The claimant sought to enforce an arbitration award made in Sweden, even though it had yet to give its final adjudication on the defence under the New York Convention argued by the defendant. Held: The Act cannot have been intended to give the court an open discretion on the enforcement of international arbitration awards, but … Continue reading Yukos Oil Company v Dardana Ltd: CA 18 Apr 2002
An arbitration award should be refused where a party could show that he had not been allowed to present his case properly. The claimant had acted as a litigant in person. The judge hearing the appeal had refused to hear certain aspects of the case, but those aspects revealed cases coming under the heading of … Continue reading Irvani v Irvani: CA 10 Feb 2000
The claimant had achieved a judgment in arbitration proceedings abroad against the respondent foreign government regarding contracts providing services for the Holy Places in Saudi Arabia. The contract made no express provision for the nationality of applicable law. The respondent had not been party itself to the contract. The ICC award, given according to French … Continue reading Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan: SC 3 Nov 2010
Lord Phillips CJ expressed his own doubts about whether section 103(2) gives the court a broad discretion to allow enforcement of an award where one of the grounds set out in that subsection has been established. Citations: [2006] EWCA Civ 222, [2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 701 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 101(2) Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Kanoria and others v Guinness: CA 21 Feb 2006
The defendant resisted enforcement of a Moscow arbitration award saying it had been obtained by fraud, and sought security for costs.The Court addressed the issue of security for the future costs of a challenge under section 103(3), which raises very different considerations to an issue of security for the past award itself. Rix LJ noted … Continue reading Gater Assets Ltd v Nak Naftogaz Ukrainiy: CA 17 Oct 2007
A party accepting arbitration within one country took also that country’s system for supervising the process of arbitration, and enforcing any awards made. ComC 1. Application of section 103(2)(c) Arbitration Act 1996. Applicant’s submission that it had no opportunity to meet the claim against it in the course of the arbitration. Enforcement must have been … Continue reading Minmetals Germany Gmbh v Ferco Steel Ltd: ComC 1 Mar 1999
The claimant sought to enforce an international arbitration award against the defendant in respect of the provision of accommodation for Hajj pilgrims. A without notice order had been made to allow its enforcement, but that had been set aside. Held: When asked to review an arbitration award made internationally under the Convention, it was important … Continue reading Dallah Estates and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government Of Pakistan: CA 20 Jul 2009
