Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Da Silva Junior v Composite Mouldings and Design Ltd: EAT 18 Aug 2008

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Continuity of employment Company A dismissed the employee and went into creditors’ voluntary liquidation. Six weeks later, when the employee was absent due to a temporary cessation of work pursuant to the Employment Rights Act 1996 s212(3)(b), and so that time counted towards one year’s continuous employment under s108, Company B hired … Continue reading Da Silva Junior v Composite Mouldings and Design Ltd: EAT 18 Aug 2008

Curr v Marks and Spencer Plc: CA 13 Dec 2002

The claimant had been employed by the respondent, but after taking maternity leave had been made redundant. The employer claimed her continuous employment had been broken. Held: The section intended to protect continuous employment despite what might otherwise be breaks in employment. Nevertheless, the parties had to agree that employment would continue. That required both … Continue reading Curr v Marks and Spencer Plc: CA 13 Dec 2002

Carrington v Harwich Duck Co Ltd: EAT 31 Aug 1998

An employee resigned for his own financial purposes and was re-employed after the weekend. Later dismissed, his employment was said to be continuous. Held: It was difficult to contract out of statutory rights when it came to an issue of jurisdiction. Intermediate employment not enough. Citations: Times 31-Aug-1998 Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 212 Employment … Continue reading Carrington v Harwich Duck Co Ltd: EAT 31 Aug 1998

Booth et Al v United States of America: EAT 24 Mar 1999

Employees employed under fixed term contracts with two week periods in between were not continuously employed despite the expectation of the renewal of employment and the use of same employee number and same lockers. Citations: Gazette 24-Mar-1999, [1999] IRLR 16 Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 212(3)(c) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: 28 April 2022; … Continue reading Booth et Al v United States of America: EAT 24 Mar 1999

Services for Education (S4E Ltd) v White and Another: EAT 10 Aug 2015

EAT Transfer of Undertakings – JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Continuity of employment The transferee employer appealed against a Decision of the Employment Tribunal (‘the ET’) that the employee’s continuity of employment was preserved by section 212(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, despite a transfer of the undertaking in which the employee was employed, between a … Continue reading Services for Education (S4E Ltd) v White and Another: EAT 10 Aug 2015

Breakell v West Midlands Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association Named As Shropshire Army Cadet Force: EAT 11 Apr 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Worker, employee or neitherAppeal by an Army Cadet Force Adult Instructor from the judgment of an Employment Judge sitting alone that he was a volunteer and not in ’employment’ as defined by s68(1) Disability Discrimination Act 1995 as amended. Appeal dismissed. The Employment Judge was correct as his factual findings were … Continue reading Breakell v West Midlands Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association Named As Shropshire Army Cadet Force: EAT 11 Apr 2011

Tomlinson v Computer Software Group Ltd and others: EAT 12 Dec 2008

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTSClaim in time and effective date of termination2002 Act and pre-action requirementsSTATUTORY DISCIPLINE AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURESWhether infringedEDT – Step 1 Grievance – Continuing act (limitation). Citations: [2008] UKEAT 0352 – 08 – 1212 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 108(1) Citing: Cited – Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre EAT 5-Dec-2005 The claimant … Continue reading Tomlinson v Computer Software Group Ltd and others: EAT 12 Dec 2008

Holt v EB Security Services: EAT 2 Mar 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Continuity of employment The Employment Judge correctly analysed the circumstances leading to the termination of the Claimant’s first contract and the start of the second with an associated employer and found a gap of one week so destroying continuity under Employment Rights Act 1996 s 212(1). But there was no consideration … Continue reading Holt v EB Security Services: EAT 2 Mar 2011

Cornwall County Council v Prater: EAT 8 Jun 2005

EAT Contract of Employment – In this case we have held that where a Claimant teacher has accepted a succession of short term special teaching assignments, in circumstances where the Respondent employer was not obliged to offer further assignments and the teacher was not obliged to accept them, she was to be regarded nevertheless as … Continue reading Cornwall County Council v Prater: EAT 8 Jun 2005

Matheson v Mazars Solutions Ltd: EAT 16 Dec 2003

EAT Practice and Procedure – Application. The application had been presented timeously at the ET in Edinburgh, but was out of time when retransmitted to Glasgow. The tribunal had found the Edinburgh office to be an area office, and not a regional office and therefore the application was not accepted within the Regulations. The appellant … Continue reading Matheson v Mazars Solutions Ltd: EAT 16 Dec 2003

