continue reading Hayes v Willoughby: SC 20 Mar 2013

Hunter and Others v Canary Wharf Ltd: HL 25 Apr 1997

The claimant, in a representative action complained that the works involved in the erection of the Canary Wharf tower constituted a nuisance in that the works created substantial clouds of dust and the building blocked her TV signals, so as to limit her enjoyment of her land. Held: The interference with TV reception by an … Continue reading Hunter and Others v Canary Wharf Ltd: HL 25 Apr 1997

Dowson and Others v Northumbria Police: QBD 30 Apr 2009

Nine police officers claimed damages for alleged harassment under the 1997 Act by a senior officer in having bullied them and ordered them to carry out unlawful procedures. Amendments were sought which were alleged to be out of time and to have arisen from different facts. Held: Amendments were allowed where they arose from the … Continue reading Dowson and Others v Northumbria Police: QBD 30 Apr 2009

Calland v Financial Conduct Authority: CA 13 Mar 2015

The claimant appealed against the striking out of his claim of harassment against the Authority who had contacted him in an intended review of pensions mis-selling. They had contacted him once by letter, once by telephone and once by e-mail. Held: The judge had failed properly to make an assessment of the case, but even … Continue reading Calland v Financial Conduct Authority: CA 13 Mar 2015

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Hall and others v Save Newchurch Guinea Pigs (Campaign) and others: QBD 17 Mar 2005

The claimants ran a guinea pig farm. They and their neighbours applied for injunctions and an exclusion zone to keep away the defendants who campaigned against the breeding of animals for research. Held: The claimants had been subjected to a long and sustained campaign of harassment by the defendant organisation and its associates. The court … Continue reading Hall and others v Save Newchurch Guinea Pigs (Campaign) and others: QBD 17 Mar 2005

Hall v Fox: QBD 19 Jul 2012

A security company had become insolvent. One shareholder, the claimant, re-established a business with a third party. His former co-shareholder then secured a consultancy agreement, assigning the benefit of that agreement to the defendant. The claimant now complained of harassment by the defendant. The defendant had an historic conviction for a serious offence, and was … Continue reading Hall v Fox: QBD 19 Jul 2012

Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and Others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and Others: QBD 27 Oct 2014

The claimant sought permanent worldwide injunctions against the defendants to restrain them from harrassing their staff. The companies were involved in medical research involving animal experiments. Held: On the written evidence put before the court the test for summary judgment in CPR 24.2 was satisfied. McGowan J [2014] EWHC 3429 (QB) Bailii Protection from Harassment … Continue reading Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and Others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and Others: QBD 27 Oct 2014

Huntingdon Life Sciences Group Plc and Another v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC): QBD 15 Mar 2007

The claimant company was licensed to carry out scientific research, including research on live animals. The defendant association and its members opposed such work as cruel. The claimant had obtained an injunction to restrain the defendants harrassing protests. They now sought additional orders to protect staff members. Held: The order had provided a structure within … Continue reading Huntingdon Life Sciences Group Plc and Another v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC): QBD 15 Mar 2007

McClaren v News Group Newspapers Ltd: QBD 5 Sep 2012

The claimant had obtained an interim injunction to restrain the defendant publishing what he said was private information about a sexual encounter. He also sought an injunction under the 1997 Act. Held: The claim succeeded: ‘there have been threats by the defendant to disclose private information concerning the claimants and harassment of them. As to … Continue reading McClaren v News Group Newspapers Ltd: QBD 5 Sep 2012

Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust: HL 12 Jul 2006

Employer can be liable for Managers Harassment The claimant employee sought damages, saying that he had been bullied by his manager and that bullying amounting to harassment under the 1997 Act. The employer now appealed a finding that it was responsible for a tort committed by a manager, saying that the intention of the Act … Continue reading Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust: HL 12 Jul 2006

Jones and Another v Ruth and Another: CA 12 Jul 2011

The parties were neighbours. The claimants succeeded in their assertion of trespass and nuisance in building works carried out by the defendant. The claimant appealed against the judge’s failure to award damages for harassment, saying that though the judge had found harassment, he had made no award saying that the damage was not reasonably forseeable. … Continue reading Jones and Another v Ruth and Another: CA 12 Jul 2011

Slade v Slade: CA 17 Jul 2009

Contempt sentence to reflect existing punishment The wife appealed against a sentence of imprisonment imposed for a second contempt of court. She said that the behaviour complained of had already been dealt with in criminal proceedings. Held: The sentence was reduced. The second court should be fully informed of the factors and circumstances reflected in … Continue reading Slade v Slade: CA 17 Jul 2009

McNally v Saunders: QBD 16 Jul 2021

The claimant a senior local authority official alleged harassment by the defendant a semi-retired solicitor publishing an online blog claiming to reveal local government actions he disproved of. The defendant now sought to strike out the claim.

