The plaintiff tenant appealed from the dismissal of its application under sections 22(1) and 23(2) of the Arbitration Act 1950 to set aside or remit to the arbitrator, on the grounds of misconduct, an award in a rent review arbitration, relating to a lease of premises at Abergele in North Wales Judges: Peter Gibson, Potter … Continue reading Living Waters Christian Centres Ltd v Fetherstonhaugh: CA 27 Apr 1999
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Peter Gibson J defined the phrase undue hardship as ‘hardship . . not warranted by the circumstances’. Judges: Peter Gibson J Citations: [1985] Ch 261 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1950 27 Cited by: Cited – Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Roach CA 20-Dec-2006 The court considered the reduction of state benefits payable to … Continue reading Tote Bookmakers Ltd v Development and Property Holding Co. Ltd.: 1985
ComC Arbitration – extension of period to appoint arbitrator – discretion – principles Judges: Langley J Citations: Lloyd’s List 2 March 1996 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1950 27 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.186002
The court considered its general approach to appeals against awards in arbitrations. Bingham J said: ‘as a matter of general approach the courts strive to uphold arbitration awards. They do not approach them with a meticulous legal eye endeavouring to pick holes, inconsistencies and faults in awards and with the objective of upsetting or frustrating … Continue reading Zermalt Holdings SA v NuLife Upholstery Repairs Ltd: 1985
The parties were Iranian Jews, father and son. The son arranged to export carpets from Iran in contravention of Iranian law. The father and son fell into dispute about their contracts and arranged for the issues to be resolved by the Beth Din according to Beth Din rules which incorporated Jewish Law. The son applied … Continue reading Soleimany v Soleimany: CA 4 Mar 1998
Arcadia chartered the Eurus, and had succeeded in their application for an award in arbitration proceedings against Total. The award had been reversed, and they now appealed against that order. The parties disputed whether the amount was an award of damages or technically a debt. Held: A clause allowing recovery of losses ‘due to failure … Continue reading Total Transport Corporation v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd (‘the Eurus’): CA 18 Nov 1997
The discretion in the court to to appoint an arbitrator under section 19(1) should not be narrowed without good reason. He continued: ‘In every such case there must come a time when the Court can properly refuse to grant [the relief sought] not because its dignity has been affronted nor in order to punish the … Continue reading The Frotanorte: CA 1996
The charter of the ship ‘New Flameno’ was repudiated two years early. The owners sold it, making rather more profit than they would have if sold after the end of the term. The court was now asked how the profit should affect the loss claim on the repudiation. The arbitrator had set off the profit … Continue reading Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama v Globalia Business Travel Sau: CA 21 Dec 2015
The court was asked how to assess damages arising out of the repudiation of a charterparty by charterers of a cruise ship, the ‘New Flameno’. The charter ending two years early, the owners chose to sell, and in the result got a much better price than would have been obtained had the charter continued for … Continue reading Globalia Business Travel Sau of Spain v Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama: SC 28 Jun 2017
The insurance company claimant had insured a cargo under a voyage charter made by the defendant as charterer with the claimant as time charterer and disponent owner of the vessel. The charter had an arbitration clause. The cargo was damaged in a fire and steps taken to extinguish it. The insurers began proceedings in Brazil … Continue reading Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlev von Appen GmbH v Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH (‘The Jay Bola’): CA 1997
PI Damages not Reduced for Own Pension The plaintiff policeman was disabled by the negligence of the defendant and received a disablement pension. Part had been contributed by himself and part by his employer. Held: The plaintiff’s appeal succeeded. Damages for personal injury were not to be reduced by deducting the full net value of … Continue reading Parry v Cleaver: HL 5 Feb 1969
Tenants of council flats with ineffective sound insulation argued that the landlord council was in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment in their tenancy agreements. Held: A landlord’s duty to allow quiet enjoyment does not extend to a positive duty to require an improvement in the sound-proofing of a building, well beyond standards which … Continue reading Southwark London Borough Council v Mills/Tanner; Baxter v Camden London Borough Council: HL 21 Oct 1999
The former owners of the ‘New Flameno’ appealed from an arbitration award. A charter of the vessel had been repudiated with two years left to run. The owners chose to sell. They made a substantial profit over the price they would have received after the full term of the charter. The arbitrator set off that … Continue reading Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama v Globalia Business Travel SAU (Formerly Travelplan SAU) of Spain: ComC 21 May 2014
There are no degrees of nullity The plaintiffs had owned mining property in Egypt. Their interests were damaged and or sequestrated and they sought compensation from the Respondent Commission. The plaintiffs brought an action for the declaration rejecting their claims was a nullity. The Commission replied that the courts were precluded from considering the question … Continue reading Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission: HL 17 Dec 1968
The parties disagreed as to the curial law of an arbitration agreement. The proper law of the building contract and the arbitration agreement was English but the reference was conducted in Scotland. Held: Evidence of behaviour after a contract had been made is inadmissible to assist in the construction of an entirely written contract. An … Continue reading Whitworth Street Estates (Manchester) Ltd v James Miller and Partners Ltd: HL 1970
LRA Costs : Parties Without Representation – Litigants in person – entitlement to costs and expenses; Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975, s 1(1), (2); Civil Procedure Rules: CPR 2.3(3), 48.6(1) – . .