Gate Gourmet v J B Jangra: EAT 12 Dec 2000

EAT Unfair Dismissal – OtherThe employer appealed a finding of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. She suffered an apparently minor injury, but which led to long standing disability with varying diagnoses. The company doctor came to consider it would be a long time before she could return. She was dismissed for capability. Held: There was … Continue reading Gate Gourmet v J B Jangra: EAT 12 Dec 2000

Lawson v Serco Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2002

EAT Jurisdiction Judges: His Hon Judge J Altman Citations: EAT/18/02 Links: EAT Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 196 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Serco Ltd v Lawson and Foreign and Commonwealth Office CA 23-Jan-2004 The applicant had been employed to provide services to RAF in the Ascension Islands. He alleged constructive … Continue reading Lawson v Serco Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2002

Sheikh Khalid Bin Saqr Al Qasimi v Robinson: EAT 22 Dec 2017

VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Interim relief VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Whistleblowing VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Dismissal JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Fraud and illegality Interim relief application – whistleblowing claim – complaint of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 – protected disclosures – public interest – illegality Judges: Eady QC HHJ Citations: [2017] UKEAT 0283 – … Continue reading Sheikh Khalid Bin Saqr Al Qasimi v Robinson: EAT 22 Dec 2017

Graham v Agilitas IT Solutions Ltd: EAT 12 Oct 2017

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE The appeal concerns a challenge to a Preliminary Hearing Judgment holding that a number of discussions during meetings held on a without prejudice basis between the Appellant and the CEO of the Respondent prior to the termination of his employment were protected pursuant to section 111A(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 and/or … Continue reading Graham v Agilitas IT Solutions Ltd: EAT 12 Oct 2017

London Borough of Haringey v O’Brien: EAT 22 Dec 2016

EAT Practice and Procedure: Estoppel or Abuse of Process – DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Reasonable adjustments DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Section 15 HARASSMENT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Exclusions/jurisdictions UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal Practice and procedure – estoppel; disability discrimination reasonable adjustments (sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010); discrimination arising from the consequences of disability (section … Continue reading London Borough of Haringey v O’Brien: EAT 22 Dec 2016

Eiger Securities Llp v Korshunova: EAT 2 Dec 2016

EAT (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected Disclosure) VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Detriment VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Dismissal The Employment Tribunal erred in failing to identify any legal obligation, as opposed to guidance, of which the Claimant believed the Respondent to be in breach. Accordingly the finding that the Claimant had made a qualifying disclosure within the meaning of … Continue reading Eiger Securities Llp v Korshunova: EAT 2 Dec 2016

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust v Balogun (Unfair Dismissal : Procedural Fairness/Automatically Unfair Dismissal): EAT 5 Dec 2014

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Procedural Fairness/Automatically Unfair Dismissal – Polkey deduction The Employment Judge found that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed and that there should be no Polkey deduction. She erred in three respects: (1) she wrongly found that the reason for the dismissal was not potentially fair, when on any view it was … Continue reading South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust v Balogun (Unfair Dismissal : Procedural Fairness/Automatically Unfair Dismissal): EAT 5 Dec 2014

Conroy v Scottish Football Association Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2013

EAT Jurisdictional Points : Worker, Employee or Neither – WORKING TIME REGULATIONS – Worker CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT – Whether established Employment status. The Claimant lodged a claim of unfair dismissal, age discrimination and a claim for holiday pay. The Respondent denied that he was an employee, arguing that he was a self-employed independent contractor. The … Continue reading Conroy v Scottish Football Association Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2013

Relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium (Belgian Linguistics) No 2: ECHR 9 Feb 1967

The applicants, parents of more than 800 Francophone children, living in certain (mostly Dutch-speaking) parts of Belgium, complained that their children were denied access to an education in French. Held: In establishing a system or regime to comply with a Convention obligation, a State may include within the system elements that are not strictly required … Continue reading Relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium (Belgian Linguistics) No 2: ECHR 9 Feb 1967

Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council: SC 14 Mar 2018

Burchell case remains good law The appellant head teacher had been dismissed for failing to disclose the fact that her partner had been convicted of a sex offence. She now appealed from rejection of her claim for unfair dismissal. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The tribunal was entitled to conclude that it was a reasonable … Continue reading Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council: SC 14 Mar 2018

law index

Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index