Mohamed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea: CA 28 Apr 1995

The claimant applied to the Council for accommodation, claiming to be homeless and in priority need. The council housed him in a hotel owned by Mr Manek in Tooting Bec . He had a room, a separate bathroom and lavatory, and shared use of a kitchen. After three days the council completed their investigations. Though … Continue reading Mohamed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea: CA 28 Apr 1995

Burris v Azadani: CA 27 Jul 1995

The court addressed the principles upon which a Court will grant interlocutory injunctive relief in harassment cases. Held: Both the High Court and the County Court had jurisdiction under the 1981 and 1984 Acts to grant interlocutory injunctions in wide terms to restrain conduct that was not in itself tortuous or otherwise unlawful, if such … Continue reading Burris v Azadani: CA 27 Jul 1995

ABC v Palmer: KBD 7 Dec 2022

Judges: Mr Justice Griffiths Citations: [2022] EWHC 3128 (KB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 1 3 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Media, Torts – Other, Information Updated: 12 December 2022; Ref: scu.683814

Pratt v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 21 Jun 2001

Whilst the law clearly allowed prosecutions under the Act after no more than two incidents of harassment, nevertheless, prosecutors should look to the reality of whether the acts complained of did in fact amount to a course of conduct under the Act. In this case, but marginally, they did. Prosecutors should look to the purpose … Continue reading Pratt v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 21 Jun 2001

AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd: QBD 25 Jul 2012

The claimant child sought damages and an injunction from and against the defendant newspapers, alleging harassment and breach of her privacy. At times there had been as many as ten reporters encamped outside her house. Judges: Nicola Davies J Citations: [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB), [2013] EMLR 2 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997, … Continue reading AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd: QBD 25 Jul 2012

Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Ltd: CA 27 Jun 2018

Whether valid grant of leave to appeal on retirement of judge. Citations: [2018] EWCA Civ 1470, [2018] WLR(D) 396, [2018] 1 WLR 4766 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd ChD 22-Mar-2021 The defendant had been … Continue reading Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Ltd: CA 27 Jun 2018

Waxman, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 2 Feb 2012

Claim for judicial review of the decision of the Crown Prosecution Service (‘CPS’) not to pursue the prosecution of Mr. Elliot Fogel for harassment of the applicant, Ms Claire Waxman. Judges: Moore-Bick J Citations: [2012] EWHC 133 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 07 … Continue reading Waxman, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 2 Feb 2012

EDO MBM v Axworthy: QBD 4 Nov 2005

The several defendants were said to have conducted against the claimants, protesting at their involvement in arms design and manufacture. The claimant sought orders under the 1997 Act to restrain them thus protecting its staff. Held: The orders were made. The test of purpose under the 1997 Act was subjective. Judges: Walker J Citations: [2005] … Continue reading EDO MBM v Axworthy: QBD 4 Nov 2005

Howlett v Holding: QBD 25 Jan 2006

The court had granted an injunction to restrain the defendant from flying aircraft trailing banners abusive of the claimant. He now said that this infringed his right to free speech, and that his actions were permitted by virtue of section 1(3). Held: Eady J drew from Hansard the proposition that the sub-section was framed with … Continue reading Howlett v Holding: QBD 25 Jan 2006

Buxton and Others, Regina v: CACD 1 Dec 2010

The defendant environmental protesters had been convicted of obstructing a railway. They now appealed against the terms of a restraining order made under the 1997 Act. They said that an order could not be made to protect a limited company. Held: The appeal was allowed. Although the case law did allow such an order in … Continue reading Buxton and Others, Regina v: CACD 1 Dec 2010

Regina v Chrysostomou: CACD 24 Jun 2010

The defendant appealed against his conviction for harassment. He was said to have used an imitation firearm to put a person in fear of violence. The prosecution had used texts received to the defendant’s mobile phone as ‘bad character’ evidence. The judge had ruled that they were not statements and therefore not hearsay and were … Continue reading Regina v Chrysostomou: CACD 24 Jun 2010

Awan, Regina v: CACD 6 Aug 2019

Proper approach to making restraining orders Judges: Holroyde LJ, Goss, Knowles JJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1456, [2020] 4 WLR 31, [2020] WLR(D) 77, [2020] 1 Cr App R (S) 25 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 16 August 2022; Ref: scu.642591

Lord Advocate (Representing The Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean: SC 28 Jun 2017

(Scotland) The respondent was to be extradited to Taiwan to serve the balance of a prison term. His appeal succeeded and the order quashed on the basis that his treatment in the Taiwanese prison system would infringe his human rights. The Lord Advocate now appealed. Held: The question was a devolution issue, being ‘a question … Continue reading Lord Advocate (Representing The Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean: SC 28 Jun 2017

MBR Acres Limited and Others v Free The MBR Beagles and Others: QBD 20 Jun 2022

Grant of injunction to restrain animal rights protesters. Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin Citations: [2022] EWHC 1715 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – MBR Acres Ltd and Others v Free The MBR Beagles and Others QBD 31-Mar-2022 . . Cited – Birmingham City … Continue reading MBR Acres Limited and Others v Free The MBR Beagles and Others: QBD 20 Jun 2022

Birmingham City Council v Afsar and Others: QBD 25 Jun 2019

Reason for grant of injunction to restrain demonstrations outside a school. Judges: Warby J Citations: [2019] EWHC 1619 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Birmingham City Council v Afsar and Others QBD 18-Jun-2019 The Council sought an interim order restraining a protest outside one … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Afsar and Others: QBD 25 Jun 2019

Director Of Public Prosecutions v Dziurzynski: Admn 28 Jun 2002

The defendant was an animal rights protester who had been convicted under section 2(2) of the 1997 Act of engaging in a course of conduct amounting to harassment of the employees of a company. The District Judge hearing the case made a restraining order against him. Held: The court rejected the appellant’s primary ground (the … Continue reading Director Of Public Prosecutions v Dziurzynski: Admn 28 Jun 2002

Smithkline Beecham Plc and Others v Avery and Others (Representing Stop Huntingdon Cruelty (‘SHAC’): QBD 26 Jun 2009

GlaxoSmithKline sought an injunction to restrain unlawful conduct by way of trespass and harassment by animal rights activists done with the aim of preventing the use of animals in medical research. Held: The court discussed whether an order was available under the 1997 Act to protect a company. It did.Jack J said: ‘By section 5 … Continue reading Smithkline Beecham Plc and Others v Avery and Others (Representing Stop Huntingdon Cruelty (‘SHAC’): QBD 26 Jun 2009

EDO Mbm Technology Ltd v Campaign To Smash EDO and Others: QBD 29 Apr 2005

The claimant sought an interim injunction to restrain the defendants in anticipation of a final hearing of their request for a permanent injunction under the 1997 Act. Judges: Gross J Citations: [2005] EWHC 837 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Cited by: See Also – EDO MBM v Axworthy QBD 4-Nov-2005 The … Continue reading EDO Mbm Technology Ltd v Campaign To Smash EDO and Others: QBD 29 Apr 2005

Allen v London Borough of Southwark: CA 12 Nov 2008

The claimant appealed against a strike out of his claim for harrassment after being subjected to five sets of possession proceedings by the defendant, each of which relied upon the same bad point. Held: The Court refused to strike out a claim for harassment by a tenant who (in the circumstances set out in the … Continue reading Allen v London Borough of Southwark: CA 12 Nov 2008

First Global Locums Ltd and others v Cosias: QBD 7 Jun 2005

‘On an application made without notice to the defendant on 16 September 2004, Mr Justice Simon granted an order restraining the defendant (a) pursuant to the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 from acting in relation to the claimants in a number of respects and (b) from acting in breach of certain post termination covenants in … Continue reading First Global Locums Ltd and others v Cosias: QBD 7 Jun 2005

Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd: CA 10 Feb 2009

Harassment to Criminal Level needed to Convict The claimant had been a customer of the defendant, but had moved to another supplier. She was then subjected to a constant stream of threatening letters which she could not stop despite re-assurances and complaints. The defendant now appealed against a refusal to strike out the claim of … Continue reading Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd: CA 10 Feb 2009

Allen v London Borough of Lambeth: CA 19 Jun 2008

Renewed application for permission to appeal. The claimant tenant insisted on paying his rent in cash. The council refused it and brought five sets of proceedings for possession. Each failed. Held: The appeal should proceed. Judges: Rimer LJ Citations: [2008] EWCA Civ 966 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Allen v London Borough of Lambeth: CA 19 Jun 2008

Cant v Seton: CA 29 Jul 2020

Appeal against an order dismissing his without notice application for an anti-harassment injunction against the Respondent. The Judge dismissed the Application on the single ground that she did not have jurisdiction to make the order sought. The Judge appeared to have failed to consider whether she had jurisdiction by reference to section 37(1) of the … Continue reading Cant v Seton: CA 29 Jul 2020

In re S (a Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication): HL 28 Oct 2004

Inherent High Court power may restrain Publicity The claimant child’s mother was to be tried for the murder of his brother by poisoning with salt. It was feared that the publicity which would normally attend a trial, would be damaging to S, and an application was made for reporting restrictions to be applied to avoid … Continue reading In re S (a Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication): HL 28 Oct 2004

Gsh, Regina v: CACD 4 Dec 2000

Appeal against conviction and sentence for harassment. Judges: Otton LJ, Hidden J, Sir Richard Tucker Citations: [2000] EWCA Crim 93 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 12 July 2022; Ref: scu.263620

Murray v Express Newspapers Plc and Another: ChD 7 Aug 2007

The claimant, now aged four and the son of a famous author, was photographed by use of a long lens, but in a public street. He now sought removal of the photograph from the defendant’s catalogue, and damages for breach of confidence. Held: The claim was struck out. In effect this was an application for … Continue reading Murray v Express Newspapers Plc and Another: ChD 7 Aug 2007

Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 22 Feb 2000

Appeal by case stated from conviction for harassment. The defendant said that for a series of actions to amount to a ‘course of conduct’ there had to be some nexus between those actions. Held: The conviction was quashed. Citations: [2000] EWHC QB 182, [2000] 1 FLR 799, [2000] Fam Law 610, [2000] Crim LR 580 … Continue reading Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 22 Feb 2000

Hilson, McCarthy v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 11 Apr 2019

The defendants appealed by case stated from convictions for harassment of a judge who had dealt with a family dispute in which they had been involved. The court considered whether their actions were capable of amounting to harassment. Held: They were. Citations: [2019] EWHC 1110 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 2(1) … Continue reading Hilson, McCarthy v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 11 Apr 2019

Hammond v International Network Services (UK) Ltd and Another: CA 15 Sep 2005

Leave application Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 1186 Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 1 7 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See also – Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd QBD 1-Nov-2007 Peter Coulson QC J said that in order to establish harassment under the 1997 Act, there must be conduct:i) which … Continue reading Hammond v International Network Services (UK) Ltd and Another: CA 15 Sep 2005

EDO Technology Ltd (‘EDO’) and Another v Campaign To Smash EDO and Others: QBD 4 Nov 2005

The claimants, arms manufacturers, sought order to prevent the various defendant campaigners from actions amounting to harassment of the company’s staff. Judges: Walker J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2490 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Protection From Harassment Act 1997 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Torts – Other Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.431741

Banks v Ablex Ltd: CA 24 Feb 2005

The claimant appealed denial of her claim for damages for psychological injury. She complained that her employer had failed to prevent her and other female employees being bullied by a co-worker, and they committed a breach of statutory duty in failing to prevent harassment under the 1997 Act. Held: There was insufficient evidence to say … Continue reading Banks v Ablex Ltd: CA 24 Feb 2005

Evans Dorothy, Regina v: CACD 6 Dec 2004

The defendant appealed her conviction for having breached a restraining order under the 1997 Act. The order required her not to be ‘abusive by words or actions’ towards her neighbour. She had regularly parked her car so as to block her neighbour’s visitors. She appealed saying there had been no case to answer. Held: ‘the … Continue reading Evans Dorothy, Regina v: CACD 6 Dec 2004

Barber v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 25 Oct 2004

The defendant appealed by case stated against his conviction for harassment. He was said to have played loud music late at night in contravention of a restraining order. He said that the prosecution had failed to prove the existence of the order. The magistrates argued that since that court had made the order, no certified … Continue reading Barber v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 25 Oct 2004